Skip to content

Michigan · Private foundation

Suzanne Sloat & Ray Okonski Fdn

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38k
Granted FY2026(still arriving)
24
Grants FY2026
17
Organizations funded FY2025
53%
First-time grantees FY2025
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2026
$1,000
Largest grant, FY2026
$5,000
Organizations funded a year
3 to 17
FY2022 to FY2025
States reached, FY2026
5
Total assets, FY2026
$650k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2025, 53% of the organizations Suzanne Sloat & Ray Okonski Fdn funded were first-time grantees, receiving 23% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEducationEnvironmentPublic BenefitCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2026still arriving21$34k57%
FY202517$29k53%
FY202415$29k67%
FY202310$25k70%
FY20223$2kn/a
98% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$34kEducation$13kHealth$12kRecreation & Sports$8kCivil Rights$6kHuman Services$3kReligion$2kEnvironment$2kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
OH
PA
CA
CO
VA
TN
DC
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2022 to FY2026, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Polish Century Heritage Foundation$26,0004n/a
University of Michigan$15,00031%
National Polish American Sports Hal$12,000312%
American Polish Cultural Society$7,95056%
Polish American Congress Inc-MI Div$6,00051%
Regents of the University of Michigan$5,0001n/a
The Lennon Center$3,00030%
Friends of Polish Art$2,5003n/a
Little Traverse Conservancy Inc$2,50030%
American Council for Polish Culture$2,0002n/a
Show all 23 grantees
All grantees of Suzanne Sloat & Ray Okonski Fdn by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Polish Century Heritage Foundation$26,0004n/a
University of Michigan$15,00031%
National Polish American Sports Hal$12,000312%
American Polish Cultural Society$7,95056%
Polish American Congress Inc-MI Div$6,00051%
Regents of the University of Michigan$5,0001n/a
The Lennon Center$3,00030%
Friends of Polish Art$2,5003n/a
Little Traverse Conservancy Inc$2,50030%
American Council for Polish Culture$2,0002n/a
The Heritage Foundation$2,00020%
Divine Child Parish Dearborn$1,5001n/a
Angel Horses Inc$1,0001n/a
Madonna University$1,00010%
Dementia Society Inc$1,0001n/a
40 Days for Life$50010%
Pancreatic Cancer Action Network Inc$50010%
Fellowship of Catholic University Students$5001n/a
Alzheimer's Foundation of America Inc$5001n/a
Model-T Automotive Heritage Complex Inc$50010%
Cath League for Religious & Civil Rights$5001n/a
Delta College Foundation$2501n/a
Humane Society of Saginaw County Incorporated$10010%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 18 recipients with no EIN on record ($26k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Suzanne Sloat & Ray Okonski Fdn supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Michigan: $15,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetNational Polish American Sports Hal: $12,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetAmerican Polish Cultural Society: $7,950 over 5y, 6.0% of budgetPolish American Congress Inc-MI Div: $6,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetThe Lennon Center: $3,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Heritage Foundation: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMadonna University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget40 Days for Life: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPancreatic Cancer Action Network Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetModel-T Automotive Heritage Complex Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Society of Saginaw County Incorporated: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 12.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA6.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Suzanne Sloat & Ray Okonski Fdn with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Suzanne Sloat & Ray Okonski Fdn?

Find your warmest path to Suzanne Sloat & Ray Okonski Fdn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Suzanne Sloat & Ray Okonski Fdn

How much does Suzanne Sloat & Ray Okonski Fdn give?
Suzanne Sloat & Ray Okonski Fdn reported 24 grants totaling $37,500 in its FY2026 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 17 organizations a year over FY2022 to FY2025.
What does Suzanne Sloat & Ray Okonski Fdn fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2026, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (41%), Education (15%), Health (14%).
Who are Suzanne Sloat & Ray Okonski Fdn's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2022 to FY2026: Polish Century Heritage Foundation ($26k), University of Michigan ($15k), National Polish American Sports Hal ($12k).
Does Suzanne Sloat & Ray Okonski Fdn fund new organizations?
In FY2025, 53% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Suzanne Sloat & Ray Okonski Fdn accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Suzanne Sloat & Ray Okonski Fdn?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include National Philanthropic Trust, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.
Where is Suzanne Sloat & Ray Okonski Fdn based?
Suzanne Sloat & Ray Okonski Fdn is based in MI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Suzanne Sloat & Ray Okonski Fdn’s filings →

More from the funding graph