Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Susan & Edgardo Abello Char Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$172k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$220kEducation$198kReligion$143kInternational$74kArts & Culture$59kHuman Services$31kYouth Development$18kEnvironment$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $125k
$5,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$488k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE DRAVET SYNDROME FOUNDATION$25,000
ST ANDREW CATHOLIC CHURCH$20,000
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$15,000
BARSTOW REED SOCIETY CLEVELAND CLINIC$15,000
CAF AMERICA (CHARITIES AID FDN AMERICA)$10,000
PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$10,000
HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF MARTIN COUNTY$10,000
TURNING POINT USA$10,000
ST THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE$10,000
LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF MARTIN COUNTY$5,000
KIWANIS CLUB OF STUART FLORIDA$5,000
Samaritans Purse$5,000
TREASURE COAST HOSPICE$5,000
KANE CTR COUNCIL ON AGING MARTIN COUNTY$5,000
SOMERSVILLE CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Pre-Born: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
AZ
NC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$569k · 23 repeat orgs$146k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
12

Total granted

$569k
$121k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+5%

Still filing today

43%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyAnimalsReligionCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BP
    Bay Path University
    7× · 2017–2023 · $48k · revenue +50%
  • DS
    DRAVET SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $35k · revenue +13%
  • PU
    PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $25k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • JM
    JOHNSON & MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • SH
    SPRINGFIELD HS OF SCIENCE& TECHNOLOGY
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • MM
    MARTIN MEMORIAL HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
2
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

3
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc

Embry-riddle is the world leader in aviation and aerospace higher education. its mission is to teach the science, practice and business of aviation and aerospace, preparing students for productive careers and leadership roles in business,…

Education
4
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
5
Baylor University

The mission of baylor university is to educate men and women for worldwide leadership and service by integrating academic excellence and christian commitment within a caring community.

Education
6
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.

Education
7
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
8
The Everglades Foundation Inc

The mission of the foundation is to restore and protect america's everglades through its three programmatic pillars: science, advocacy and education. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
9
University of South Florida Foundation Inc

University of South Florida Foundation, Inc.'s mission is to provide charitable and educational aid to the University of South Florida; to promote education and other related activities of the University; and to encourage research,…

Education
10
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
11
Florida Southern College

Florida southern college (florida southern or the college) is committed to educational excellence and is a selective comprehensive, private, united methodist affiliated college with a strong liberal arts core and signature programs. (see…

Education
12
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Turning Point Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Lake Bluff Park District Nfp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support OrganizationsCommunity Arts OrganizationsLand Conservation Organizat…Pregnancy Support ServicesPublic Library SupportAnimal Rescue and AdoptionFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community FoundationsHomeless Services & ShelterChristian Missionary Organi…Community Health Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%43%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%30%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr13%3%35–55yr16%49%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,540

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/24
Grantees still filing
17/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SOMERSVILLE CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH — $57,600 · OtherSOMERSVILLE CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHJOHNSON & MEMORIAL HOSPITAL — $50,000 · OtherJOHNSON & MEMORIAL HOSPITALCAF AMERICA (CHARITIES AID FDN AMERICA) — $45,000 · OtherCAF AMERICA (CHARITIES AID FDN AMERICA)BARSTOW REED SOCIETY CLEVELAND CLINIC — $45,000 · OtherBARSTOW REED SOCIETY CLEVELAND CLINICHISTORICAL SOCIETY OF MARTIN COUNTY INC — $33,000 · OtherHISTORICAL SOCIETY OF MARTIN COUNTY INCTREASURE COAST HOSPICE — $30,000 · OtherTREASURE COAST HOSPICEFAITH IN THE SPIRIT WITH NORTHFIELD — $30,000 · OtherFAITH IN THE SPIRIT WITH NORTHFIELDST ANDREW CATHOLIC CHURCH — $30,000 · OtherST ANDREW CATHOLIC CHURCHSPRINGFIELD LIBRARY & MUSEUMS — $25,750 · OtherSPRINGFIELD HS OF SCIENCE& TECHNOLOGY — $20,000 · OtherST THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE — $20,000 · Other+18 more — $117,000 · Other+18 moreHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $65,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGEBay Path University — $47,500 · EducationBay Path UniversityPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 · EducationPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUN…Library Foundation of Martin County — $20,000 · EducationLibrary Foundation of …DRAVET SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 · PhilanthropyCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $19,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS — $4,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 · Philanthropy+1 more — $1,000 · PhilanthropyMartin Memorial Foundation Inc — $35,000 · HealthGREEN PASTURES STUDY CENTER INC — $15,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $5,000 · ReligionFLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY INC — $16,000 · Science & TechPROJECT LIFT INC — $12,500 · Youth Development
Other$503,350Education$157,500Philanthropy$61,500Health$35,000Religion$20,000Science & Tech$16,000Youth Development$12,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $65,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBay Path University — $47,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDRAVET SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHISTORICAL SOCIETY OF MARTIN COUNTY INC — $33,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLibrary Foundation of Martin County — $20,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $19,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY INC — $16,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGREEN PASTURES STUDY CENTER INC — $15,000 over 3y, 9.7% of budgetPROJECT LIFT INC — $12,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJohnson Memorial Medical Center Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPRINGFIELD RESCUE MISSION — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT HOOD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOGS AND CATS FOREVER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE
  • Who funds Bay Path University
  • Who funds DRAVET SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Martin Memorial Foundation Inc
  • Who funds HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF MARTIN COUNTY INC
  • Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Library Foundation of Martin County
  • Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA
  • Who funds FLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds GREEN PASTURES STUDY CENTER INC
  • Who funds PROJECT LIFT INC
  • Who funds Johnson Memorial Medical Center Inc
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC
  • Who funds SPRINGFIELD RESCUE MISSION
  • Who funds Mission Pre-Born Inc
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds Mercury One Inc
  • Who funds PROJECT HOOD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF LAKE BLUFF PARK DISTRICT NFP
  • Who funds BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC
  • Who funds THE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA9.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Susan & Edgardo Abello Char Tr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Bay Path University3% of income from government
  • Dogs and Cats Forever1% of income from government
  • Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc0% of income from government
  • Florida Oceanographic Society Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Susan & Edgardo Abello Char Tr?

Find your warmest path to Susan & Edgardo Abello Char Tr through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph