Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Susskind Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$57k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$145kHealth$67kPhilanthropy$66kEducation$43kHuman Services$30kInternational$24kCivil Rights$10kArts & Culture$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
$522
Median grant
6
States reached
$255k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SINAI TEMPLE$14,005
WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE$10,000
JEWISH INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECUR$7,500
JEWISH FEDERATION OF LA$6,000
WOMEN'S GUILD CEDER-SINAI$3,400
STAND WITH US$2,591
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$2,000
VISTA DEL MAR$2,000
PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK$1,500
CITY OF HOPE$1,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$1,500
THE PEOPLE CONCERN$540
UNION RESCUE MISSION$522
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$515
CAMP RAMAH IN THE POCONOS$515
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%VISTA DEL MAR: $11k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $3k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $2k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $2k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $2k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $2k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $1k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $1k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $522 → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $521 → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $519 → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $500 → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $519 → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $540 → 14%EXCEPTIONAL CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $600 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELE: $50 → 14%LANGE FOUNDATION: $511 → 14%LANGE FOUNDATION: $511 → 14%LANGE FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%LANGE FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%LANGE FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%LANGE FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%LANGE FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%LANGE FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
DC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 37% of Susskind Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 71% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 44% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Susskind Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.9% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$350k · 33 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
49

Total granted

$350k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+36%

Still filing today

55%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthInternationalRecreation & SportsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Michigan
    4× · 2017–2023 · $27k · revenue +202%
  • VD
    VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +19%
  • IE
    ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $10k · revenue +91%

Funded once

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +27%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • LA
    LA ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2017 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
2
Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…

Philanthropy
3
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

5
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

6
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

7
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

8
Los Angeles World Affairs Council and Town Hall

The organization is a non-partisan, membership based speakers' forum that connects business leaders, community members, and engaged individuals with shared interest in local, national, and global affairs. it provides an open and accessible…

International
9
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
10
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Simon Wiesenthal Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Inclusion Matters by Shanes Inspiration. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community FederationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionLand Conservation Organizat…Homeless Services & ShelterFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Public University Foundatio…Government Accountability R…Cancer Support OrganizationsDevelopmental Disabilities …Community Arts Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%2%<5yr15%2%5–10yr20%2%10–20yr17%26%20–35yr11%26%35–55yr13%42%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%1%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr17%24%20–35yr11%22%35–55yr13%54%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/45
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,933

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/43
Grantees still filing
31/43
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SINAI TEMPLE — $111,344 · OtherSINAI TEMPLEJEWISH FEDERATION OF LA — $57,590 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF LAIndividual grant recipient — $30,380 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUniversity of Michigan — $27,250 · OtherUniversity of MichiganREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $12,500 · Other+59 more — $78,162 · Other+59 moreTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $40,000 · EducationTRUSTEES O…University of San Francisco — $2,000 · Education+2 more — $290 · EducationVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES — $24,228 · Human ServicesVISTA DEL …American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $10,000 · Human ServicesAmerican N…LANGE FOUNDATION — $4,022 · Human ServicesLANGE FOUN…UNION RESCUE MISSION — $2,081 · Human Services+3 more — $1,190 · Human ServicesISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE — $10,441 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $10,281 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $1,500 · International+2 more — $402 · InternationalTOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $7,898 · HealthPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC — $5,015 · HealthLEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $500 · Health+2 more — $175 · HealthAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC — $1,800 · Arts & CultureCRAFT CONTEMPORARY — $1,650 · Arts & CultureTHE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES — $1,375 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM ASSOCIATES — $500 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $180 · Arts & CultureCAMP RAMAH IN THE POCONOS — $3,575 · Recreation & SportsInclusion Matters by Shanes Inspiration — $670 · Recreation & SportsTHE SCGA FOUNDATION — $322 · Recreation & Sports
Other$317,226Education$42,290Human Services$41,521International$22,624Health$13,588Arts & Culture$5,505Recreation & Sports$4,567

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $40,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan — $27,250 over 4y, 12% of budgetVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES — $24,228 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE — $10,441 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $10,281 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $7,898 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC — $5,015 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLANGE FOUNDATION — $4,022 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN THE POCONOS — $3,575 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $2,750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $2,576 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION — $2,081 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of San Francisco — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC — $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRAFT CONTEMPORARY — $1,650 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES MISSION INC — $1,550 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES — $1,375 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONCERN FOUNDATION — $1,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN INSPIRING NEXTGEN — $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL FOUNDATION INC — $790 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInclusion Matters by Shanes Inspiration — $670 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN — $540 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SCGA FOUNDATION — $322 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $252 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONELEGACY FOUNDATION — $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY — $90 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $80 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEADQUARTERS — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds University of Michigan
  • Who funds VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES
  • Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds TOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC
  • Who funds LANGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CAMP RAMAH IN THE POCONOS
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
  • Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION
  • Who funds University of San Francisco
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC
  • Who funds CRAFT CONTEMPORARY
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES MISSION INC
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC
  • Who funds THE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES
  • Who funds CONCERN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WOMEN INSPIRING NEXTGEN
  • Who funds JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY11.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Susskind Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 94 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph