· Private foundation
Tariq and Asma Farid Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $125k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ZAYTUNA COLLEGE | $200,000 |
| YAQUEEN INSTITUTE FOR ISLAMIC RESEARCH | $50,000 |
| WELLSTAR FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL AID | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC | $20,000 |
| ORGANIZATION OF PAKISTANI ENTREPRENEURS | $10,000 |
| CONNECTICUT IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COALITION INC | $10,000 |
| EVERY CHILD COUNTS | $10,000 |
| SALMA KHATOON FOUNDATION | $7,998 |
| AL EHSAN WELFARE SOCIETY | $5,107 |
| WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF CONNECTICUT | $3,000 |
| NOOR FAMILY SERVICES CORPORATION | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $247k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ZCZaytuna College Inc4× · 2019–2024 · $500k · revenue +99%
MAP International Inc2× · 2022–2023 · $100k · revenue +120%- NANEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS INC2× · 2021–2023 · $39k · revenue +167%
Funded once
- RCROSWELL COMMUNITY MASJID INCone grant, 2020 · $400k
- MAMUSLIM ALLIANCE IN NORTH AMERICAone grant, 2021 · $100k
- FOFRIENDS OF KDSP INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $60k · revenue +75%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Human Rights Project
To Facilitate Coexistence globally by promoting and rewarding collaborative work in the preservation and promotion of life, based on compassion. To encourage and assist people of all orientations to become true vicegerents of God on earth.
Ummah relief international is a dedicated grassroots relief organization providing humanitarian services to bring help and hope to thousands of victims of natural and human disasters with quick and targeted action.
Established to represent the american muslim community and to advocate for human rights, tolerance, and justice in the united state and the world, and to foster interfaith and interethnic understanding.
Aifd's mission is to advocate for the preservation of the founding principles of our u.s. constitution, liberty, and freedom, through the separation of mosque and state. public engagement program provides education to the general public on…
Zakat, aid and charity assisting humanity (zacah) is a minnesota-based grassroots organization dedicated to the collection and re-distribution of wealth, including zakat (mandatory charitable tax for all muslims) and sadaqah (any…
SEE PART 1, LINE A MISSION AND PRINCIPLESAdvocating universal individual human rights without exceptions, Advocating literacy and education as the cornerstones to personal development and true humanity, Empowering and supporting…
The ilf's mission is to make justice a reality for poor people by fighting to guarantee high-quality legal representation for everyone arrested or detained. around the world, we provide criminal defense services and build sustainable,…
Develop long-term developmental projects aimed at providing a sustainable living for poor communities as well as supporting needy widows and orphans
Karam foundation is dedicated to help people help themselves. we seek to restore the dignity and quality of life for people affected by conflict by eliminating barriers to success through innovative education, entrepreneurial development,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Azraq Education and Community Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is Islamic Center of Wallingford. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Zaytuna College Inc ↗
- Who funds MAP International Inc ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF KDSP INC ↗
- Who funds WELLSTAR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ISLAMIC CENTER OF WALLINGFORD ↗
- Who funds ISLAMIC NETWORKS INC ↗
- Who funds HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds International Aid Charity ↗
- Who funds BURMESE ROHINGYA COMMUNITY OF GEORGIA INC ↗
- Who funds NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS INC ↗
- Who funds SALMA KHATOON ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds Najam Institute Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW BRITAIN POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE COALITION ↗
- Who funds THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds Every Child Counts Inc ↗
- Who funds WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF CONNECTICUT INC ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Muslim Community Foundation · Islamic Relief USA · Raghib Family Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tariq and Asma Farid Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Connecticut Institute for Refugees and Immigrants Inc — 37% of income from government
- New Britain Police Athletic League Inc — 9% of income from government
- Connecticut Immigrant & Refugee Coalition — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Tariq and Asma Farid Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Tariq and Asma Farid Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.