· Private foundation
Susan a & Donald P Babson Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k68 grants · $205k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $84k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BAGLY INC (BOSTON ALLIANCE OF GAY LESBIAN BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENDER YOUTH | $14,250 |
| HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH | $10,000 |
| POINT FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| MEENAKSHI FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL BUDDHIST CENTER IN WHEATON MARYLAND | $10,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA - SERPENTINE SOCIETY | $10,000 |
| PATHWAY TO POSSIBLE | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN FUND FOR EMMANUEL | $8,000 |
| OUTRIGHT ACTION INTERNATIONAL | $8,000 |
| THE WASHINGTON BUDDHIST VIHARA | $7,800 |
| Individual grant recipient | $7,500 |
| NIPPONZAN MYOHOJI NEW ENGLAND PEACE PAGODA | $7,000 |
| BOSTON PREPARATORY CHARTER PUBLIC SCHOOL | $6,000 |
| HARLEM EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES FUND | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $126k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 49% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against -24% for the ones you funded once.
85 repeat relationships — 51 still active in FY2024, 34 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HRHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC4× · 2020–2024 · $41k · revenue +21%
- PFPOINT FOUNDATION4× · 2020–2024 · $40k · revenue +108%
- PTPATHWAY TO POSSIBLE INC4× · 2020–2024 · $40k · revenue +68%
Funded once
- IBINTERNATIONAL BUDDHIST CENTERone grant, 2023 · $15k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA ALUMNI ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -55%
SHARE OUR STRENGTHone grant, 2020 · $9k · revenue -44%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
Aclu foundation of ma was established to defend freedoms guaranteed in the constitution and bill of rights through public education and litigation.
Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The institute for nonprofit practice's mission is to transform communities by equipping the most promising nonprofit leaders with the skills, confidence, and resources they need to make their organizations effective, innovative, and…
The center for international policy is a woman-led, progressive, independent nonprofit center for research, education, and advocacy working to advance a more peaceful, just, and sustainable u.s. approach to foreign policy. through…
Building bridges across diverse sectors, and developing innovative technologies and tools for policy makers. a leader in the conflict assessment and early warning field, the fund for peace focuses on the problems of weak and failing…
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
The gnwp is a coalition of more than 100 womens rights groups and other civil society organizations continued on schedule o
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Defense Fund and the most unlike its peers is World Health Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
108 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 108 of the 144 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN FUND FOR EMMANUEL ↗
- Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
- Who funds POINT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PATHWAY TO POSSIBLE INC ↗
- Who funds MEENAKSHI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BAGLY INC ↗
- Who funds OUTRIGHT INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds GIFT OF ADOPTION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Crotched Mountain Foundation ↗
- Who funds FENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HARLEM EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES FUND INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Massachusetts Adoption Resource Exchange Inc ↗
- Who funds PERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND ↗
- Who funds Massachusetts Peace Action Education Fund ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds PRADER-WILLI SYNDROME ASSOCIATION (USA) ↗
- Who funds REACH BEYOND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Bay State Performing Arts Inc ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds GLBTQ LEGAL ADVOCATES & DEFENDERS INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Emory University ↗
- Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARAB-AMERICAN FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GALA CHORUSES I INC ↗
- Who funds The Arms Control Associations ↗
- Who funds NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS INC ↗
- Who funds South Bronx United Inc ↗
- Who funds MIRIAM'S KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds THE CARL SAFINA CENTER INC THE SAFINA CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Western Massachusetts · Paul & Edith Babson Foundation 106846-000 · Boston Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · The Irene E and George A Davis Foundation · The Beveridge Family Foundation · Tides Foundation · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · The Winky Foundation Co Wilmington Trust Co · Peoples United Community Foundation · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Susan a & Donald P Babson Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Pathway to Possible Inc — 84% of income from government
- Hitchcock Center for the Environment Inc — 55% of income from government
- Reach Beyond Domestic Violence Inc — 53% of income from government
- Mothers for Justice and Equality Inc — 43% of income from government
- South Africa Partners Inc — 42% of income from government
- The Performance Project Inc — 40% of income from government
- Bagly Inc — 39% of income from government
- Homework House Inc — 38% of income from government
- Fenway Community Health Center Inc — 27% of income from government
- The Treehouse Foundation Inc — 23% of income from government
- Silver Lining Mentoring Inc — 10% of income from government
- Berkshire Immigrant Center Inc — 9% of income from government
- Perkins School for the Blind — 7% of income from government
- Hilltown Village — 7% of income from government
- The Nolumbeka Project Inc — 5% of income from government
- Person to Person Inc — 5% of income from government
- Commonwealth Zoological Corporation D/B/a Zoo New England — 2% of income from government
- Bikes Not Bombs Inc — 2% of income from government
- Bay State Performing Arts Inc — 1% of income from government
- ME2 Orchestra Inc — 1% of income from government
- Neads Inc — 1% of income from government
- Breaktime United Inc — 1% of income from government
- Friends of the Public Garden Inc — 1% of income from government
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Emmanuel College — 0% of income from government
- Glbtq Legal Advocates & Defenders Inc — 0% of income from government
- Boston Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Susan a & Donald P Babson Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Susan a & Donald P Babson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.