Skip to content
Tabgha Love Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Tabgha Love Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$29kYouth Development$14kScience & Tech$5kHealth$5kHuman Services$4kArts & Culture$3kReligion$2kFood & Nutrition$750Other$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$10k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Young Life$5,000
Global Citizens Initiative$1,979
BIBLICA INC$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Memorial Sloan Kettering GIVING$300
Food Rescue Us$250
Roundhill Community Center$200
Harvest Time Church$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KOREAN AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICE CENTER: $200 → 13%GREENWICH CENTER FOR HOPE AND RENEWAL: $300 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MT
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Tabgha Love Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Tabgha Love Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.9% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$40k · 11 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
18

Total granted

$40k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-3%
+14%

Still filing today

45%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesReligionYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    4× · 2020–2024 · $13k · revenue +62%
  • AP
    AZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2019–2020 · $11k · revenue -30%
  • BARNARD COLLEGE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $10k · revenue -3%

Funded once

  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +50%
  • CM
    CHILDRENS MUSEUM OF NEW YORK
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • JO
    Journey of Awesomeness Incorporated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
4
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
5
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
6
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
7
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
8
Goldey-Beacom College

Empowering learners to achieve excellence by linking knowledge to practice.

Education
9
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
10
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
11
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
12
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greenwich Academy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Journey of Awesomeness Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $11,220 · EducationAZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITYBARNARD COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationBARNARD COLLEGETRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $5,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGEPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $5,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard CollegeGLOBAL CITIZENS INITIATIVE INC: $1,979 · EducationGLOBAL CITIZENS INITIATIVE INC+2 more: $500 · EducationCHILDRENS MUSEUM OF NEW YORK: $2,500 · OtherCHILDRENS MUSEUM OF NEW YO…LILLY OF THE VALLEY: $1,860 · OtherLILLY OF THE VALLEYJourney of Awesomeness Incorporated: $1,000 · OtherJourney of Awesomeness Inc…HORIZONS NATIONAL: $1,000 · OtherHORIZONS NATIONALHEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $1,000 · OtherHEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION OF S…UPPER EAST SIDE PEDIATRICS: $820 · OtherUPPER EAST SIDE PEDIATRICSTRINITY CHURCH: $800 · OtherTRINITY CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $650 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $635 · OtherHSS DEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE: $555 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $500 · OtherWEILL CORNELL: $500 · OtherCENTER FOR MUSICAL EXCELLENCE INC: $500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $500 · Other+7 more: $1,750 · Other+7 moreYOUNG LIFE: $12,538 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFEFOOD RESCUE US INC: $750 · Food & NutritionBIBLICA INC: $500 · ReligionHIS HANDS ON AFRICA INC: $200 · ReligionGREENWICH CENTER FOR HOPE AND RENEWAL INC: $300 · Human ServicesThe Korean American Family Service Center Inc: $200 · Human ServicesHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $262 · Recreation & Sports
Education$33,699Other$14,570Youth Development$12,538Food & Nutrition$750Religion$700Human Services$500Recreation & Sports$262

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNG LIFE: $12,538 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $11,220 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBARNARD COLLEGE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL CITIZENS INITIATIVE INC: $1,979 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJourney of Awesomeness Incorporated: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD RESCUE US INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe President and Trustees of Colby College: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH CENTER FOR HOPE AND RENEWAL INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $262 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Korean American Family Service Center Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDRENS RESCUE MISSION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHIS HANDS ON AFRICA INC: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLIMATE RIDE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH ACADEMY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…Natl Christian Charit…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Network for GoodDonor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Philanthropic TrustPA10.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tabgha Love Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tabgha Love Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Tabgha Love Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Tabgha Love Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tabgha Love’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home