Skip to content

· Private foundation

Subak Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$412k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$740kArts & Culture$167kCrime & Legal$150kPhilanthropy$109kHousing & Shelter$95kScience & Tech$93kYouth Development$75kEnvironment$67kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $277k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$15,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MAINE FOUNDATION$50,000
GUILFORD COLLEGE$50,000
FRIENDS OF BERMUDA COMMUNITY FND$36,750
THE OCEAN FOUNDATION$30,000
FRANKLIN INSTITUTE$25,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ONTARIO ART GALLERY$25,000
M&A HOTLINE (POSSIBILITY LABS SPONSORED)$25,000
I NEED AN A (SOCIAL GOOD FUND SPONSORED)$25,000
PLAN C PILLS (POSSIBILITY LABS SPONSOR)$25,000
GLOBAL IMPACT FBO PRODUCTIVE FUTURES$25,000
COLGATE UNIVERSITY$25,000
MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE$15,000
PROJECT HOME$10,000
CRISTO REY PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MASTERWORKS MUSEUM$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RADNOR ABC: $3k → 6%PROJECT HOME: $25k → 22%MISERICORDIA HOME: $3k → 14%PROJECT HOME: $10k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
KY
VA
TN
NC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Subak Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Subak Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.9% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 21 repeat orgs$398k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
28

Total granted

$1.1M
$255k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+42%

Still filing today

62%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $143k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TO
    THE OSBORNE ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $150k · revenue +24%
  • TF
    THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE
    3× · 2021–2025 · $75k · revenue +60%
  • CU
    COLGATE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $70k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • UC
    ULSTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2021 · $36k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ART GALLERY OF ONTARIO INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -79%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS CANADIAN NATURE
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
5
Harvard Conservation Trust

To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.

Environment
6
Williams College

Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.

Education
7
Trustees of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens

The broad mission of the ASCSA has remained constant over its distinguished history: teaching research archaeological exploration publication and dissemination of research. Founded in 1881 the ASCSA provides graduate students and scholars…

Arts & Culture
8
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
9
Gettysburg College

Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
10
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
11
Fisk University

Fisk university produces graduates from diverse backgrounds with the integrity and intellect required for substantive contributions to society. our curriculum is grounded in the liberal arts. our faculty and administrators emphasize the…

Education
12
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wikimedia Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Osborne Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
16/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE OSBORNE ASSOCIATION INC: $150,000 · OtherTHE OSBORNE ASSOCIATION INCAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ONTARIO ART GALLERY: $80,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ONTARIO ART GALLERYFRIENDS OF BERMUDA COMMUNITY FND: $78,875 · OtherFRIENDS OF BERMUDA COMMUNITY FNDULSTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $36,000 · OtherPLAN C PILLS (POSSIBILITY LABS SPONSOR): $25,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS CANADIAN NATURE: $25,000 · OtherCAPE PLAYHOUSE: $25,000 · OtherM&A HOTLINE (POSSIBILITY LABS SPONSORED): $25,000 · OtherCAF AMERICA (CHARITIES AID FDN AMERICA): $25,000 · OtherGLOBAL IMPACT FBO PRODUCTIVE FUTURES: $25,000 · OtherI NEED AN A (SOCIAL GOOD FUND SPONSORED): $25,000 · OtherPROJECT HOME: $25,000 · Other+26 more: $180,375 · Other+26 moreGUILFORD COLLEGE: $336,000 · EducationGUILFORD COLLEGEUniversity of Maine Foundation: $150,000 · EducationUniversity of Maine FoundationCOLGATE UNIVERSITY: $70,000 · EducationCOLGATE UNIVERSITYCRISTO REY PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOL: $50,000 · EducationCRISTO REY PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOLPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College: $35,000 · Education+3 more: $35,500 · EducationTHE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE: $75,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ART GALLERY OF ONTARIO INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureFrom The Heart Productions: $10,000 · Arts & CultureHOT DOCS FOUNDATION USA INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureCAPE COD CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureWILD EARTH WILDERNESS SCHOOL: $52,500 · Youth DevelopmentPROJECT HOME: $35,000 · Human ServicesMISERICORDIA HOME: $2,500 · Human ServicesRadnor A Better Chance Inc: $2,500 · Human ServicesThe Ocean Foundation: $30,000 · EnvironmentTHE DENNIS CONSERVATION LAND TRUST: $5,000 · EnvironmentAMERICAN FRIENDS OF CANADIAN NATURE INC: $1,500 · EnvironmentHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $35,000 · International
Other$725,250Education$676,500Arts & Culture$120,000Youth Development$52,500Human Services$40,000Environment$36,500International$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGUILFORD COLLEGE: $336,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetTHE OSBORNE ASSOCIATION INC: $150,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUniversity of Maine Foundation: $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOLGATE UNIVERSITY: $70,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWILD EARTH WILDERNESS SCHOOL: $52,500 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetCRISTO REY PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOL: $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT HOME: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Ocean Foundation: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ART GALLERY OF ONTARIO INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $18,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetREACH OUT AND READ INC: $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFrom The Heart Productions: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COUNCIL FOR CANADIAN AMERICAN RELATIONS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILIES OF SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY DBA CURE SMA: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOT DOCS FOUNDATION USA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetTravis Manion Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DENNIS CONSERVATION LAND TRUST: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCAPE COD CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISERICORDIA HOME: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJ WOOD PLATT CADDIE SCHOLARSHIP TRUST: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRadnor A Better Chance Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF CANADIAN NATURE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GUILFORD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE OSBORNE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Maine Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds COLGATE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WILD EARTH WILDERNESS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CRISTO REY PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOME ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Middlebury College ↗
  • Who funds The Ocean Foundation ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ART GALLERY OF ONTARIO INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds REACH OUT AND READ INC ↗
  • Who funds From The Heart Productions ↗
  • Who funds THE COUNCIL FOR CANADIAN AMERICAN RELATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES OF SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY DBA CURE SMA ↗
  • Who funds HOT DOCS FOUNDATION USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY10.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Subak Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Subak Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Reach Out and Read Inc: 9% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Smith College: 1% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Subak Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph