Loading…
· Public charity
Strengthen Orlando Inc
Organized exclusively for charitable, scientific, testing for public safety, literary and/or educational purposes, and/or to foster national or international amateur sports competition and/or for the prevention of cruelty to children or animals.
$121k
Granted FY2024
2
Grants
1
Communities
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
0171% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2024.
Environment$145kCommunity Improvement$97kHuman Services$43kCrime & Legal$32kYouth Development$25kOther$143k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
—
2020
neighborhoodimprovementshoaclear lakehomeowners
2022
youngcircumstancessheltereducationadvocacy
2023
—
2024
improvements
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 2 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
- School Board of Orange County Florida$7,000
- Children's Safety Village of Central Florida$7,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Orlando Health Medical Group Inc
Outpatient and physician support services. provision of specialty physician services, outpatient physician billing services provided on behalf of exempt affiliates.
Health
2
Orlando Center for Justice
Orlando Center for Justice, Inc.s mission is to bridge the access to justice gap in Florida for newcomers by helping these underserved communities navigate the legal system through education and innovation.
Crime & Legal
3
Serve Orlando Inc
We provide easy and affordable ways to serve in Central Florida; we hope to encourage groups to choose our area for mission trips and in turn, create a lasting impact on those in need. Through established relationships with our community,…
Unclassified
4
One Orlando Alliance Inc
To unite lgbtq+ serving organizations in central florida through advocacy, community transformation, organizational development, and resource sharing.
Civil Rights
5
Centro De Adoracion Nueva Vision De Orlando Inc
—
6
Shelter Providers of Orlando Inc
Homeaid's mission is to help people experiencing or at risk of homelessness build new lives through construction, community engagement and education.
—
7
Diocesan Council of Orlando
To provide services and goods for disadvantaged persons.
—
8
Orlando Community & Youth Trust Inc
To support the mission of the city of orlandos department of families, parks, and recreation (fpr)
Education
9
Orlando Neighborhood Improvement Foundation Inc
Support the activities and charitable mission of ORLANDO NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION, INC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation ("ONIC").
—
10
Downtown Arts District Inc
To lead, stimulate, and guide the development of a vibrant, innovative arts and cultural district that enhances economic development in downtown orlando.
Arts & Culture
11
Orlando Firefighters Benevolent
Assist firefighters and their families in emergency situations.
Human Services
12
Orlando Sports Foundation
The mission of the orlando sports foundation, inc. is to promote and provide well organized and efficient athletic and social events in the central florida community.
Philanthropy
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Victim Service Center of Central Florida Inc and the most unlike its peers is Orlando Land Trust Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Environment$144,507Other$142,677Community Improvement$97,000Human Services$43,000Crime & Legal$32,000Youth Development$25,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ORLANDO LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds City District Inc ↗
- Who funds ORLANDO POLICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LGBT Plus Center Orlando Inc ↗
- Who funds Zebra Coalition Inc ↗
- Who funds Victim Service Center of Central Florida ↗
- Who funds HARBOR HOUSE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA ↗
- Who funds Children's Safety Village of Central Florida ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Orlando Health IncFL15.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Orlando Health Inc · Lift Orlando Inc · Universal Orlando Foundation Inc · Adventist Health SystemSunbelt Inc · Central Florida Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation Strengthen Orlando Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Harbor House of Central Florida Inc — 24% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: City District Inc.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~7 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 272853658 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on City District Inc, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 7 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 79% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Strengthen Orlando Inc?
Find your warmest path to Strengthen Orlando Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines