Skip to content

· Private foundation

Suzanne Sloat & Ray Okonski Fdn

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38k
Granted FY2026still arriving
24
Grants FY2026still arriving
5
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$34kEducation$13kHealth$12kRecreation & Sports$8kCivil Rights$6kHuman Services$3kReligion$2kEnvironment$2kOther$0
02FY2026 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$650k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$5,000
POLISH CENTURY HERITAGE FOUNDATION$5,000
NATIONAL POLISH AMERICAN SPORTS$4,000
ST EDITH CATHOLIC SCHOOL$4,000
CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN$3,250
POLISH CENTURY HERITAGE FOUNDATION$3,000
AMERICAN POLISH CULTURAL SOCIETY$2,000
CAPUCHIN SOUP KITCHEN$1,000
CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION$1,000
ANGEL HORSES$1,000
FRIENDS OF POLISH ART$1,000
POLISH AMERICAN CONGRESS$1,000
DEMENTIA SOCIETY OF AMERICA$1,000
THUNDER CHICKENS ROBOTIC CLUB$1,000
DIOCESE OF SAGINAW$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 43% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%DEMENTIA SOCIETY OF AMERICA: $1k → 6%PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK: $500 → 14%ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $500 → 17%40 DAYS FOR LIFE: $500 → 22%HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%FRIENDS OF POLISH ART: $1k → 8%LITTLE TRAVERSE CONSERVANCEY: $1k → 9%WAGBO FARM & EDUCATION CENTER: $1k → 9%POLISH CENTURY HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $5k → 14%POLISH AMERICAN CONGRESS: $1k → 21%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH: $1k → 17%WGTE PUBLIC MEDIA: $5k → 18%AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR POLISH CULTURE: $1k → 7%FRIENDS OF POLISH ART: $1k → 8%LITTLE TRAVERSE CONSERVANCEY: $1k → 9%POLISH CENTURY HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%POLISH AMERICAN CONGRESS: $1k → 21%AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR POLISH CULTURE: $1k → 7%POLISH CENTURY HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%POLISH AMERICAN CONGRESS: $1k → 21%THUNDER CHICKENS ROBOTIC CLUB: $1k → 8%POLISH CENTURY HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%POLISH AMERICAN CONGRESS: $1k → 21%POLISH CENTURY HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%POLISH CENTURY HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%POLISH AMERICAN CONGRESS: $1k → 21%POLISH CENTURY CLUB OF DETROIT INC: $5k → 8%POLISH CENTURY HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%POLISH AMERICAN CONGRESS: $1k → 21%AMERICAN POLISH CULTURAL SOCIETY: $3k → 8%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIG: $5k → 21%AMERICAN POLISH CULTURAL SOCIETY: $2k → 8%MADONNA UNIVERSITY: $1k → 21%AMERICAN POLISH CULTURAL SOCIETY: $2k → 8%LENNON CENTER: $2k → 21%NATIONAL POLISH AMERICAN SPORTS: $5k → 8%LENNON CENTER: $1k → 21%NATIONAL POLISH AMERICAN SPORTS: $4k → 8%NATIONAL POLISH AMERICAN SPORTS: $3k → 8%CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN: $3k → 8%METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF DETROIT: $2k → 21%CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN: $1k → 8%CAPUCHIN SOUP KITCHEN: $1k → 21%ST EDITH CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $4k → 21%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $5k → 21%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $5k → 21%CHURCH OF THE DIVINE CHILD: $2k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
OH
PA
CA
CO
VA
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 44% of Suzanne Sloat & Ray Okonski Fdn’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 79% of the giving stays in MI; by stated purpose, 50%.

Suzanne Sloat & Ray Okonski Fdnlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$85k · 12 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2026, 3 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
17

Total granted

$85k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+11%

Still filing today

58%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25’26
EducationHealthArts & CultureAnimalsEnvironmentPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    POLISH CENTURY HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2023–2026 · $26k
  • UO
    University of Michigan
    3× · 2023–2026 · $15k · revenue +88%
  • NP
    NATIONAL POLISH AMERICAN SPORTS HAL
    3× · 2023–2026 · $12k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • WP
    WGTE PUBLIC MEDIA
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • DC
    DIVINE CHILD PARISH DEARBORN
    one grant, 2025 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
2
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
3
Polish American Chamber of Commerce

The polish american chamber of commerce is dedicated to fostering its members' business interests, educating and building relations.

Community Improvement
4
Association of Catholic Colleges and University

The association of catholic colleges and universities, founded in 1899, serves as the collective voice of u.s catholic higher education. through programs and services, the association strengthens and promptes the catholic identity and…

—
5
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
6
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
7
Marietta College

Marietta college (mc) provides a strong foundation for a lifetime of leadership, critical thinking, and problem solving. we achieve this mission by offering undergraduates a contemporary liberal arts education and graduate students an…

Education
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
Marian University Inc

Marian university is a catholic applied liberal arts community that welcomes diverse spiritual traditions sponsored by the congregation of sisters of st agnes. marian university engages students in the education of the whole person. we…

Education
10
American Health Law Association

The mission of the american health law association is to deliver authoritative educational content and serve as a professional home for all who engage with health law.

—
11
Hilbert College

Hilbert college is an independent institution of higher learning that embraces its catholic franciscan heritage and values. students from diverse backgrounds are educated in liberal arts and professional programs to become informed…

Education
12
Presidents Council State Universities of Michigan

The primary mission of the presidents council is to advocate higher education as a public good and to promote its collective value in serving the public interest and the state of michigan. the primary goal is to provide services to members…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Humane Society of Saginaw County Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
9/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

POLISH CENTURY HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $26,000 · OtherPOLISH CENTURY HERITAGE FOUNDATIONUniversity of Michigan: $15,000 · OtherUniversity of MichiganPolish American Congress Inc-MI Div: $6,000 · OtherPolish American Congress Inc-MI DivPOLISH CENTURY CLUB OF DETROIT INC: $5,500 · OtherPOLISH CENTURY CLUB OF DETROIT INCWGTE PUBLIC MEDIA: $5,000 · OtherWGTE PUBLIC MEDIAREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $5,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANST EDITH CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $4,000 · Other+21 more: $17,100 · Other+21 moreNATIONAL POLISH AMERICAN SPORTS HAL: $12,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL POLI…American Council for Polish Culture: $2,000 · Arts & CultureAmerican Coun…MODEL-T AUTOMOTIVE HERITAGE COMPLEX INC: $500 · Arts & CultureAmerican Polish Cultural Society: $7,950 · EducationAmerican …Madonna University: $1,000 · EducationMadonna U…40 DAYS FOR LIFE: $500 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $500 · Education+1 more: $250 · EducationTHE LENNON CENTER: $3,000 · HealthDEMENTIA SOCIETY INC: $1,000 · HealthPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $500 · HealthCATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN: $4,750 · ReligionLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc: $2,500 · EnvironmentTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Public Benefit
Other$83,600Arts & Culture$14,500Education$10,200Health$5,000Religion$4,750Environment$2,500Public Benefit$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Michigan: $15,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetNATIONAL POLISH AMERICAN SPORTS HAL: $12,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetAmerican Polish Cultural Society: $7,950 over 5y, 6.0% of budgetPolish American Congress Inc-MI Div: $6,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetCATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN: $4,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LENNON CENTER: $3,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMadonna University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget40 DAYS FOR LIFE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMODEL-T AUTOMOTIVE HERITAGE COMPLEX INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SAGINAW COUNTY INCORPORATED: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL POLISH AMERICAN SPORTS HAL ↗
  • Who funds American Polish Cultural Society ↗
  • Who funds Polish American Congress Inc-MI Div ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds THE LENNON CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Little Traverse Conservancy Inc ↗
  • Who funds American Council for Polish Culture ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ANGEL HORSES INC ↗
  • Who funds Madonna University ↗
  • Who funds DEMENTIA SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds 40 DAYS FOR LIFE ↗
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds MODEL-T AUTOMOTIVE HERITAGE COMPLEX INC ↗
  • Who funds CATH LEAGUE FOR RELIGIOUS & CIVIL RIGHTS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA6.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Suzanne Sloat & Ray Okonski Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Suzanne Sloat & Ray Okonski Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Suzanne Sloat & Ray Okonski Fdn?

    Find your warmest path to Suzanne Sloat & Ray Okonski Fdn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Suzanne Sloat & Ray Okonski Fdn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph