Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Swinmurn Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$873k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

International$4.4MHuman Services$467kHealth$211kArts & Culture$210kFood & Nutrition$110kYouth Development$90kRecreation & Sports$50kCivil Rights$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
  • $250k+2 grants · $833k
$333,332
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MERCY CORPS$500,000
MERCY CORPS$333,332
LITERARY ARTS INC$40,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $517k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WUQU KAWOQ SA: $110k → 9%WUQU KAWOQ SA: $100k → 9%STREET SOCCER USA INC: $50k → 17%WUQU KAWOQ SA: $60k → 9%WUQU KAWOQ SA: $60k → 9%WUQU KAWOQ SA: $30k → 9%WUQU KAWOQ SA: $30k → 9%WUQU KAWOQ SA: $25k → 9%WUQU KAWOQ SA: $20k → 9%WUQU KAWOQ SA: $15k → 9%WUQU KAWOQ SA: $10k → 9%WUQU KAWOQ SA: $7k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
ID
NY
MA
OR
IA
PA
CA
UT
MD
TN
HI
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of Swinmurn Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Swinmurn Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 35% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.3M · 10 repeat orgs$267k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
10

Total granted

$5.3M
$267k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+30%

Still filing today

90%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureMembership BenefitPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    Mercy Corps
    9× · 2017–2025 · $4.1M · revenue +19%
  • WK
    Wuqu Kawoq SA
    5× · 2017–2021 · $467k · revenue +324%
  • LITERARY ARTS INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $210k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • SN
    SEMILLA NUEVAgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $110k · revenue +738%
  • SS
    STREET SOCCER USA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +266%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue -47%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Health Poverty Action Usa

Health Poverty Action USA acts in solidarity with health workers, activists & communities worldwide to improve health & challenge the causes of poverty. We do this in 3 distinct ways: 1. We approach health as an issue of social justice. We…

International
2
Global Pediatric Alliance

Global Pediatric Alliance's mission is to promote grassroots empowerment and community-based healthcare to reduce maternal and infant mortality, and improve the lives of women and children in poor, rural areas in Latin America.

Arts & Culture
3
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

4
Maia

MAIA is creating a generation of empowered leaders who have the knowledge and resources they need to lead choice-filled lives, break cycles of poverty, and ignite transformational change in their communities.

International
5
Rainforest Alliance Holding Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

Environment
6
One Equal Heart Foundation

One Equal Heart works with local partner organizations based in Mexico strengthening their capacities to support Indigenous families and communities in rural Chiapas to drive their own development according to their vision of wellbeing and…

Philanthropy
7
Puente a la Salud Comunitaria

Puente promotes the cultivation and consumption of amaranth, combined with other traditional and strategic crops, to encourage the diversification of local agriculture and diet for rural communities in Mexico and improve community…

Food & Nutrition
8
Guatemala Family Development Inc

Gfd works to support and elevate the health, well-being, and education of indigenous mayan children and families in remote, rural guatemalan communities through philanthropy, aid, and in-person service. together, with fundenor, our ngo…

Health
9
The Humble Village

Serving Families in Guatemala living in extreme poverty with nutrition, education and self-reliance to help empower and lift them

International
10
The Global Hunger Project

The Hunger Project is working to create a world without hunger through women-centered, holistic development strategies that address the root causes of hunger and poverty. In 2024, it reached nearly 13 million people in over 10,000…

International
11
The Gardens Edge Inc

The Gardens Edge supports sustainable agriculture, micro-enterprise, and education in rural communities in order to revitalize cultural knowledge and improve economic well-being.

Education
12
Connectedconectando Educacion

To improve access, quality and relevance of education for youth in rural central america.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Aid and the most unlike its peers is SMALLCHANGE4BIGCHANGE. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
10/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Mercy Corps — $4,066,052 · InternationalMercy Corps+5 more — $283,000 · International+5 moreSTICHTING TESS UNLIMITED — $265,000 · OtherSTICHTING T…LITERARY ARTS INC — $210,000 · OtherLITERARY AR…AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS — $25,000 · OtherFriends of Vallarta Botanical Gardens AC — $25,000 · Other+5 more — $39,900 · Other+5 moreWuqu Kawoq SA — $466,500 · Human ServicesWuqu Kawoq…STREET SOCCER USA INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesSTREET SOC…MAYA MIDWIFERY INTERNATIONAL INC — $100,500 · HealthGOLDEN STATE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $90,000 · Recreation & SportsNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $40,000 · Civil RightsUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA — $25,000 · Philanthropy
International$4,349,052Other$564,900Human Services$516,500Health$100,500Recreation & Sports$90,000Civil Rights$40,000Philanthropy$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMercy Corps — $4,066,052 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetWuqu Kawoq SA — $466,500 over 5y, 8.9% of budgetLITERARY ARTS INC — $210,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetSEMILLA NUEVA — $110,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetCHILD AID — $109,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetMAYA MIDWIFERY INTERNATIONAL INC — $100,500 over 5y, 22% of budgetGOLDEN STATE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $90,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetSTREET SOCCER USA INC — $50,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFriends of Vallarta Botanical Gardens AC — $25,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetECOTRUST — $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALOHA HARVEST — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSMALLCHANGE4BIGCHANGE — $7,400 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetINTERAMERICAN HEALTH ALLIANCE — $7,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetRising Minds Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetALL TOGETHER FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Globalgiving Foundation IncDC13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Globalgiving Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Swinmurn Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 14%
  • Mercy Corps47% of income from government
  • Ecotrust14% of income from government
  • Literary Arts Inc10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Swinmurn Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Swinmurn Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph