· Private foundation
Curt and Sue Culver Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k26 grants · $50k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $545k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITED WAY GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC | $107,000 |
| META HOUSE INC | $100,000 |
| HISTORIC HAYMARKET MILWAUKEE I INC | $75,000 |
| EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION | $62,500 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| IMMOKOLEE FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| SECUREFUTURES FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| MIDWEST ATHLETES AGAINST CHILDHOOD CANCER INC (MACC FUND) | $5,000 |
| ST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY | $5,000 |
| EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| NETWORK OF ENLIGHTENED WOMEN INC | $5,000 |
| SOUTHWEST FLORIDA CEO | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
40 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION5× · 2019–2024 · $383k · revenue +21%
- TITHE IMMOKALEE FOUNDATION INC5× · 2020–2024 · $203k · revenue +67%
META HOUSE INC2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue +16%
Funded once
UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INCone grant, 2019 · $16k · revenue -26%- BCBLOOD CANCER UNITED INCone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -25%
- BUBADGERS UNITED INCone grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue -92%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.
Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.
To promote the enjoyment and involvement in the game of golf and to contribute to the growth of the golf professional and the golf industry. the wisconsin section will accomplish this mission by enhancing the skills of golf professionals…
The uw-green bay foundation furthers the mission of uw-green bay, a public university, by developing and increasing opportunities for students primarily in the areas other than those in which the state of wisconsin ordinarily makes…
Support research and innovation at the university of wisconsin - milwaukee by providing reserach funding, entrepreneurship support, and by engaging in corporate partnering activities to that end.
The mission of the milwaukee bar association is to be an inclusive, equitable and diverse organization that serves the interests of the lawyers, judges and the people of milwaukee county by working to promote the professional interests of…
The wisconsin maritime museum connects all people with wisconsin's waterways, by engaging and educating the public about wisconsin's maritime history, wisconsin's world war ii submarines, uss cobia, and the great lakes. the wisconsin…
The milwaukee institute of art and design's mission is to ignite curious minds through art, design and service. we value courage to seek our own path, integrity to pursue our lives and work with meaning, kindness to thoughtfully engage…
University school of milwaukee cultivates excellence in learning, leadership, and citizenship for prekindergarten through 12th grade students. students are engaged, known, and valued within our passionate independent school community…
The mission of the organization is to provide a high quality education for all students with choices after graduation that will provide financial stability, inspire personal freedom to builda legacy.
To cultivate civil discourse, increase understanding, and create common ground by connecting wisconsin people and ideas.
United way of wisconsin is dedicated to supporting and enriching a strong statewide united way network that maximizes the capacity of local united ways to address human needs, improve lives and create lasting positive change across…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is First Stage Milwaukee and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE IMMOKALEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds META HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Historic Haymarket Milwaukee Inc ↗
- Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds THE UWM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds American Junior Golf Association Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF DOOR COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE BALLET COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds MIDWEST ATHLETES AGAINST CHILDHOOD CANCER INC ↗
- Who funds LIFE NAVIGATORS INC ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN STATE GOLF ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds SECUREFUTURES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST FLORIDA CEO ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF WISCONSIN ART INC ↗
- Who funds NAPLES TAKE A SOLDIER FISHING INC ↗
- Who funds SERENITY INNS INC ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds ST AUGUSTINE PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds BADGERS UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds TALL PINES CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds CHENEQUA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NETWORK OF ENLIGHTENED WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds FEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds ACADEMY OF BASIC EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF PENINSULA STATE PARK INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN DOOR CHILDRENS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HIRE HEROES USA INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER DELAFIELD COMMUNITY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds CADDIE & LEADERSHIP ACADEMY OF SE WI INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Anon Charitable Trust · Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc · Waukesha County Community Foundation · The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Curt and Sue Culver Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Curt and Sue Culver Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Curt and Sue Culver Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.