Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Stroh Family Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$94k
Granted FY2020
44
Grants FY2020
7
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172020.

Recreation & Sports$99kReligion$52kHealth$31kHuman Services$20kHousing & Shelter$11kEducation$11kArts & Culture$8kInternational$7kOther$0
02FY2020 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k43 grants · $44k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$299k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOLF FORE AFRICA$50,250
MARRIAGE MATERIAL$2,000
PEACEMAKER MINNESOTA$2,000
SHARING AND CARING HANDS$2,000
ST DOMINIC MISSION$2,000
LISTENING HOUSE$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR$2,000
JEREMIAH PROGRAM$1,000
OUR LADY OF GRACE CHURCH$1,000
VAIL PLACE$1,000
PINKYSWEAR FOUNDATION$1,000
ST PETER CLAVER CATHOLIC SCHOOL$1,000
FELOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$1,000
ST STEPHENS HUMAN SERVICES$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PINKYSWEAR FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%PINKYSWEAR FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%PINKYSWEAR FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%SHARING AND CARING HANDS: $2k → 11%PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING: $500 → 11%PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING: $500 → 11%RELATE COUNSELING CENTER: $1k → 11%HAMMER RESIDENCES INC: $100 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
WI
NY
CT
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
AZ

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$227k · 36 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

36 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2020, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
18

Total granted

$227k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+60%

Still filing today

44%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterReligionYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JP
    JEREMIAH PROGRAM
    4× · 2017–2020 · $8k · revenue +161%
  • VP
    VAIL PLACE
    4× · 2017–2020 · $4k · revenue +41%
  • AH
    AGATE HOUSING & SERVICES INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $4k · revenue +136%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • CK
    COURAGE KENNY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue -85%
  • SM
    ST MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pavillon International

To provide hope, healing, and lasting recovery to individuals and their families who suffer from alcoholism and other substance use related disorders.

Health
2
Pittsburgh Mercy Health System Inc

We, pittsburgh mercy health system (pittsburgh mercy) and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. pittsburgh mercy is a member of trinity…

Health
3
Global Partners in Care

The organization's mission is to build partnerships to enhance compassionate care globally. we are dedicated to improving access to hospice and palliative care worldwide.

International
4
Miracle Messages

Miracle messages helps people experiencing homelessness rebuild their social support systems and financial security, primarily through family reunification services, a phone buddy program, and basic income pilots.

Human Services
5
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
6
Missions Inc Programs

See Schedule O.Established in 1895, Missions Inc. Programs is a multi-service non-profit organization with a long history of providing services to those who are most in need, each year offering thousands of people, whose lives have been…

7
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
8
Mercy Life Inc

We, trinity health pace and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. mercy life is a member of trinity health pace and trinity health.

9
Mary's Shelter

Believing in the value of every life, mary's path empowers vulnerable teen mothers in foster care and their babies to create lives of dignity, hope and self-sufficiency.

Human Services
10
Pathways Hospice

Honoring every moment of life, pathways hospice provides compassionate, excellent, comprehensive care for those who have an advanced medical condition and those who are grieving.

Human Services
11
Touchstone Mental Health

Touchstone mental health provides innovative, person-centered services that foster hope, health and well-being. we envision a world where all people whose lives are affected by mental illness will flourish with effective treatment, quality…

Human Services
12
Villa Mary Immaculate

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. villa mary immaculate is a member of st. peter's health partners…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Angel Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Cornerstone. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDevelopmental Disabilities …Senior Support ServicesSubstance Abuse TreatmentChristian Missionary Organi…Community Health CentersHomeless Services & ShelterDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Cancer Support Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%35%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr16%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%54%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr16%21%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,534

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
21/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GOLF FORE AFRICA INC — $96,750 · OtherGOLF FORE AFRICA INCCHURCH OF ASCENSION — $8,500 · OtherLISTENING HOUSE — $8,000 · Other+39 more — $86,500 · Other+39 moreTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · HealthVAIL PLACE — $4,000 · HealthVerdeCares Inc — $2,500 · HealthANGEL FOUNDATION — $1,000 · HealthPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · HealthMAGGIE'S PLACE INC — $4,000 · Human ServicesPINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION — $2,500 · Human ServicesSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesRelate Inc — $1,000 · Human Services+1 more — $100 · Human ServicesJEREMIAH PROGRAM — $8,000 · Housing & ShelterTRINITY SOBER HOMES — $2,000 · Housing & ShelterAGATE HOUSING & SERVICES INC — $4,000 · ReligionTHE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE — $500 · ReligionFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentCORNERSTONE — $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentPEACEMAKER MINNESOTA — $2,000 · EducationHOPE 4 KIDS INTERNATIONAL — $500 · InternationalOPERATION SMILE INC — $500 · International
Other$199,750Health$18,500Human Services$10,600Housing & Shelter$10,000Religion$4,500Youth Development$3,000Education$2,000International$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGOLF FORE AFRICA INC — $96,750 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARRIAGE MATERIAL — $5,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetVAIL PLACE — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAGATE HOUSING & SERVICES INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAGGIE'S PLACE INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVerdeCares Inc — $2,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetPINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY SOBER HOMES — $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPEACEMAKER MINNESOTA — $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOURAGE KENNY FOUNDATION — $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAVIS PHINNEY FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANGEL FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRelate Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DYNAMIC CATHOLIC INSTITUTE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE 4 KIDS INTERNATIONAL — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHammer Residences Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GOLF FORE AFRICA INC
  • Who funds THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM
  • Who funds MARRIAGE MATERIAL
  • Who funds VAIL PLACE
  • Who funds AGATE HOUSING & SERVICES INC
  • Who funds MAGGIE'S PLACE INC
  • Who funds VerdeCares Inc
  • Who funds PINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TRINITY SOBER HOMES
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
  • Who funds PEACEMAKER MINNESOTA
  • Who funds SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC
  • Who funds UNIFORMS FOR HOPE
  • Who funds COURAGE KENNY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds DAVIS PHINNEY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ANGEL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Catholic Community Foundation of MinnesotaMN19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Catholic Community Foundation of Minnesota · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · The K Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Sauer Family Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Baird Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Stroh Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph