Skip to content
Stratis Health at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Stratis Health

STRATIS HEALTH is a non-profit organization that leads collaboration and innovation is health care quality and safety, and serves as a trusted expert in facilitating improvement for people and communities.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$25MCommunity Improvement$110kFood & Nutrition$15kHuman Services$13kEnvironment$10kArts & Culture$5k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERFAITH ACTION OF GREATER SAINT PAUL$20,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS MINNESOTA INC$15,000
MINNESOTA PERINATEL ORGANIZATION$10,000
NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%MINNESOTA RIVER AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC: $13k → 15%URBAN BABY INC: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$25M · 5 repeat orgs$284k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
18

Total granted

$25M
$229k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+22%

Still filing today

40%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • M
    MPRO
    4× · 2017–2020 · $13M
  • MI
    METASTAR INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $11M · revenue +14% · 29% of their budget
  • CI
    CIRCLE IN THE FIELD
    2× · 2017–2019 · $40k

Funded once

  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
    one grant, 2018 · $21k
  • UF
    UNITY FAMILY HEALTHCARE
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +15%
  • PU
    PILLSBURY UNITED COMMUNITIES
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
2
Minnesota Hospital Association

Advance the health of individuals and communities through leadership, advocacy and collaboration on behalf of minnesota hospitals and health systems. vision: minnesotans are healthy and have access to the right care at the right time in…

Community Improvement
3
Open Cities Health Center Inc

Open Cities Health Center is a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) whose mission is to provide culturally competent primary and preventive healthcare services to a largely underserved population in the Twin Cities metropolitan area.

Health
4
Minnesota Center for Health Care Ethics

Assisting individuals in ethically informed decision making by generating and communication ethical concepts, principles and frameworks; exploring and researching diverse cultural perspectives; and promoting health care ethics education…

Health
5
Glencoe Regional Health Services

Glencoe regional health services exists to improve every life by offering high-quality, safe, and accessible healthcare. we are dedicated to strengthening healthcare by connecting our communities, enhancing the patient experience,…

Health
6
Minnesota Hospital Foundation

The minnesota hospital foundation works on strategies that include data-led quality and safety improvement, education, research, training and leadership to improve the health of minnesotans.

—
7
Mn Community Measurement

Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.

Health
8
United Hospital District

At United Hospital District, we exist to provide and promote appropriate health care services to the communities we serve, doing so in a safe and healing environment which supports our patient-centered care philosophy.

Health
9
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
10
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
11
Care Providers of Minnesota Foundation

To promote quality care in long term health care facilities through education and research.

—
12
The Foundation for Health Care Continuums

The mission of the foundation for health care continuums is to strengthen each community we serve by providing a wide spectrum of housing and health care services that honor the evolving, aging population.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healtheast Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Minnesota Association of Geriatrics Inspired Clinicians. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MPRO: $13,315,777 · OtherMPRO+12 more: $230,681 · OtherMETASTAR INC: $11,390,145 · HealthMETASTAR INC+7 more: $85,500 · HealthAPPETITE FOR CHANGE INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesMinnesota River Area Agency on Aging Inc: $13,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR ECONOMIC INCLUSION: $10,000 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $10,000 · Community ImprovementHEALTH PROFESSIONALS FOR A HEALTHY CLIMATE: $10,000 · EnvironmentKeane Sense of Rhythm Inc: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$13,546,458Health$11,475,645Human Services$28,000Community Improvement$20,000Environment$10,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMETASTAR INC: $11,390,145 over 4y, 29% of budgetCare Providers of Minnesota: $35,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetUNITY FAMILY HEALTHCARE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHEAST FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPILLSBURY UNITED COMMUNITIES: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRAICES SAGRADAS COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH: $20,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetHUEMAN PARTNERSHIP: $15,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetELY HEALTH AND HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetAPPETITE FOR CHANGE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMinnesota River Area Agency on Aging Inc: $13,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAnnex Teen Clinic Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CLINIC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTH PROFESSIONALS FOR A HEALTHY CLIMATE: $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetCENTER FOR ECONOMIC INCLUSION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMINNESOTA ALLIANCE FOR PATIENT SAFETY: $8,500 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetKeane Sense of Rhythm Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetRIVERWOOD HEALTHCARE CENTER & COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saint Paul & Minnesot…Otto Bremer TrustThe Minneapolis Found…Medica FoundationAndersen Corporate Fo…Greater Twin Cities U…Catholic Community Fo…Mightycause Charitabl…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Saint Paul & Minnesota FoundationMN17.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · The Minneapolis Foundation · Medica Foundation · Andersen Corporate Foundation · Greater Twin Cities United Way · Catholic Community Foundation of Minnesota · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stratis Health funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stratis Health. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stratis Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home