Skip to content

· Private foundation

Szilagyi Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$52kEnvironment$34kFood & Nutrition$24kYouth Development$20kArts & Culture$14kCommunity Improvement$10kHealth$9kReligion$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
8
States reached
$594k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HYDE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD CLUB$6,000
FRIENDS OF THE CHEAT$5,000
FOOD FOR PRESTON$2,050
WVU FOUNDATION$2,000
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$1,500
SERAPHIC FIRE$1,250
ROWLESBURG REVITALIZATION COMMITTEE$1,000
OBERLIN COLLEGE$1,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF KINGWOOD$1,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$700
ALZHEIMERS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$500
UNITED WAY OF MONONGALIA AND PRESTON COUNTIES$500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$500
UNCF$500
WVU FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SERAPHIC FIRE: $1k → 15%HYDE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD CLUB: $6k → 14%SERAPHIC FIRE: $1k → 15%FOOD FOR PRESTON: $7k → 14%HYDE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD CLUB: $1k → 14%SERAPHIC FIRE: $1k → 15%FOOD FOR PRESTON: $5k → 14%HYDE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD CLUB: $1k → 14%SERAPHIC FIRE: $1k → 15%HYDE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD CLUB: $1k → 14%SERAPHIC FIRE: $1k → 15%HYDE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD CLUB: $1k → 14%SERAPHIC FIRE: $1k → 15%HYDE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD CLUB: $1k → 14%SERAPHIC FIRE: $500 → 15%HYDE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD CLUB: $500 → 14%FOOD FOR PRESTON: $4k → 14%FOOD FOR PRESTON: $3k → 14%FOOD FOR PRESTON: $2k → 14%FOOD FOR PRESTON: $2k → 14%THE SAMARITAN WOMEN: $250 → 19%THE SAMARITAN WOMEN: $250 → 19%THE SAMARITAN WOMEN: $250 → 19%FOOD FOR PRESTON: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OH
WV
MD
NC
DC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$183k · 37 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
9

Total granted

$183k
$3k

Still filing today

59%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentPhilanthropyHealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $24k · revenue +8%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE CHEAT INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $24k · revenue +310%
  • FF
    FOOD FOR PRESTON INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $24k · revenue +197%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • JD
    JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH
    one grant, 2023 · $500
  • WP
    WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN
    one grant, 2019 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
2
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
3
Western Pennsylvania Conservancy

The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…

Environment
4
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
5
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
6
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
7
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
8
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
American Society of Civil Engineers Inc

To provide essential value to our members, their careers, our partners, and the public, asce will: facilitate the advancement of technology; encourage and provide the tools for lifelong learning; promote professionalism and the profession;…

Science & Tech
10
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
11
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners

Founded in 1889, the national association of regulatory utility commisioners (naruc) is a non-profit organization dedicated to representing the state public service commisions who regulate the utilities that provide essential services such…

—
12
University of Virginia Alumni Association

The mission of the alumni association is to build the strongest bond among alumni and between alumni and the university by serving all alumni and students; being the center for engaging and connecting the global uva community; acting as a…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Virginia University Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Baltimore Shakespeare Factory. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
19/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $24,350 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FO…OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $9,500 · EducationOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUND…Oberlin College: $8,332 · EducationOberlin CollegeUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $3,250 · EducationUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND I…FOOD FOR PRESTON INC: $23,550 · Human ServicesFOOD FOR PRESTON INCHYDE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD CLUB: $11,500 · Human ServicesHYDE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD CL…SERAPHIC FIRE INC: $6,750 · Human ServicesSERAPHIC FIRE INC+1 more: $750 · Human ServicesFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $5,000 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHHUNGARIAN SCOUT FUND: $4,700 · OtherHUNGARIAN SCOUT FUNDARTS COUNCIL OF PRESTON COUNTY: $4,200 · OtherARTS COUNCIL OF PRESTON COU…PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $3,800 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODUNIVERSITY OF AKRON: $2,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF AKRONKINGWOOD PUBLIC LIBRARY: $2,100 · OtherPRESTON COUNTY 4-H: $2,000 · OtherHAROLD AND SANDRA STUBBS SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $1,700 · OtherMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 · OtherMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES US…AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · OtherAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UN…+21 more: $13,700 · Other+21 moreFRIENDS OF THE CHEAT INC: $24,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE CHEA…American Whitewater: $5,000 · EnvironmentAmerican WhitewaterWEST VIRGINIA RIVERS COALITION INC: $2,500 · EnvironmentWEST VIRGINIA RIVER…ROWLESBURG REVITALIZATION COMMITTEE INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF MONONGALIA AND PRESTON COUNITES INC: $3,000 · PhilanthropyALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $3,500 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $1,500 · HealthSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $3,250 · Crime & Legal
Education$45,432Human Services$42,550Other$45,700Environment$31,500Philanthropy$13,000Health$5,000Crime & Legal$3,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $24,350 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHEAT INC: $24,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD FOR PRESTON INC: $23,550 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetHYDE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD CLUB: $11,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetROWLESBURG REVITALIZATION COMMITTEE INC: $10,000 over 7y, 11% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $9,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOberlin College: $8,332 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSERAPHIC FIRE INC: $6,750 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Whitewater: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $3,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $3,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MONONGALIA AND PRESTON COUNITES INC: $3,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA RIVERS COALITION INC: $2,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $1,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCedar Bog Association: $1,300 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR SURVIVOR CARE INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBALTIMORE SHAKESPEARE FACTORY: $700 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetHEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF BLACK DIAMOND COUNCIL INC: $500 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHEAT INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR PRESTON INC ↗
  • Who funds HYDE PARK NEIGHBORHOOD CLUB ↗
  • Who funds ROWLESBURG REVITALIZATION COMMITTEE INC ↗
  • Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Oberlin College ↗
  • Who funds SERAPHIC FIRE INC ↗
  • Who funds American Whitewater ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF MONONGALIA AND PRESTON COUNITES INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA RIVERS COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds Cedar Bog Association ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR SURVIVOR CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds BALTIMORE SHAKESPEARE FACTORY ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF BLACK DIAMOND COUNCIL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY9.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Szilagyi Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Szilagyi Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • American Whitewater: 5% of income from government
  • Health Care for the Homeless Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Seraphic Fire Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Szilagyi Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph