Skip to content

· Private foundation

Storehouse Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$161k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$359kPublic Benefit$158kInternational$135kHealth$97kArts & Culture$84kAnimals$61kHuman Services$48kFood & Nutrition$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FREEDOM HORSE RANCH$50,000
KENNETH H COOPER INSTITUTE$25,000
POWER POINT MINISTRIES$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
HOLY CROSS LUTHERAN CHURCH$10,000
ACH CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES$7,000
CREATION EVIDENCE MUSEUM$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
SOMERVELL COUNTY FOOD BANK$3,000
BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY$2,500
SOMERVELL HISTORY FOUNDATION$2,500
SPCA$2,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS$2,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PARKER COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGIN: $10k → 8%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%PARKER COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGIN: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IA
UT
CO
MO
KS
TN
DC
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$752k · 27 repeat orgs$424k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
25

Total granted

$752k
$326k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+14%

Still filing today

44%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $98k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalReligionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PM
    PowerPoint Ministries
    4× · 2020–2025 · $100k · revenue +16%
  • AC
    ACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES
    3× · 2022–2025 · $42k · revenue +39%
  • PC
    PARKER COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $20k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • FB
    FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH GLEN ROSE
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • NC
    NATIONAL COWGIRL MUSEUM AND HALL OF FAME INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $55k · revenue +387%
  • TC
    THE COOPER INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -98%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
One Tail At a Time West Texas

One tail at a time west texas otat wtx serves the rural communities of west texas by supporting animal shelter operations rescuing and sheltering homeless unwanted companion animals dogs and cats primarily arranging their veterinary care…

Animals
2
North Texas Australian Shepherd Rescue

NTASR helps rescue and rehabilitate Australian Shepherds, Border Collies, and mixes of the two.Thus far, several other breeds have made their way through the rescue including a doodle, a dachshund, a frenchie, and a shar pei. NTASR takes…

Animals
3
Spca of Texas

The spca of texas is dedicated to providing every animal exceptional care and a loving home.

Animals
4
Central Texas Animal Sanctuary

Animal rescue and rehabilitation

Animals
5
Fix West Texas

Fix West Texas mission is to lower the local euthanasia rate dogs and cats put to sleep in our local shelter due to lack of space and to lower intakes number of dogs and cats taken in by the local shelter and local rescues in our West…

Animals
6
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
7
Texas Coalition for Animal Protection

To prevent cruelty to animals, the texas coalition for animal protection (tcap) provides compassionate solutions to pet overpopulation and community animal welfare. tcap accomplishes this goal by making affordable, high quality…

Education
8
The Humane Society of Austin & Travis County Inc

The austin humane society (ahs) offers comprehensive, humane, life-saving animal services, transforming the lives of animals and those who love them. because we believe homeless animals deserve a chance to thrive in a loving environment,…

Animals
9
Arizona Humane Society

We save the most vulnerable animals and enrich the lives of pets and people.

Animals
10
The Texas Ferret Lovers Rescue

Texas Ferret Lovers Rescue is a no-kill organization dedicated to providing a safe and healthy environment along with quality care until loving homes can be found. We also provide sanctuary care for ferrets that are not adoptable due to…

Animals
11
Humane Society of the Pikes Peak Region

To offer compassionate care to animals, support safe communities, and provide socially conscious sheltering. (continued on schedule o)

Animals
12
Tulsa Spca

The Tulsa SPCA's mission is to improve the lives of dogs and cats, and their human companions.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ach Child and Family Services; the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH GLEN ROSE: $100,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH GLEN ROSEIndividual grant recipient: $82,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH FAIRFIELD: $60,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH FAIRFIELDST JUDE RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $49,000 · OtherST JUDE RESEARCH HOSPITALACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $42,000 · OtherACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICESHOLY CROSS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $35,000 · OtherSCOTTISH RITE FOR CHILDREN: $32,000 · OtherTHE COOPER INSTITUTE: $25,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF FAIRFIELD TEXAS INC: $25,000 · OtherKENNETH H COOPER INSTITUTE: $25,000 · Other+36 more: $273,950 · Other+36 moreBUT GOD MINISTRIES: $135,000 · InternationalBUT GOD MINIS…PowerPoint Ministries: $100,000 · ReligionPowerPoin…DFW COCKER SPANIEL RESCUE: $35,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $19,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $4,000 · AnimalsOPERATION KINDNESS: $3,000 · AnimalsNATIONAL COWGIRL MUSEUM AND HALL OF FAME INC: $55,000 · Arts & CultureSOMERVELL HISTORY FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Arts & CultureFreedom Horse Ranch LLC: $50,000 · HealthPARKER COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,000 · Human Services
Other$748,950International$135,000Religion$100,000Animals$61,000Arts & Culture$59,000Health$50,000Human Services$22,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBUT GOD MINISTRIES: $135,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetPowerPoint Ministries: $100,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetNATIONAL COWGIRL MUSEUM AND HALL OF FAME INC: $55,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $42,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDFW COCKER SPANIEL RESCUE: $35,000 over 4y, 8.1% of budgetTHE COOPER INSTITUTE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPARKER COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $19,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOMERVELL COUNTY FOOD BANK: $8,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $8,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOMERVELL HISTORY FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION KINDNESS: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALPINE AUTISM CENTER: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWEST TEXAS BOYS RANCH: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYoakum Project Show Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLAKE CHAPEL CEMETERY ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetPALUXY RIVER CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BUT GOD MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds PowerPoint Ministries ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COWGIRL MUSEUM AND HALL OF FAME INC ↗
  • Who funds Freedom Horse Ranch LLC ↗
  • Who funds ACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds DFW COCKER SPANIEL RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds THE COOPER INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds PARKER COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SOMERVELL COUNTY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH6.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Storehouse Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Storehouse Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Storehouse Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Storehouse Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Storehouse’s filings →

More from the funding graph