Skip to content

· Private foundation

Taylor-Wierda Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k
Granted FY2023
15
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2023 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k14 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$16k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$17,482
HUDSONVILLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION$7,436
IMPACT CHURCH$5,000
I UNDERSTAND LOVE HEALS$2,500
UNITY CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
GUIDING LIGHT MISSION$1,000
LAKESHORE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,000
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$1,000
ALL BELONG$1,000
HOLE IN THE WALL GANG CAMP$1,000
GATEWAY MISSION$1,000
GREAT LAKES REGION VOLLEYBALL$350
WEST SIDE RATTLERS BASEBALL ASSOCIA$250
Individual grant recipient$250
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%LAKESHORE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $1k → 8%GATEWAY MISSION: $1k → 10%HUGS RANCH: $2k → 11%HOLE IN THE WALL GANG CAMP: $1k → 12%GREAT LAKES REGION VOLLEYBALL: $350 → 7%WEST SIDE RATTLERS BASEBALL ASSOCIA: $250 → 8%I UNDERSTAND LOVE HEALS: $3k → 11%HUDSONVILLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $7k → 8%IMPACT CHURCH: $5k → 11%UNITY CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $2k → 8%ALL BELONG: $1k → 11%WGVU PUBLIC MEIA: $250 → 11%GUIDING LIGHT MISSION: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Great Lakes Intercollegiate Athletic Conference

To administer intercollegiate athletic programs for colleges and universities

Recreation & Sports
2
Sw Michigan Miracle League

Our mission is to provide opportunities for kids, regardless of their abilities, to compete and experience the joy and benefits that come from playing sports.

Recreation & Sports
3
Greater Lansing Youth for Christ

To communicate the relevance of the life-changing message of jesus christ to youth by example and word and challenging them to trust christ and to live for him.

—
4
Hg Lacrosse

The mission of hg lacrosse is to build a community that inspires and empowers players to excel in life and lacrosse.

Recreation & Sports
5
Lighthouse Family Retreat Inc

To provide respite for families caring for a child with cancer.

Health
6
Lifetime Housing Group Inc

Plan, coordinate and provide affordable housing to low-income individuals and families in Southeastern Indiana.

Food & Nutrition
7
Lake Area United Way Inc

Uniting people and resources to advance the health, education, and financial stability of our communities.

Philanthropy
8
Great Lakes Community Action Partnership

The mission of great lakes community action partnership is to create partnerships and opportunites to help individuals, families and communities thrive.

Human Services
9
Lake Havasu Soccer League

Soccer League - To teach soccer to kids ages 4-17

—
10
Greater Libertyville Soccer Association

The mission of the Greater Libertyville Soccer Association is to provide and promote a positive soccer experience for every participant appropriate to his or her level of interest and ability.

Recreation & Sports
11
Great Life Mentoring

Great Life Mentoring cultivates meaningful relationships where children facing adversity-and the adults who mentor them-live happier, healthier lives.

Youth Development
12
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Associationiowa Chapter

Leading the fight to treat and cure als through global research and nationwide advocacy while also empowering people with lou gehrig's disease and their families to live fuller lives by providing them with compassionate care and support.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Guiding Light Mission Inc; the most unlike its peers is Westside Rattlers Baseball Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $17,482 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHUDSONVILLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $7,436 · OtherHUDSONVILLE EDUCATION FOUNDATIONIMPACT CHURCH: $5,000 · OtherIMPACT CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+5 more: $3,600 · Other+5 moreI Understand Love Heals: $2,500 · HealthI Underst…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 · HealthBLOOD CAN…UNITY CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $2,000 · EducationALL BELONG: $1,000 · EducationHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsWestside Rattlers Baseball Association: $250 · Recreation & Sports
Other$35,518Health$3,500Education$3,000Recreation & Sports$1,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetI Understand Love Heals: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUNITY CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING LIGHT MISSION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKESHORE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALL BELONG: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGreat Lakes Region Volleyball Assn: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWestside Rattlers Baseball Association: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area IncMI13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc · Barnabas Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Taylor-Wierda Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Taylor-Wierda Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Taylor-Wierda Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Taylor-Wierda Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Taylor-Wierda’s filings →

    More from the funding graph