· Private foundation
Sue & Edgar Wachenheim Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.4M
- $250k+9 grants · $27M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART | $12,135,000 |
| MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING | $7,500,000 |
| COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS | $3,000,000 |
| HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY FOUNDATION | $1,000,000 |
| OCEANA INC | $1,000,000 |
| AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE | $750,000 |
| SKIDMORE COLLEGE | $650,000 |
| THE CARVER CENTER | $500,000 |
| WNET | $250,000 |
| FRIENDS OF RYE TOWN PARK | $200,000 |
| EAGLE HILL SCHOOL | $200,000 |
| THE CLARK INSTITUTE | $200,000 |
| GREENWICH HOSPITAL | $200,000 |
| CARAMOOR CENTER FOR MUSIC AND ARTS | $100,000 |
| THE NEW YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $2.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
30 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9.5M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MOMuseum of Modern Art6× · 2020–2025 · $55M · revenue +38%
- SCSKIDMORE COLLEGE6× · 2020–2025 · $9.1M · revenue +19%
Williams College5× · 2020–2025 · $8.1M · revenue +51%
Funded once
- THThe Hospital for Special Surgery Fund Incgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $2.0M · revenue +40%
- 1F1898 FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue -76% · 43% of their budget
- MOMUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue +131%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."
The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.
The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).
Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…
Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…
The Frick Collection (the "Collection") operates an internationally recognized art museum and library program for the inspiration and enjoyment of the public and for the advancement of the study of fine arts and kindred subjects.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Museum of Manhattan and the most unlike its peers is Focus for a Future Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 49 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds WNET ↗
- Who funds SKIDMORE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Williams College ↗
- Who funds OCEANA INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE JAY HERITAGE CENTER ↗
- Who funds The Hospital for Special Surgery Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds RYE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds GREENWICH HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds STERLING AND FRANCINE CLARK ART INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds BLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds 1898 FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations ↗
- Who funds Caramoor Center for Music & the Arts Inc ↗
- Who funds READWORKSINC ↗
- Who funds THE FRIENDS OF GREEN CHIMNEYS ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION ↗
- Who funds FOCUS FOR A FUTURE INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF RYE TOWN PARK INC ↗
- Who funds RYE FREE READING ROOM ↗
- Who funds THE RECTORY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds ADIRONDACK FORTY-SIXERS INC ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK HALL OF SCIENCE ↗
- Who funds PLAYWRIGHTS HORIZONS INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MANHATTAN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Chess Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The New York Community Trust · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sue & Edgar Wachenheim Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Rectory School Inc — 0% of income from government
- Greenwich Hospital — 0% of income from government
- Williams College — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Sue & Edgar Wachenheim Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Sue & Edgar Wachenheim Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.