How much did Swinmurn Family Foundation grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 60% of Swinmurn Family Foundation’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

lavosiintegral heartmedicalgirlsnutritiontrainingguatemala

2019

wuqu kawoqgirlskaw ixqa'al

2020

covid responsefoodpurchasenutritionguatemalaliterary arts

2021

teacher's traininghealthy girlsgirls becomebecome strongstrong womenwomen kenyakenya uganda

2022

milk

2023

—

2024

phase

2025

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

$10k–50k1 grant · $40k
$250k+2 grants · $833k

$333,332

Median grant

States reached

$3.5M

Total assets

Largest grants

MERCY CORPS$500,000
MERCY CORPS$333,332
LITERARY ARTS INC$40,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $517k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$5.0M · 12 repeat orgs$267k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$5.0M

$267k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%

+77%

Still filing today

67%

80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

InternationalHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureMembership BenefitPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

MC
MERCY CORPS
4× · 2017–2020 · $1.2M · revenue +51%
WK
WUQU KAWOQ SA
5× · 2017–2021 · $467k · revenue +202%
LITERARY ARTS INC
6× · 2019–2025 · $210k · revenue +161%

Funded once

SN
SEMILLA NUEVAgraduated
one grant, 2017 · $110k · revenue +738%
SS
STREET SOCCER USA INCgraduated
one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +180%
UW
UNITED WAY OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIAgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +807%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Cultiva International Inc

We provide training, education and materials so local Mayan Guatemalan families can grown their own food in order to improve their familys nutrition and lift themselves out of poverty.

Environment

A Better Life Guatemala

Health

International Mayan League

A Mayan organization whose purpose is to promote, preserve, and transmit the cosmovision and worldview, culture, history, and contributions of our ancestors.

Civil Rights

International Hands in Service

Promote integrated health, healing, and education with mayan communities in guatemala by enabling access to health care and early childhood education.

International

Global Learning Exchange Initiative

To empower elementary school children in Guatemala by providing access to an unparalleled literacy curriculum and professional teacher training that creates new opportunity pathways for the next generation.

International

Mission Guatemala Inc

Our mission is to help meet the basic needs and improve the quality of life of underserved and impoverished guatemalan peoples through health, education and nutrition initiatives and missionary service.

Human Services

Mundo Exchange Inc

Charity. Mundo Exchange is a 501(c) (3) international volunteer organization whose mission is to transform the lives of children, families, and communities by tackling poverty and providing opportunities for equality. We do this through…

International

Natun Guatemala

Supporting maya indigenous communities in rural guatemala through funding educational, nutritional and sustainable development projects.

International

Natik Esperanza

Natiks mission is to partner with grassroots organizations that confront the educational, health, and economic disparities of marginalized communities in Guatemala and Mexico. All of mission goals contribute to the elimination of extreme…

International

One Equal Heart Foundation

One Equal Heart collaborates with indigenous leaders in Mexico to honor and nurture sustainable agriculture, equitable communities and traditional knowledge.

Philanthropy

Rainforest Alliance Holding Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

Environment

The Global Hunger Project

To create a world without hunger by facilitating individual and collective action to transform the systems of inequity that create hunger and cause it to persist.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Aid and the most unlike its peers is SMALLCHANGE4BIGCHANGE. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

16/16

Grantees still filing

9/16

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$3,171,565International$1,430,387Human Services$516,500Health$100,500Philanthropy$25,000Environment$25,000Food & Nutrition$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Globalgiving Foundation IncDC13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Globalgiving Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Swinmurn Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: LITTLE ONES RISING MINDS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 208720262 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on LITTLE ONES RISING MINDS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 27% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Swinmurn Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Swinmurn Family Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Swinmurn Family Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Swinmurn Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph

Swinmurn Family Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Swinmurn Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph