Skip to content

· Public charity

Sutter Yuba Homeless Consortium

To help for the basic needs of the homeless and precariously housed in yuba sutter counties, including, but not limited to, feeding and providing shelter for the homeless.

$1.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$405k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$11MFood & Nutrition$1.2MHealth$691kHuman Services$30k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $1,710,863, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,939,467 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $228,604 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $611k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.1M
$132,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Sutter County HHS$404,739
Habitat for Humanity$350,000
The Salvation Army$315,000
Hands of Hope$151,936
Harmony Health$132,500
Peachtree Health$132,500
Sutter County Superintendent$121,476
Yuba County Office of Educati$72,712
Regional Emerg Shelter Team$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Thurmond Project Development: $141k → 12%Yuba County: $299k → 15%Harmony Health: $238k → 15%Michael Prothero MFT & Assoc: $18k → 14%Harmony Health: $133k → 15%Yuba County Office of Educati: $104k → 15%Yuba County Office of Educati: $73k → 15%Yuba County: $30k → 15%Sutter County Superintendent: $121k → 14%Sutter County Superintendent: $104k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 15 repeat orgs$125k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
3

Total granted

$13M
$125k

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    Habitat for Humanity Intl Yuba Sutter
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +261%
  • HO
    Hands of Hope Resources for Homeless Families
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +262% · 70% of their budget
  • RM
    Rideout Memorial Hospital
    5× · 2020–2024 · $660k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • YC
    Yuba County HHS
    one grant, 2022 · $102k
  • GU
    Grants Under 5000
    one grant, 2021 · $16k
  • CV
    CENTRAL VALLEY HOMELESS VETERANS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Adventist Health Tulare

Living Gods love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

—
2
Hurtt Family Health Clinic Inc

Hurtt Family Health Clinic provides highly accessible, preventative, primary and specialized healthcare to homeless and underserved families through a full service medical, dental, vision, mental health, chiropractic, optometry and health…

Health
3
Foothill House of Hospitality Dba Hospitality House

The mission of Hospitality House is tobring homeless people in Nevada County into a circle of community caring thatoffers shelter, sustenance, medical care, advocacy, opportunity, dignity, and hopeas we assist them in transitioning from…

Housing & Shelter
4
Consejo Counseling & Referral Service

Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.

Health
5
Homeless Resource Council of the Sierras

To lead, collaborate, coordinate, develop, and implement strategies and resources to end homelessness in Nevada and Placer counties.

—
6
Northern Nevada Hiv Outpatient Program Education and Services

Northern Nevada Hopes provides affordable, high-quality, medical, behavioral health, and support services for all. We are dedicated to building a healthier community by providing coordinated care and support for individuals and family…

Health
7
Sutter Valley Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
8
House of Hope

Assisting and housing females in recovery

—
9
City of Refuge Sacramento

City of Refuge Sacramento, a community-based organization, exists to support people living in marginalized communities of Sacramento and to empower their ability to create a personal transformation that will lead to a healthy and thriving…

Human Services
10
Redwoods Rural Health Center Inc

Redwoods Rural Health Center is a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) that provides primary, preventative healthcare services to all people without regard to social or economic status.

Health
11
Bay Area Community Services Inc

BACS' mission is to uplift under-served individuals and their families by doing "whatever it takes." BACS helps people experiencing homelessness, housing insecurity, or behavioural health challenges while balancing other complications like…

—
12
Sonora Community Hospital dba Adventist Health Sonora

Living Gods love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sutter Yuba Homeless Consortium; the most unlike its peers is Bridges to Housing Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY: $4,334,792 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYSutter County HHS: $1,191,028 · OtherSutter County HHSRegional Housing Authority: $1,152,000 · OtherRegional Housing Authority+5 more: $281,122 · OtherHabitat for Humanity Intl Yuba Sutter: $1,515,775 · Housing & ShelterHabitat for Humanity Intl Y…Hands of Hope Resources for Homeless Families: $1,317,806 · Housing & ShelterHands of Hope Resources for…BRIDGES TO HOUSING INC: $322,981 · Housing & ShelterBRIDGES TO HOUSING INCSutter Yuba Homeless Consortium: $890,240 · Human ServicesSutter Yuba Hom…Harmony Health Medical Clinic and Family Resource Center: $370,500 · Human ServicesHarmony Health …Casa de Esperanza: $343,527 · Human ServicesCasa de Esperan…REGIONAL EMERGENCY SHELTER TEAM: $186,660 · Human ServicesREGIONAL EMERGE…Rideout Memorial Hospital: $660,190 · HealthPEACH TREE HEALTHCARE: $290,830 · HealthAMPLA HEALTH: $45,000 · Health
Other$6,958,942Housing & Shelter$3,156,562Human Services$1,790,927Health$996,020

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHabitat for Humanity Intl Yuba Sutter: $1,515,775 over 6y, 9.6% of budgetHands of Hope Resources for Homeless Families: $1,317,806 over 6y, 70% of budgetSutter Yuba Homeless Consortium: $890,240 over 3y, 27% of budgetRideout Memorial Hospital: $660,190 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHarmony Health Medical Clinic and Family Resource Center: $370,500 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetCasa de Esperanza: $343,527 over 5y, 6.7% of budgetBRIDGES TO HOUSING INC: $322,981 over 5y, 57% of budgetPEACH TREE HEALTHCARE: $290,830 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetREGIONAL EMERGENCY SHELTER TEAM: $186,660 over 6y, 45% of budgetAMPLA HEALTH: $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity Intl Yuba Sutter ↗
  • Who funds Hands of Hope Resources for Homeless Families ↗
  • Who funds Sutter Yuba Homeless Consortium ↗
  • Who funds Rideout Memorial Hospital ↗
  • Who funds Harmony Health Medical Clinic and Family Resource Center ↗
  • Who funds Casa de Esperanza ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGES TO HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds PEACH TREE HEALTHCARE ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL EMERGENCY SHELTER TEAM ↗
  • Who funds AMPLA HEALTH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sutter County Community Action AgencyCA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sutter County Community Action Agency · Sutter Valley Hospitals · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sutter Yuba Homeless Consortium funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sutter Yuba Homeless Consortium. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sutter Yuba Homeless Consortium?

    Find your warmest path to Sutter Yuba Homeless Consortium through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sutter Yuba Homeless Consortium’s filings →

    More from the funding graph