· Public charity
Team Up
We unite and support local organizations and individuals in addressing community-identified needs to help people thrive in southwest colorado.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 43% of TEAM UP’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 31 grants below total $378,034 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $540,889 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $162,855 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k17 grants · $125k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $254k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA COLORADO | $41,206 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB LA PLATA COUNTY | $34,400 |
| HOUSING SOLUTIONS FOR THE | $28,066 |
| DURANGO ADULT EDUCATION CENTER | $20,000 |
| THE POWERHOUSE | $18,002 |
| MANNA | $17,652 |
| LA PLATA YOUTH SERVICES | $16,397 |
| FORT LEWIS COLLEGE GRUB HUB | $13,000 |
| THE GRIEF CENTER OF SOUTHWEST CO | $12,500 |
| 4 THE CHILDREN | $12,000 |
| COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC | $10,285 |
| DURANGO MONTESSORI INC | $10,000 |
| SOUTHWEST COLORADO | $10,000 |
| RIVERHOUSE CHILDREN'S CENTER | $10,000 |
| ONWARD A COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $9,577 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $179k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
33 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DADURANGO ADULT EDUCATION CENTER9× · 2017–2025 · $136k · revenue +3%
- LPLa Plata Youth Services8× · 2017–2025 · $113k · revenue +184%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LA PLATA COUNTY INC6× · 2017–2025 · $94k · revenue +181%
Funded once
- SJSAN JUAN BASIN AREA AGENCY ON AGING INCORPORATEDone grant, 2017 · $19k · revenue +19%
- DPDOLORES PUBLIC LIBRARYone grant, 2024 · $14k
- TUTEAM UPgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $14k · revenue +27%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Center for Nonprofit Excellence strengthens Southern Colorado's nonprofit sector through leadership and resource development, advocacy and collaboration. Together, with our partners, we are co-creating a vibrant community in the Pikes…
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
Services provided in arapahoe county colorado related to early childhood education intervention issues.
The foundation is a state-based philanthropic foundation - led by latinos and for latinos. the foundation pursues civic, economic, and cultural opportunities that drive a more authentic narrative about latinos in the state and cement a…
AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…
Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.
To provide access to quality behavioral health services that enrich lives and promote wellness. We are driven by a profound respect for human dignity and a desire to serve the underrepresented, the disenfranchised, and those who experience…
Colorado organization for latina opportunity and reproductive rights (color) is a community-rooted nonprofit organization that works to enable latinx individuals and their families lead safe, healthy, self-determined lives.
At slv go! our mission is to connect people to the outdoors by expanding opportunities for trails, parks, and public lands through community-driven initiatives.
The Arc of West Central Colorado is organized exclusively for charitable, religious, educational and scientific purposes, including, for such purposes, the making of distributions to organizations that qualify as exempt organizations…
Rogue Climate's mission is to empower Southern Oregon communities most impacted by climate change including low-income, rural, youth, seniors & communities of color, to win climate justice by organizing for clean energy, sustainable jobs &…
To support healthy violence-free lives and relationships for all children and adults in the San Luis Valley by providing crisis intervention services advocacy and counseling for victims and survivors of domestic and sexual violence.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Early Childhood Council of La Plata County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Oak Tree Youth Resources. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DURANGO ADULT EDUCATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds La Plata Youth Services ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN COLORADO COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds Community Connections Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LA PLATA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds DURANGO 4-C COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds LA PLATA FAMILY CENTERS COALITION ↗
- Who funds Alternative Horizons Corporation ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHWEST COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds MANNA - THE DURANGO SOUP KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds HOUSING SOLUTIONS FOR THE SOUTHWEST ↗
- Who funds SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds ONWARD A LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMPANEROS FOUR CORNERS IMMIGRANT RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE POWERHOUSE ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST COLORADO MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Grief Center of Southwest Colorado ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST COLORADO ACCELERATOR PROG ↗
- Who funds Liberty School Inc ↗
- Who funds SAN JUAN BASIN AREA AGENCY ON AGING INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds DISABLED SPORTS USA - ADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Hive DGO ↗
- Who funds 4 the Children ↗
- Who funds SAN JUAN MOUNTAINS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds DURANGO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Durango Montessori Inc ↗
- Who funds Local First Foundation ↗
- Who funds TEAM UP ↗
- Who funds Southwest Center for Independence Inc ↗
- Who funds Womens Resource Center in Durango ↗
- Who funds CONSERVATION LEGACY ↗
- Who funds RIVERHOUSE CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Southwest Colorado Education Collaborati ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ballantine Family Fund · Colorado Gives Foundation · Community Foundation Serving Southwest Colorado · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Thoren Family Charitable Trust · Westmeath Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · The Moniker Foundation · La Plata Electric Association Inc · Mile High United Way Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Team Up funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.