Skip to content

· Private foundation

Swenson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$78k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$190kAnimals$70kEducation$55kHealth$53kRecreation & Sports$41kHuman Services$23kEnvironment$19kFood & Nutrition$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AACA MUSEUM INC$15,000
FRIENDS OF CAMP SECURITY$15,000
EASTERN MUSEUM OF MOTOR RACING$10,000
RAVENS RIDGE WILDLIFE CENTER$5,000
YORK COUNTY FOOD BANK$5,000
MARYLAND MUSTANG MISSION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
FARM AND NATURAL LANDS TRUST$4,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN$3,000
AT CHILDREN'S PROJECT$3,000
MICHAEL J FOX PARKINSON S FOUNDATION$3,000
LIFEPATH CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES$2,500
DANNY AND RONS RESCUE$1,500
CATHOLIC HARVEST FOOD PANTRY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WELLSPRING OF LIFE FARM: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
MD
AZ
SC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$426k · 16 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
10

Total granted

$426k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+6%

Still filing today

44%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthArts & CultureScience & TechRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PN
    PENNSYLVANIA NAT'L HORSE SHOW FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2021 · $31k · revenue ×43
  • AT
    Ataxia Telangiectasia Children's Project Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $27k · revenue +24%
  • DR
    DANNY & RONS RESCUE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $22k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • P
    PCADV
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +28%
  • TH
    THE HORN FARM CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…

Science & Tech
2
The Wildlife Society

The wildlife society's mission is to inspire, empower, and enable wildlife professionals to sustain wildlife populations and habitats through science-based management and conservation.

Animals
3
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
4
Conservation Farms & Ranches

Preserving and enhancing the habitat of wildlife, such as sandhill cranes, waterfowl, raptors, which habitat expenses are supported by agricultural activities.

Housing & Shelter
5
Maryland Zoological Society Inc

To engage people in the wonders of the living world through personal encounters with animals, fostering empathy and lifelong support for conservation of wildlife and wild places.

Animals
6
Dutchess Land Conservancy Inc

Dutchess land conservancy (dlc) is dedicated to preserving the scenic, agricultural and environmental resources of dutchess county, new york, and the surrounding area. dlc, as a private non-profit land conservation organization, carries…

Environment
7
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
8
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
9
American Kennel Club Canine Health Foundation

The mission of the akc canine health foundation, inc. is to fund, advance, and communicate canine health research and science through knowledge and discovery.

Animals
10
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
11
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
12
Wetlands America Trust Inc

Wetlands america trust, inc. is a nonprofit organization formed in 1985 to expand ducks unlimited, inc's mission to provide leadership in the protection of the natural balance of wetlands ecosystems ensuring the future viability of…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bob Woodruff Family Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Aaca Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PENN STATE UNIVERSITY: $52,000 · OtherPENN STATE UNIVERSITYFRIENDS OF CAMP SECURITY: $40,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF CAMP SECURITYEASTERN MUSEUM OF RACING: $35,000 · OtherEASTERN MUSEUM OF RACINGEASTERN MUSEUM OF MOTOR RACING: $20,000 · OtherEASTERN MUSEUM OF MOTOR RACINGMICHAEL J FOX PARKINSON S FOUNDATION: $18,000 · OtherMICHAEL J FOX PARKINSON S FOUNDATIONFARM AND NATURAL LANDS TRUST: $14,000 · OtherFARM AND NATURAL LANDS TRUSTMARYLAND MUSTANG MISSION INC: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherMJ FOX FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Other+11 more: $40,000 · Other+11 moreAACA MUSEUM INC: $95,000 · Arts & CultureAACA MUSEUM INCDANNY & RONS RESCUE: $21,500 · AnimalsDANNY & RONS RES…MARYLAND HORSE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · AnimalsMARYLAND HORSE F…CITY RANCH INC: $13,000 · AnimalsCITY RANCH INCRAVEN RIDGE WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $10,000 · AnimalsRAVEN RIDGE WILD…WEST SHORE WILDLIFE CENTER: $5,000 · AnimalsWEST SHORE WILDL…PENNSYLVANIA NAT'L HORSE SHOW FOUNDATION: $30,750 · Recreation & SportsAtaxia Telangiectasia Children's Project Inc: $27,000 · Science & TechTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthBOB WOODRUFF FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · HealthNatural Lands Trust Inc: $5,000 · Environment
Other$249,000Arts & Culture$95,000Animals$69,500Recreation & Sports$30,750Science & Tech$27,000Health$10,000Environment$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAACA MUSEUM INC: $95,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA NAT'L HORSE SHOW FOUNDATION: $30,750 over 3y, 10% of budgetAtaxia Telangiectasia Children's Project Inc: $27,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetDANNY & RONS RESCUE: $21,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMARYLAND HORSE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetCITY RANCH INC: $13,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetRAVEN RIDGE WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $10,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST SHORE WILDLIFE CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBOB WOODRUFF FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNatural Lands Trust Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWELLSPRING OF LIFE FARM INC: $3,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetYORK UNION RESCUE MISSION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AACA MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA NAT'L HORSE SHOW FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Ataxia Telangiectasia Children's Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds DANNY & RONS RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds MARYLAND HORSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds RAVEN RIDGE WILDLIFE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds YORK COUNTY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WEST SHORE WILDLIFE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BOB WOODRUFF FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DIG DEEP ↗
  • Who funds Natural Lands Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds WELLSPRING OF LIFE FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds YORK UNION RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kinsley FoundationPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kinsley Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Swenson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Swenson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Swenson Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph