Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sweet Bay Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$78kReligion$75kArts & Culture$41kHealth$15kInternational$14kPublic Benefit$11kAnimals$10kYouth Development$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$622k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JSERRA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
ST CHARLES BORROMEO CATHOLIC CHURCH$4,125
LOYOLA HIGH SCHOOL$4,000
SAGE SCHOOL$3,500
ST JOHN NEUMANN CHURCH$2,500
PUPS WITHOUT BORDERS$2,500
HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION$2,500
BEST BUDDIES INTERNATIONAL$2,500
ST THERESE OF CARMEL CATHOLIC CHURC$2,125
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA$750
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
PA
CA
MO
VA
AZ
DC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$220k · 33 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
25

Total granted

$220k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+9%

Still filing today

45%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureInternationalCivil RightsHealthAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JUDICIAL WATCH INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $11k · revenue +141%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $10k · revenue +3%
  • JUNIPERO SERRA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL
    2× · 2024–2025 · $9k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $9k
  • OL
    OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
  • OS
    OUR SAVIOR PARISH & USC CARUSO CATHOLIC
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
Scripps College

To educate women to develop their intellect and talents through active participation in a community of scholars, so that as graduates they may contribute to society through public and private lives of leadership, service, integrity and…

Education
3
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
4
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
5
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
6
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
7
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
8
San Diego Christian College

San Diego Christian College exists to educate and inspire students through the truth of scripture and the development of competencies that prepare graduates whose purpose is to impact the world.

Education
9
Claremont Graduate University

Claremont Graduate University prepares individuals to be leaders for positive change in the world. Unique in its transdisciplinary approach, the University is dedicated to the creation, dissemination, and application of new knowledge and…

Education
10
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
11
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
12
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Judicial Watch Inc; the most unlike its peers is Global Glow. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LAURYN JANA FOUNDATION: $24,570 · OtherLAURYN JANA FOUNDATIONLOYOLA HIGH SCHOOL: $22,750 · OtherLOYOLA HIGH SCHOOLST JOHN NEUMANN CHURCH: $16,000 · OtherST JOHN NEUMANN CHURCHST CHARLES BORROMEO CATHOLIC CHURCH: $13,625 · OtherST CHARLES BORROMEO CATHOLIC CHURCHUNIVERSITY OF SO CALIFORNIA: $12,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SO CALIFORNIAST THERESE OF CARMEL CATHOLIC CHURC: $9,625 · OtherNATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS: $9,375 · OtherST JOHN NEUMANN CATHOLIC CHURCH: $9,070 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $9,000 · Other+36 more: $69,140 · Other+36 moreJUNIPERO SERRA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $9,000 · Arts & CultureShafranski Art Foundation: $5,250 · Arts & CultureMEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $3,000 · Arts & CultureUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · EducationThe Charlemagne Institute: $1,500 · EducationJohn Paul The Great Catholic University: $500 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MCINTIRE SCHOOL OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION: $500 · EducationLoloma Foundation: $7,000 · InternationalBest Buddies International Inc: $6,750 · InternationalJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $11,000 · Public BenefitPUPS WITHOUT BORDERS: $8,250 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals Inc: $2,125 · AnimalsINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $3,570 · Civil RightsOBRIA MEDICAL CLINICS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $1,000 · Civil Rights
Other$195,155Arts & Culture$17,250Education$14,500International$13,750Public Benefit$11,000Animals$10,375Civil Rights$4,570

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIPERO SERRA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPUPS WITHOUT BORDERS: $8,250 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetLoloma Foundation: $7,000 over 7y, 4.2% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $6,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT VERITAS: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $3,570 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $2,125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCUREBOUND: $1,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Charlemagne Institute: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOBRIA MEDICAL CLINICS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSan Diego Master Chorale: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSt Francis Xavier Lay Missionary Societ: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJohn Paul The Great Catholic University: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MCINTIRE SCHOOL OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JUNIPERO SERRA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds PUPS WITHOUT BORDERS ↗
  • Who funds Loloma Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Best Buddies International Inc ↗
  • Who funds Shafranski Art Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT VERITAS ↗
  • Who funds Global GLOW ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CUREBOUND ↗
  • Who funds The Charlemagne Institute ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA14.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sweet Bay Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sweet Bay Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sweet Bay Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Sweet Bay Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sweet Bay’s filings →

More from the funding graph