Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Tartan Area Youth Enrichment

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$509k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$191k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$1.5MRecreation & Sports$462kCommunity Improvement$139kHuman Services$97kArts & Culture$62kYouth Development$36kReligion$6k
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $213k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $251k
$11,460
Median grant
4
States reached
$177k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HIGHER EDUCATION ASSOCIATION$191,369
DELASALLE HIGH SCHOOL$59,316
ALL OTHERS UNDER 5000 - EDUCATION$34,205
LEGACY PARENTS BOOSTER CLUB$25,469
ALL OTHERS UNDER 5000 - YOUTH ATHLETICS$22,344
Individual grant recipient$21,432
ST THOMAS ACADEMY$18,731
ST MARY'S UNIVERSITY OF MN$18,224
Individual grant recipient$16,519
ALL OTHERS UNDER 5000 - COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT$13,919
ST CROIX LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL$11,460
YMCA OF THE NORTH$10,442
CRETIN DERHAM HALL$10,407
GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY$10,147
Individual grant recipient$9,478
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%YMCA OF THE NORTH: $10k → 6%YMCA of the North: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ND
MN
WI
MI
NY
CO
MO
AZ

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 24 repeat orgs$361k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
18

Total granted

$1.9M
$300k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+33%

Still filing today

21%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EM
    EAST METRO STARS YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $28k · revenue +73%
  • CY
    CROSSFIRE YOUTH SPORTS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $22k · revenue +12%
  • UO
    University of St Thomas
    2× · 2019–2024 · $16k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • AO
    All others under 5000
    one grant, 2017 · $84k
  • Y
    YDPA
    one grant, 2018 · $42k
  • AO
    All Others Under 5000 Youth Athle
    one grant, 2024 · $36k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
George Fox University

George fox university, a christ centered community, prepares students spiritually, academically, and professionally to think with clarity, act with integrity, and serve with passion.

Education
3
University of Mount Union

The university affirms the institution's mission to prepare students for fulfilling lives, meaningful work and responsible citizenship. the university of mount union offers undergraduate and graduate degrees in a wide array of academic…

Education
4
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
5
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

6
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

7
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
8
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
9
Northwestern Health Sciences University

Northwestern health sciences university prepares and serves the next generation of professionals and leaders to become vital contributors to the delivery and advancement of health care. our mission is accomplished through educational…

Education
10
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
11
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
12
North Central University

North central university is a christian university with a commitment to academic excellence.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of St Thomas and the most unlike its peers is Stillwater Area Hockey Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HIGHER EDUCATION ASSOCIATION — $733,908 · OtherHIGHER EDUCATION ASSOCIATIONALL OTHERS UNDER 5000- EDUCATION — $257,513 · OtherALL OTHERS UNDER 5000- EDUCATIONDELASALLE HIGH SCHOOL — $165,373 · OtherDELASALLE HIGH SCHOOLALL OTHERS UNDER 5000- YOUTH ATHLETICS — $162,377 · OtherALL OTHERS UNDER 5000- YOUTH ATHLETICSIndividual grant recipient — $96,663 · OtherAll others under 5000 — $84,399 · OtherYMCA — $76,102 · Other+32 more — $614,786 · Other+32 moreUniversity of St Thomas — $16,151 · EducationMINNEHAHA ACADEMY — $15,285 · EducationGrand Canyon University — $10,147 · EducationREGIS UNIVERSITY — $9,655 · EducationCornell University — $7,000 · EducationST LOUIS UNIVERSITY — $5,139 · EducationCROSSFIRE YOUTH SPORTS — $21,598 · Recreation & SportsMAPLEWOOD FIGURE SKATING CLUB INC — $5,199 · Recreation & SportsYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTH — $20,735 · Human Services
Other$2,191,121Education$63,377Recreation & Sports$26,797Human Services$20,735

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEAST METRO STARS YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION — $27,816 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetCROSSFIRE YOUTH SPORTS — $21,598 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTH — $20,735 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of St Thomas — $16,151 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMINNEHAHA ACADEMY — $15,285 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGrand Canyon University — $10,147 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGIS UNIVERSITY — $9,655 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTILLWATER AREA HOCKEY ASSOCIATION — $5,714 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMAPLEWOOD FIGURE SKATING CLUB INC — $5,199 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY — $5,139 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EAST METRO STARS YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds CROSSFIRE YOUTH SPORTS
  • Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTH
  • Who funds University of St Thomas
  • Who funds MINNEHAHA ACADEMY
  • Who funds Grand Canyon University
  • Who funds REGIS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Cornell University

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saint Paul & Minnesota FoundationMN12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Baird Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Tartan Area Youth Enrichment funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tartan Area Youth Enrichment?

    Find your warmest path to Tartan Area Youth Enrichment through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph