Skip to content

· Public charity

Tahdah Foundation

The mission of tahdah is to improve the hearts, the minds, and lives of young people with resources that support holistic arts education and wellbeing.

$105k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$87kEducation$86kHuman Services$15kHousing & Shelter$13kYouth Development$9kHealth$6k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $67,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $105,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $37,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $53k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$142k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARTOGETHER$12,500
FARMDALE PTO$10,000
SEBASTOPOL CENTER FOR THE ARTS$10,000
ARTS BRIDGING THE GAP$10,000
ARTREACH$10,000
YOUTH ART EXCHANGE$7,500
JUNIOR CENTER OF ART AND SCIENCE$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YOUTH ART EXCHANGE: $8k → 10%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOC OF METRPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$114k · 6 repeat orgs$93k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
10

Total granted

$114k
$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+8%

Still filing today

50%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • A
    ARTREACH
    3× · 2022–2025 · $24k · revenue +104%
  • NO
    NORTH OAKLAND COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL
    2× · 2017–2019 · $23k · revenue -2%
  • AB
    ARTS BRIDGING THE GAP
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • PN
    PHIPPS NEIGHBORHOODS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue +8%
  • SF
    San Francisco Bay Area Theatre Company
    one grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue 0%
  • BA
    BAY AREA COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue -2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arts for Oakland Kids

To advance arts justice by ensuring that all students in under-resourced oakland public schools receive a comprehensive arts education in order to improve learning and promote achievement.

Arts & Culture
2
Youth in Arts

Youth in Arts builds visual and performing arts skills through innovative and in-depth programs that foster confidence, compassion and resilience in students of all abilities. We develop capacity among educators and teaching artists,…

Arts & Culture
3
Museum of Childrens Art

The Museum of Children's Art (MOCHA) in Oakland aims to ensure the arts are a fundamental part of the community by providing quality, hands-on art experiences, particularly for children at risk academically or in underserved areas. Their…

Arts & Culture
4
San Francisco High School of the Arts

San Francisco Arts and Science Academy (ASA) provides TK5 grade students with a strong foundation in the arts, language, math, and science, fostering creativity, curiosity, and character development. Our bilingual, hands-on curriculum…

Education
5
San Francisco Arts Education Project

The San Francisco Arts Education Project provides participatory experiences in the arts to the children of San Francisco so they are better equipped to make use of their creative abilities in all aspects of their lives.

Arts & Culture
6
Oakland School for the Arts

To establish and maintain a positive school culture in which all students are motivated to learn, support each other, and have structures in place that assist students in accessing their full artistic and academic potential.

Education
7
Occidental Center for the Arts

Occidental Center for the Arts exists to provide a welcoming and accessible venue for the performing and visual arts in Sonoma County California for local regional national and international artists. our mission is to enrich our community…

Arts & Culture
8
Lead Liberated

Through coaching and group facilitation, leaders of color heal from racism, develop skills to identify & interrupt racism in personal leadership, organizational practices & policies, and produce antiracist solutions in partnership with…

Education
9
Open Arts Alliance Inc

Open Arts Alliance empowers youth through performing arts education in a supportive environment fostering creativity, confidence and self expression. Our programs nurture the next generation of leaders both on and off the stage while…

Health
10
California School-Age Consortium Inc

The California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) builds professional networks that provide training, leadership development and advocacy to ensure that all young people have access to high quality out-of-school time programs and to create a…

—
11
Californians for the Arts

Our mission at Californians for the Arts is to ensure that the arts are accessible to all Californians; are an ongoing part of the public dialogue and to encourage Californians to care about the arts as a critical component of their own…

Arts & Culture
12
Arts Education Connection San Diego

Arts Education Connection San Diego engages professional teaching artists to provide high-quality arts education programs in all art forms for students, educators, families and communities, advocating for, leading and advancing education…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Junior Center of Art and Science; the most unlike its peers is We Lead Ours. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FARMDALE PARENT TEACHER ORGANIZATION: $17,500 · OtherFARMDALE PARENT TEACHER ORGANIZATIONHILDA L SOLIS LEARNING ACADEMY: $15,000 · OtherHILDA L SOLIS LEARNING ACADEMYLOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $15,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTPHIPPS NEIGHBORHOODS INC: $12,500 · OtherPHIPPS NEIGHBORHOODS INCKENLIVLLC: $7,368 · OtherKENLIVLLCOakland Youth Chorus: $5,000 · OtherOakland Youth ChorusGraystone Elementary School: $2,500 · OtherARTREACH: $24,125 · Arts & CultureARTREACHARTS BRIDGING THE GAP: $20,000 · Arts & CultureARTS BRIDGING THE GAPARTogether: $12,500 · Arts & CultureARTogetherSebastopol Center for the Arts: $10,000 · Arts & CultureSebastopol Center for the ArtsSan Francisco Bay Area Theatre Company: $7,500 · Arts & CultureSan Francisco Bay Area Theatre CompanyNORTH OAKLAND COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL: $22,500 · EducationNORTH OAKLAND COMMU…The Junior Center of Art and Science: $7,500 · EducationThe Junior Center o…ASPIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $6,000 · EducationASPIRE PUBLIC SCHOO…BAY AREA COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $7,500 · HealthPUENTES DE SALUD: $5,750 · HealthTIDES CENTER: $7,500 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles: $3,500 · Human ServicesWE LEAD OURS: $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$74,868Arts & Culture$74,125Education$36,000Health$13,250Human Services$11,000Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARTREACH: $24,125 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetNORTH OAKLAND COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL: $22,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetARTS BRIDGING THE GAP: $20,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetARTogether: $12,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetPHIPPS NEIGHBORHOODS INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Junior Center of Art and Science: $7,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSan Francisco Bay Area Theatre Company: $7,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBAY AREA COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASPIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUENTES DE SALUD: $5,750 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOakland Youth Chorus: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWE LEAD OURS: $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Bay Community FoundationCA14.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Bay Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Kenneth Rainin Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tahdah Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tahdah Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tahdah Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Tahdah Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tahdah’s filings →

    More from the funding graph