Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tatman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$89k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$159kPublic Safety & Disaster$153kHealth$69kReligion$63kFood & Nutrition$57kArts & Culture$52kPhilanthropy$47kEnvironment$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
$1,600
Median grant
5
States reached
$756k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Association For Rescue At Sea$15,000
GATEWAY FOOD PANTRY$10,300
EPHRAIM FIRE RESCUE ASSOCIATION$10,000
LifeWiseSTL$6,000
URBAN LEAGUE OF ST LOUIS$5,000
NORTHERN DOOR CHILDRENS CENTER$5,000
FOLDS OF HONOR$5,000
MITRATA NEPAL FOUNDATION$5,000
Ready Readers$5,000
RITENOUR COCARE FOOD PANTRY$3,000
DOOR COUNTY FOOD PANTRY$2,700
St Vincent de Paul Society$2,600
Milwaukee Rescue Mission$2,100
Tunnel To Towers Fndt$1,600
KINSHIP COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NORTHERN DOOR CHILDRENS CENTER: $10k → 8%NORTHERN DOOR CHILDRENS CENTER: $5k → 8%Northern Door Children's Center: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
CT
MO
MD
KS
TN
SC
DC
HI
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Tatman Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Tatman Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 8.4% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$265k · 20 repeat orgs$375k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against -9% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
30

Total granted

$265k
$346k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
-9%

Still filing today

45%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEnvironmentArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ND
    NORTHERN DOOR CHILDRENS CENTER INC
    3× · 2021–2025 · $20k · revenue +19%
  • OD
    OPEN DOOR ANIMAL SANCTUARY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +12%
  • EM
    EPHRAIM MENS CLUB
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +156%

Funded once

  • GS
    Good Samaritan Society-Scandia Viil
    one grant, 2021 · $75k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • CR
    CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Door County Economic Development Corporation

Dcedc is a public/private partnership dedicated to improving the economic vitality of the county and its residents. dcedc has been successful in helping existing businesses create and retain thousands of jobs through a myriad of programs…

Community Improvement
2
Disability Rights Wisconsin Inc

Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.

—
3
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
4
Help of Door County Inc

The mission of help of door county, inc. is to eliminate domestic abuse through prevention and intervention services and to advocate for social change.

Health
5
The Open Door

The open door is a leading hunger-relief organization serving dakota county, minnesota, where food insecurity is a growing challenge. the open door is dedicated to ending local hunger by providing access to healthy, fresh, and nutritious…

Food & Nutrition
6
Dubuque County Historical Society

To inspire stewardship by creating educational experiences where history and rivers come alive.

Arts & Culture
7
West Bend Community Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
8
Disability Rights Washington

Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.

Human Services
9
Wisconsin Maritime Museum Inc

The wisconsin maritime museum connects all people with wisconsin's waterways, by engaging and educating the public about wisconsin's maritime history, wisconsin's world war ii submarines, uss cobia, and the great lakes. the wisconsin…

Arts & Culture
10
St Louis Community Foundation

To promote the possibilities of charitable giving, helping charitable citizens understand how they can effectively provide for the community they love and the causes they care deeply about.

Philanthropy
11
Door County Memorial Hospital

Our mission as a health care system is to further the healing ministry of jesus christ by improving the health and well-being of our community, especially those in need.

Health
12
United Way Manitowoc County Inc

United way's mission is to improve lives.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Door County Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Noble Neighbor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
10/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASSOCIATION FOR RESCUE AT SEA INC: $90,000 · OtherASSOCIATION FOR RESCUE AT SEA INCGood Samaritan Society-Scandia Viil: $75,000 · OtherGood Samaritan Society-Scandia ViilIndividual grant recipient: $50,050 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $50,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESPeninsula Players Theatre: $30,000 · OtherPeninsula Players TheatreNorthern Door County YMCA: $21,000 · OtherEPHRAIM MORAVIAN CHURCH: $17,500 · Other+39 more: $190,562 · Other+39 moreDOOR COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $7,000 · PhilanthropyDOOR CANCER INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyEPHRAIM MENS CLUB: $10,000 · EducationFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $7,500 · EducationREADY READERS: $6,750 · EducationWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $1,104 · Education+1 more: $100 · EducationCROSSROADS AT BIG CREEK INC: $20,000 · EnvironmentDOOR COUNTY LAND TRUST INC: $1,500 · EnvironmentKINGDOM HOUSE D/B/A LIFEWISE STL: $21,250 · Youth DevelopmentNORTHERN DOOR CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $20,000 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesDOOR COUNTY MARITIME MUSEUM & LIGHTHOUSE PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureHEARTLAND ART CLUB: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$524,112Philanthropy$49,000Education$25,454Environment$21,500Youth Development$21,250Human Services$20,100Arts & Culture$16,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASSOCIATION FOR RESCUE AT SEA INC: $90,000 over 6y, 26% of budgetDOOR COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetKINGDOM HOUSE D/B/A LIFEWISE STL: $21,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSROADS AT BIG CREEK INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetNORTHERN DOOR CHILDRENS CENTER INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetDOOR COUNTY MARITIME MUSEUM & LIGHTHOUSE PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOPEN DOOR ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $11,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetEPHRAIM FIRE - RESCUE ASSOCIATION: $10,100 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREADY READERS: $6,750 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetDOOR COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOOR CANCER INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetDOOR COUNTY LAND TRUST INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $1,104 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTLAND ART CLUB: $1,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetGRAND AVENUE CLUB INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Noble Neighbor: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR RESCUE AT SEA INC ↗
  • Who funds DOOR COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KINGDOM HOUSE D/B/A LIFEWISE STL ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS AT BIG CREEK INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN DOOR CHILDRENS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds DOOR COUNTY MARITIME MUSEUM & LIGHTHOUSE PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds EPHRAIM FIRE - RESCUE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
  • Who funds EPHRAIM MENS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds READY READERS ↗
  • Who funds DOOR COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Door County Community Foundation IncWI22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Door County Community Foundation Inc · Mmg Foundation Inc · Ellsworth and Carla Peterson Charitable Foundation · Charles & Marcia Larsenanthony & Priscilla Beadell Foundation · Hislop Family Foundation · Lutsey Family Foundation · Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · Cordon Family Foundation Charitable Trust · Bernal T Chomeau Private Foundation · Curt and Sue Culver Family Foundation Inc · Dwight and Linda Davis Foundation · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tatman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tatman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tatman’s filings →

More from the funding graph