Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tanimura Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$399k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$1.2MHealth$950kReligion$570kFood & Nutrition$270kPhilanthropy$200kPublic Safety & Disaster$175kHuman Services$170kYouth Development$130kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $171k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $200k
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$22M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CASA OF MONTEREY COUNTY$50,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$50,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$50,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$50,000
VENTANA WILDLIFE SOCIETY$30,000
JAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM$26,000
HARTNELL COLLEGE FOUNDATION$25,000
CENTER FOR LAND-BASED LEARNING$25,000
CENTRAL COAST YMCA$20,000
CENTRAL COAST VNA AND HOSPICE$15,000
LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$10,000
ARIEL THEATRICAL$10,000
HOSPICE GIVING FOUNDATION$10,000
FOOD SHARE VENTURA COUNTY$5,000
YUMA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $315k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50k → 10%HARMONY AT HOME: $25k → 14%HOSPICE GIVING FOUNDATION: $25k → 12%HOSPICE GIVING FOUNDATION: $25k → 12%HOSPICE GIVING FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 12%ALLIANCE ON AGING: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 29 repeat orgs$391k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
17

Total granted

$3.8M
$365k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
0%

Still filing today

79%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    UNIVERSITY CORPORATION AT MONTEREY BAY
    3× · 2021–2024 · $350k · revenue +94%
  • HC
    HARTNELL COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $310k · revenue +31%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $275k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF MONTEREY COUNTY
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -91%
  • IO
    INSTITUTE OF BUDDHIST STUDIESgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $70k · revenue +88%
  • BG
    Boys & Girls Clubs of Monterey County
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue -18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
2
Community Hospital of the Monterey Peninsula

Community hospital of the monterey peninsula is dedicated to identifying and meeting the changing healthcare needs of the people of the monterey peninsula and surrounding communities.we are committed to providing high-quality services at a…

Health
3
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
4
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
—
5
Monterey Bay United
Recreation & Sports
6
Second Harvest Food Bank Santa Cruz County

Second harvest food bank's mission is to end hunger and malnutrition by educating and involving the community.

Food & Nutrition
7
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
8
Marin Community Foundation

Mobilizing the power of community and the resources of philanthropy to advance equity for people, places and the planet.

Philanthropy
9
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
10
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
11
Monterey Bay Fisheries Trust

To ensure sustainable fisheries, resilient communities and a healthy ocean for years to come.

Animals
12
Foundation of California State University Monterey Bay

To further the scientific, literary, educational and charitable purposes of california state university, monterey bay, including fundraising, development, endowment management, financial assistance, public relations and other support.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation for Monterey County; the most unlike its peers is Monterey County Interfaith Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
18/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HARTNELL COLLEGE: $300,000 · OtherHARTNELL COLLEGEBUDDHIST TEMPLE OF SALINAS: $275,000 · OtherBUDDHIST TEMPLE OF SALINASAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $225,000 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYFOOD BANK FOR MONTEREY COUNTY: $200,000 · OtherFOOD BANK FOR MONTEREY COUNTYBUDDHIST CHURCHES OF AMERICA: $200,000 · OtherBUDDHIST CHURCHES OF AMERICABOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $75,000 · OtherCenter for Land-Based Learning: $60,000 · Other+20 more: $383,000 · Other+20 moreUNIVERSITY CORPORATION AT MONTEREY BAY: $350,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY CORPORATION AT …HARTNELL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $310,000 · EducationHARTNELL COLLEGE FOUNDATIO…READ TO ME PROJECT: $260,000 · EducationREAD TO ME PROJECTINSTITUTE OF BUDDHIST STUDIES: $70,000 · EducationINSTITUTE OF BUDDHIST STUD…NATIVIDAD MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $320,000 · HealthNATIVIDAD MEDICAL FO…American Heart Association Inc: $275,242 · HealthAmerican Heart Assoc…COASTAL KIDS HOME CARE: $100,000 · HealthCOASTAL KIDS HOME CA…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $45,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED …+2 more: $50,000 · Health+2 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $225,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE GIVING FOUNDATION: $60,000 · Human ServicesHARMONY AT HOME: $25,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY COUNTY: $100,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF MONTEREY COUNTY: $100,000 · PhilanthropyCourt Appointed Special Advocates of Monterey County Inc: $170,000 · Crime & LegalMONTEREY MUSEUM OF ART: $55,000 · Arts & CultureJAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM: $26,000 · Arts & CultureARIEL THEATRICAL INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureEL SISTEMA USASALINAS INC: $7,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,718,000Education$990,000Health$790,242Human Services$315,000Philanthropy$200,000Crime & Legal$170,000Arts & Culture$108,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY CORPORATION AT MONTEREY BAY: $350,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNATIVIDAD MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $320,000 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetHARTNELL COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $310,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $275,242 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetREAD TO ME PROJECT: $260,000 over 4y, 18% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $225,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR MONTEREY COUNTY: $200,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCourt Appointed Special Advocates of Monterey County Inc: $170,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY COUNTY: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MONTEREY COUNTY: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOASTAL KIDS HOME CARE: $100,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetINSTITUTE OF BUDDHIST STUDIES: $70,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetHOSPICE GIVING FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetCenter for Land-Based Learning: $60,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMONTEREY MUSEUM OF ART: $55,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetVENTANA WILDLIFE SOCIETY: $45,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL COAST YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFUTURE CITIZENS FOUNDATION DBA THE FIRST TEE OF MONTEREY COUNTY: $33,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetJAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM: $26,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYUMA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD SHARE INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL COAST VNA & HOSPICE INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Monterey County: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHARMONY AT HOME: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetRANCHO CIELO INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetJACOBS HEART CHILDRENS CANCER SUPPORT SERVICES: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOOD BANK: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIEL THEATRICAL INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budget5 LOAVES FOOD PANTRY: $15,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetMAX'S HELPING PAWS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetEL SISTEMA USASALINAS INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetALLIANCE ON AGING INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMonterey County Interfaith Alliance: $5,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetBig Sur Land Trust: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Monterey Peninsula FoundationCA48.8× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Monterey Peninsula Foundation · Nancy Buck Ransom Foundation · Barnet Segal Charitable Trust · Pebble Beach Company Foundation · Sally Hughes Church Foundation · Dunspaugh Dalton Foundation Inc · Andrew & Phyllis D'Arrigo Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation Santa Cruz County · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Community Hospital of the Monterey Peninsula · Nancy Eccles and Homer M Hayward Family Foundation · Hospice Giving Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tanimura Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tanimura Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tanimura Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Tanimura Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tanimura Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph