How much did HOSPICE GIVING FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

HOSPICE GIVING FOUNDATION reported 10 grants totaling $1,034,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is HOSPICE GIVING FOUNDATION based?

HOSPICE GIVING FOUNDATION is based in CA.

HOSPICE GIVING FOUNDATION

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

HOSPICE GIVING FOUNDATION

Hospice Giving Foundation believes in living fully and dying peacefully.

$1.0M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$210k

Largest

01What you fund

0181% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.

Health$5.1MHuman Services$732kEducation$60kCrime & Legal$53kPhilanthropy$50kArts & Culture$30kOther$1.4M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

loss transitionend

2020

loss transitionend

2021

casaschildrensenddiverse

2022

end

2023

endchildren's

2024

pediatriccancercoasthealth

2025

coast vnagriefpediatricmontereycancerhealth

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k2 grants · $60k
$50k–250k8 grants · $974k

$100,000

Median grant

States reached

$33M

Total assets

Largest grants

Central Coast VNA$210,000
Coastal Kids Home Care$160,000
Jacobs Heart$125,000
Salinas Valley Health Fndtn$110,000
Natividad Medical Foundation$100,000
Jerry Rubin Foundation$90,000
Montage Health Foundation$90,000
Partnership for Children$89,000
Hospice of Santa Cruz County$40,000
Alzheimers Association$20,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $732k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$6.8M · 13 repeat orgs$655k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$6.8M

$425k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%

+110%

Still filing today

69%

88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $230k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalPhilanthropyEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CK
Coastal Kids Home Care
7× · 2018–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +1171%
PF
Partnership for Children
7× · 2018–2024 · $689k · revenue +89% · 30% of their budget
JH
Jacobs Heart
7× · 2018–2024 · $659k · revenue +326%

Funded once

CH
Cmty Hospital Mtry Peninsulagraduated
one grant, 2018 · $225k · revenue +538%
C
CSUMBgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $60k · revenue +57%
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MONTEREY COUNTYgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +131%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Hospital Council of N & C California

To provide membership services, local level issue management, education, shared services, research, media support & consultation to northern california hospitals.

—

Pacific Central Coast Health Centers

To provide access to cost effective, quality medical services in the northern santa barbara county, san luis obispo county, kern county and ventura county communities.

Health

Community Hospital of the Monterey

Improving lives by delivering exceptional care and inspiring the pursuit of optimal health.

Health

Cascadia Health

Cascadia health delivers whole health care - integrated mental health and addiction services, primary care, and housing - to support our communities and provide hope and well-being for those we serve.

Health

California Association of Hospitals and

Education and representation before legislative and regulatory bodies for member hospitals.

—

Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

the organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the UCSF Foundation.

Education

Coalition for Compassionate Care

Our mission is to make conversations about serious illness a part of everyday life and palliative care a part of everyday health care.

Health

California Hospitals Committee on Issues

To participate in and educate the public about health issues and ballot proposition activity related to health issues or of concern to hospitals and health systems.

—

Valley Children's Healthcare

To support health care activities and programs and to provide health care services to children and adults in central california with diseases, disorders and other health problems of pediatric origin.

Health

Comprehensive Community Health Centers

Cchc mission is to ensure the health and wellness of each individual so every person may reach their fullest human potential within a caring environment.

Health

California Health Foundation and Trust

Support access, research, and education in the healthcare field

Philanthropy

Usc Care Medical Group Inc

To promote health by engaging in the practice of medicine for patients of hospitals affiliated with the university of southern california keck school of medicine and elsewhere. to provide medical care to the sick and injured who may come…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of Santa Cruz County and the most unlike its peers is Tides Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

18/19

Grantees still filing

15/19

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$5,061,939Other$1,434,173Human Services$731,500Education$60,000Crime & Legal$52,592Philanthropy$50,000Arts & Culture$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Monterey Peninsula FoundationCA31× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Monterey Peninsula Foundation · Pebble Beach Company Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Community Foundation Santa Cruz · Barnet Segal Charitable Trust · Tanimura Family Foundation · Alexander F Victor Foundation · Pajaro Valley Community Health Trust · Community Hospital of the Monterey · Community Foundation For · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation HOSPICE GIVING FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Jerry Rubin Foundation.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~9 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 4 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 515.7× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 863477976 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Jerry Rubin Foundation, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 9 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 95% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Hospice Giving Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Hospice Giving Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

HOSPICE GIVING FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Hospice Giving Foundation?

More from the funding graph

HOSPICE GIVING FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Hospice Giving Foundation?

More from the funding graph