Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Summerfield Foundation

Its FY2017 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$66k
Granted FY2017
30
Grants FY2017
7
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2017 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k27 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Saint Joseph Hospital$10,000
The Myositis Association$10,000
Share Our Selves$10,000
Cal State Fullerton$7,125
USC Cardinal and Gold$6,100
Franciscan Friars$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,500
Chapman University$2,000
Santa Fe Springs Chamber of Commerc$1,700
CHOC HospitalLittlest Angel Guild$1,600
Santa Fe Springs Youth Enrichment F$1,500
American Diabetes Association$1,000
The Nagourney Institute$1,000
American Cancer Society$1,000
World Eye Cancer Hope USA$1,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%The Myositis Association: $10k → 9%Share Our Selves: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American College of Radiology

The american college of radiology (acr) is organized to advance radiology science, practice and access, improve quality and safety, provide continuing education for radiology and allied professionals, and achieve better outcomes through…

Health
2
American College of Rheumatology Inc

The american college of rheumatology is an organization of and for physicians, health professionals, and scientists that advances rheumatology through programs of education, research, advocacy and practice support that foster excellence in…

3
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
4
Association for Computing Machinery Inc

We are an intl. scientific & educational org. dedicated to advancing art, science & technology.

Science & Tech
5
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
6
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
7
The Central European University

Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…

International
8
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
9
American College of Surgeons

The american college of surgeons is dedicated to improving the care of the surgical patient and to safeguarding standards of care in an optimal and ethical practice environment.

Education
10
The Scripps Research Institute

The scripps research institute ("tsri") performs high impact basic biomedical research, improves the human condition by fostering translation of its discoveries into useful products and engages in the highest quality graduate scientific…

Health
11
American College of Radiology Association

The purpose of the association is the promotion of educational and professional association interests including but not limited to the promotion of the interests of radiology and the interests and study of the socioeconomic aspects of the…

Community Improvement
12
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Council of Trustees and Alumni and the most unlike its peers is The Nagourney Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Saint Joseph Hospital — $10,000 · OtherSaint Joseph HospitalCal State Fullerton — $7,125 · OtherCal State FullertonUSC Cardinal and Gold — $6,100 · OtherUSC Cardinal and GoldFranciscan Friars — $5,000 · OtherFranciscan FriarsIndividual grant recipient — $4,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSanta Fe Springs Chamber of Commerc — $1,700 · OtherCHOC HospitalLittlest Angel Guild — $1,600 · OtherSanta Fe Springs Youth Enrichment F — $1,500 · Other+11 more — $2,923 · Other+11 moreShare Our Selves Corporation — $10,000 · Human ServicesShare Our Selves CorporationThe Myositis Association — $10,000 · Human ServicesThe Myositis AssociationCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY — $2,000 · EducationThe Prentice School — $100 · EducationAmerican Diabetes Association — $1,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $1,000 · HealthTHE NAGOURNEY INSTITUTE — $1,000 · PhilanthropyCAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER — $100 · PhilanthropySOUTH COAST REPERTORY INC — $300 · Arts & CultureCHARLES W BOWERS MUSEUM CORPORATION — $200 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN COUNCIL OF TRUSTEES AND ALUMNI — $100 · Arts & Culture
Other$40,448Human Services$20,000Education$2,100Health$2,000Philanthropy$1,100Arts & Culture$600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetShare Our Selves Corporation — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Myositis Association — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NAGOURNEY INSTITUTE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYORBA LINDA SUNRISE ROTARY — $593 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSOUTH COAST REPERTORY INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLES W BOWERS MUSEUM CORPORATION — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COUNCIL OF TRUSTEES AND ALUMNI — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Prentice School — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Share Our Selves Corporation
  • Who funds The Myositis Association
  • Who funds CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association
  • Who funds THE NAGOURNEY INSTITUTE
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds YORBA LINDA SUNRISE ROTARY
  • Who funds SOUTH COAST REPERTORY INC
  • Who funds CHARLES W BOWERS MUSEUM CORPORATION
  • Who funds AMERICAN COUNCIL OF TRUSTEES AND ALUMNI
  • Who funds The Prentice School
  • Who funds CAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Summerfield Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph