Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Stratis Health

STRATIS HEALTH is a non-profit organization that leads collaboration and innovation is health care quality and safety, and serves as a trusted expert in facilitating improvement for people and communities.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$25MCommunity Improvement$110kFood & Nutrition$15kHuman Services$13kEnvironment$10kArts & Culture$5k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERFAITH ACTION OF GREATER SAINT PAUL$20,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS MINNESOTA INC$15,000
NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE$10,000
MINNESOTA PERINATEL ORGANIZATION$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%MINNESOTA RIVER AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC: $13k → 15%URBAN BABY INC: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$25M · 5 repeat orgs$284k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
18

Total granted

$25M
$229k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+15%

Still filing today

40%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • M
    MPRO
    4× · 2017–2020 · $13M
  • MI
    METASTAR INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $11M · revenue +14% · 29% of their budget
  • CI
    CIRCLE IN THE FIELD
    2× · 2017–2019 · $40k

Funded once

  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
    one grant, 2018 · $21k
  • UF
    UNITY FAMILY HEALTHCARE
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +15%
  • RS
    RAICES SAGRADAS COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +15%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

2
Minnesota Hospital Association

Advance the health of individuals and communities through leadership, advocacy and collaboration on behalf of minnesota hospitals and health systems. vision: minnesotans are healthy and have access to the right care at the right time in…

Community Improvement
3
Open Cities Health Center Inc

Open Cities Health Center is a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) whose mission is to provide culturally competent primary and preventive healthcare services to a largely underserved population in the Twin Cities metropolitan area.

Health
4
Minnesota Center for Health Care Ethics

Assisting individuals in ethically informed decision making by generating and communication ethical concepts, principles and frameworks; exploring and researching diverse cultural perspectives; and promoting health care ethics education…

Health
5
Glencoe Regional Health Services

Glencoe regional health services exists to improve every life by offering high-quality, safe, and accessible healthcare. we are dedicated to strengthening healthcare by connecting our communities, enhancing the patient experience,…

Health
6
Minnesota Hospital Foundation

The minnesota hospital foundation works on strategies that include data-led quality and safety improvement, education, research, training and leadership to improve the health of minnesotans.

7
Mn Community Measurement

Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.

Health
8
United Hospital District

At United Hospital District, we exist to provide and promote appropriate health care services to the communities we serve, doing so in a safe and healing environment which supports our patient-centered care philosophy.

Health
9
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

10
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

11
Care Providers of Minnesota Foundation

To promote quality care in long term health care facilities through education and research.

12
The Foundation for Health Care Continuums

The mission of the foundation for health care continuums is to strengthen each community we serve by providing a wide spectrum of housing and health care services that honor the evolving, aging population.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healtheast Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Minnesota Association of Geriatrics Inspired Clinicians. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%15%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr19%20%20–35yr15%25%35–55yr14%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr19%0%20–35yr15%98%35–55yr14%1%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%1/27
the rest of the field
14%
1,999/14,184

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MPRO — $13,315,777 · OtherMPRO+12 more — $230,681 · OtherMETASTAR INC — $11,390,145 · HealthMETASTAR INC+7 more — $85,500 · HealthAPPETITE FOR CHANGE INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesMinnesota River Area Agency on Aging Inc — $13,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE — $10,000 · Community ImprovementCENTER FOR ECONOMIC INCLUSION — $10,000 · Community ImprovementHEALTH PROFESSIONALS FOR A HEALTHY CLIMATE — $10,000 · EnvironmentKeane Sense of Rhythm Inc — $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$13,546,458Health$11,475,645Human Services$28,000Community Improvement$20,000Environment$10,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMETASTAR INC — $11,390,145 over 4y, 29% of budgetCare Providers of Minnesota — $35,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetUNITY FAMILY HEALTHCARE — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAICES SAGRADAS COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH — $20,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetHEALTHEAST FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPILLSBURY UNITED COMMUNITIES — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetELY HEALTH AND HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetHUEMAN PARTNERSHIP — $15,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetAPPETITE FOR CHANGE INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMinnesota River Area Agency on Aging Inc — $13,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHEALTH PROFESSIONALS FOR A HEALTHY CLIMATE — $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAnnex Teen Clinic Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER FOR ECONOMIC INCLUSION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CLINIC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMINNESOTA ALLIANCE FOR PATIENT SAFETY — $8,500 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetRIVERWOOD HEALTHCARE CENTER & COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetKeane Sense of Rhythm Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saint Paul & Minnesota FoundationMN17.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · The Minneapolis Foundation · Medica Foundation · Andersen Corporate Foundation · Greater Twin Cities United Way · Catholic Community Foundation of Minnesota · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Stratis Health funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph