· Private foundation
Summit Financial Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY | $5,000 |
| DIABLO VALLEY VETERANS FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| MEWATER FOUNDATION INCORPORATED | $1,000 |
| MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| THREE VALLEYS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $900 |
| ANEURYSM FOUNDATION | $500 |
| ROOMS OF HOPE INC | $500 |
| CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE | $500 |
| ROOMS OF HOPE INC | $500 |
| ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC | $500 |
| LAZAREX CANCER FOUNDATION | $500 |
| BAY AREA CRISIS NURSERY | $500 |
| CROSSWINDS CHURCH | $270 |
| MAYFLY PROJECT | $250 |
| WRESTLE LIKE A GIRL INC | $250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 21% of Summit Financial Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
15 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GIGIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY2× · 2023–2024 · $6k · revenue +23%
- ROROOMS OF HOPE INC3× · 2022–2024 · $3k · revenue +43%
- SISHELTER INC2× · 2018–2021 · $2k · revenue +135%
Funded once
- ALAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +14%
- GVGOODNESS VILLAGEone grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue +19%
- OHOPEN HEART KITCHEN OF LIVERMORE INCone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -38%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.
The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.
City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION
The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.
The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.
Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.
The mission of the breast cancer research foundation, inc. is to prevent and cure breast cancer by advancing the world's most promising research.
Our mission is to connect people to quality giving and volunteer opportunities worldwide. universalgiving is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization, whose vision is to create a world where giving and volunteering are a natural part of everyday…
Accelerating life science success.
The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.
Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope and the most unlike its peers is Newberrys Block. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds GOODNESS VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds OPEN HEART KITCHEN OF LIVERMORE INC ↗
- Who funds Global Impact ↗
- Who funds DOWN SYNDROME CONNECTION OF THE BAY AREA ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY JUNCTION INC ↗
- Who funds Missing Man Ministry Inc ↗
- Who funds ROOMS OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CNTR FNDN ↗
- Who funds Children International ↗
- Who funds BAY AREA CRISIS NURSERY ↗
- Who funds Lazarex Cancer Foundation ↗
- Who funds MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds HERS BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DAKIN PIONEER VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF SUICIDOLOGY ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Endurance with Jan & Dave Dravecky ↗
- Who funds ABILITY NOW BAY AREA INC ↗
- Who funds Culinary Angels ↗
- Who funds MEWATER FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds SONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KIDS AGAINST HUNGER BAY AREA ↗
- Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds SHE-CAN GLOBAL INC ↗
- Who funds DIABLO VALLEY VETERANS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CITYTEAM MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds EAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
- Who funds EAST BAY INTEGRATED CARE INC ↗
- Who funds Three Valleys Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds Newberrys BLOCK ↗
- Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · East Bay Community Foundation · Lowell Berry Foundation · Rotarian Foundation of Livermore · John Muir Health · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Community Health & Education Foundation · Neil & Amelia McDaniel Charitable Trust Dtd 11/01/77 · Fremont Bank Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Summit Financial Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Dougy Center Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Summit Financial Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Summit Financial Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.