Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Tddb Bloomgarden Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232024.

Arts & Culture$9kHealth$8kHuman Services$5kReligion$5kScience & Tech$4kEducation$4kInternational$3kEmployment$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$297k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LA JEWISH HEALTH$5,000
GRIFFITH OBSERVATORY FNDTN$4,300
LA JEWISH HOME$1,800
CROSSROADS SCHOOL$1,000
GREATER LA ZOO ASSOC$1,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$1,000
VISTA DEL MAR$1,000
SHELTERS FOR ISRAEL$1,000
CHILDRENS LAW CENTER$1,000
JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICES$1,000
CITY OF HOPE$1,000
THE HUNTINGTON LIBRARY ART MUSEUM$500
VILALGE FOR VETS$500
JEWISH BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS$500
LARCHMONT CHARTER SCHOOL$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%VISTA DEL MAR: $1k → 14%UNITED IN HARMONY: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

37%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$16k · 10 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
5

Total granted

$16k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+25%

Still filing today

60%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEmploymentPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CROSSROADS SCHOOL FOR ARTS AND SCIENCES
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +10%
  • LS
    LARCHMONT SCHOOLS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +0%
  • VF
    VILLAGE FOR VETS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $750 · revenue +123%

Funded once

  • SC
    SKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +25%
  • AL
    ASSOCIATES LAJH
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • JS
    JVS SOCAL
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Mirman School for Gifted Children

We cultivate the boundless potential of highly gifted children, nurture their passions and talents, and develop a diverse community of creative and constructive lifelong learners.

Education
2
Communities in Schools of Los Angeles Inc

To surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life. we work with public school systems, establishing relationship with superintendents, principals, educators, and community partners to…

Youth Development
3
La Scuola International School

Inspire brave learners to shape the future.

Education
4
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

5
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
6
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
7
Irvine Hebrew Day School

Ihds utilizes a dual general and judaic studies curriculum. the judaic studies curriculum emphasizes the fundamentals of hebrew reading, writing and speaking, jewish history, holidays, jewish values, torah, the jewish life cycle, the land…

8
Vistamar School

Vistamar school empowers students, preparing them to contribute and excel in higher education and in life, and commits to: a broad and balanced program that challenges and engages students, building their individual skills and inspiring a…

Education
9
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

10
Luria Academy of Brooklyn

Luria academy is a child-centered environment dedicated to academic excellence and a sophisticated knowledge of jewish text and jewish heritage. located in the prospect heights neighborhood of brookly, luria academy is a jewish…

Education
11
Berkeley Hall School Foundation

Our mission is to "empower children to fulfill their unlimited, god-given potential as fearless scholars and conscientious citizens."

Education
12
Discovery Science Center of Los Angeles

We inspire and educate young minds through engaging science-based programs and exhibits to create a meaningful impact on the communities we serve.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vista Del Mar Child and Family Services and the most unlike its peers is Shelters for Israel. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LA JEWISH HEALTH — $5,000 · OtherLA JEWISH HEALTHASSOCIATES LAJH — $5,000 · OtherASSOCIATES LAJHLA JEWISH HOME — $4,400 · OtherLA JEWISH HOMEShelters for Israel — $2,000 · OtherShelters for IsraelCITY OF HOPE — $2,000 · OtherCITY OF HOPEPLANNED PARENTHOOD — $1,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODTHE HUNTINGTON LIBRARY ART MUSEUM — $1,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S LAW CENTER OF CALIFORNIA — $1,000 · OtherJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICES — $1,000 · OtherGREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $1,000 · Other+4 more — $2,050 · Other+4 moreSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER — $7,500 · Arts & CultureSKIRBALL CULTURAL …GRIFFITH OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION — $4,300 · Science & TechGRIFFITH O…CROSSROADS SCHOOL FOR ARTS AND SCIENCES — $2,000 · EducationLARCHMONT SCHOOLS — $1,500 · EducationVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES — $1,000 · Human ServicesUNITED IN HARMONY — $500 · Human ServicesALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES — $700 · HealthSharsheret Inc — $610 · HealthJVS SOCAL — $1,000 · Employment
Other$25,950Arts & Culture$7,500Science & Tech$4,300Education$3,500Human Services$1,500Health$1,310Employment$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRIFFITH OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION — $4,300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCROSSROADS SCHOOL FOR ARTS AND SCIENCES — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetShelters for Israel — $2,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLARCHMONT SCHOOLS — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S LAW CENTER OF CALIFORNIA — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJVS SOCAL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVILLAGE FOR VETS — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES — $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSharsheret Inc — $610 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED IN HARMONY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ralph M Parsons FoundationCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · California Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Tddb Bloomgarden Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Sharsheret Inc4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Tddb Bloomgarden Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Tddb Bloomgarden Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph