· Private foundation
Supo Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k32 grants · $108k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $249k
- $250k+1 grant · $308k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE JEWISH WAR VETERANS POST #603 | $307,686 |
| MOTOR 4 TOYS | $43,441 |
| LASD YOUTH FOUNDATION | $35,215 |
| WEST VALLEY FOOD PANTRY | $30,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $16,017 |
| JAMES STOREHOUSE | $15,998 |
| HOME 4 FAMILIES | $15,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF VENTURA COUNTY | $11,998 |
| LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION | $11,211 |
| SAN FERNANDO RESCUE MISSION | $10,000 |
| THE GUARDIANS OF LOS ANGELES JEWISH HEALTH | $10,000 |
| PEDIATRIC VICTORY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| BLUE LINE DOGS LA | $10,000 |
| STAND WITH US | $10,000 |
| ISRAEL PARASPORT CENTER | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $107k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.
41 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $175k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMAPS Charities3× · 2020–2023 · $96k · revenue +43%
- OONEGENERATION2× · 2020–2022 · $89k · revenue +80%
- BBBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF VENTURA COUNTY INCORPORATED2× · 2023–2024 · $62k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $35k
- CSCARSON SHERIFF STATION SUPPORT FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $33k · revenue -25%
- WRWEST RANCH HIGH SCHOOLone grant, 2023 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…
The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…
To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).
Bikur cholim organizes and subsidizes medical treatment, speech and physical therapy, medication, durable medical equipment, blood products, homecare, transportation, housing for patients and family-members, meals, and diagnostics while…
The roots of the los angeles didi hirsch psychiatric service dba didi hirsch mental health services ("dhmhs") extend back to the 1930s, when a group of women funded psychiatric care for people whose lives were devastated by the depression.…
The organization's mission is to promote the collective voice of a diverse coalition of organizations and individuals working to eliminate all forms of domestic violence. as an advocate for sociate change, we advance our mission by…
We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…
The mission of Wayfinder Family Services is to ensure that children, youth and adults facing challenges always have a place to turn. Founded in 1953 as the Foundation for the Junior Blind, the organization initially enabled visually…
All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)
The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The James Storehouse Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Pediatric Victory Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
66 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 66 of the 120 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MAPS Charities ↗
- Who funds ONEGENERATION ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF VENTURA COUNTY INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds SHERIFFS YOUTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds MOTOR FOR TOYS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CARSON SHERIFF STATION SUPPORT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE THE MISSION ↗
- Who funds Casa Pacifica Centers for Children & Families ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC AREA BOOSTERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE ACADEMY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE JAMES STOREHOUSE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds OPEN ARMS FOOD PANTRY & RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC ↗
- Who funds LASDMOTORSPORTS ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OHANA ONE INTL SURGICAL AID ↗
- Who funds Glendale Adventist Medical Center Fdtn Adventist Health Glendale Foundation ↗
- Who funds NORTH HOLLYWOOD INTERFAITH FOOD PAN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The Annenberg Foundation · Sherwood Country Club Charitable Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · Ventura County Community Foundation · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Henry L Guenther Foundation · Shelter Partnership Inc · United Way Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Supo Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Aleph Institute Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Supo Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Supo Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.