Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stock Yards Bank Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$398k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Education$480kEnvironment$300kHuman Services$150kRecreation & Sports$43kCommunity Improvement$25kPhilanthropy$25k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $283k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEST END SCHOOL$100,000
WATERFRONT BOTANICAL GARDENS$83,333
THE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC$50,000
RITA JUNE FOUNDATION INC$50,000
ONEWEST CORPORATION$25,000
YEW DELL BOTANICAL GARDENS INC$25,000
ST VINCENT DEPAUL CAPITAL$25,000
MERCY ACADEMY$20,000
EVOLVE502 INC$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RITA JUNE FOUNDATION INC: $50k → 15%RITA JUNE FOUNDATION INC: $50k → 15%THE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC: $50k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$880k · 6 repeat orgs$143k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue 0% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
1

Total granted

$880k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-4%

Still filing today

83%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WE
    West End School Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $400k · revenue -82%
  • WB
    WATERFRONT BOTANICAL GARDENS INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $250k · revenue +46%
  • RJ
    RITA JUNE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $100k

Funded once

  • PA
    PARKS ALLIANCE OF LOUISVILLE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $43k · revenue -4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western Kentucky Botanical Gardens Inc

The mission is to provide education to the local population on the wonders of our environment.

Environment
2
Legacy Greenscapes Inc

Legacy greenscapes, inc. mission is to provide continuing leadership and financial support to preserve legacy of and promote greenscapes located in the city of winchester, clark county, ky.

Environment
3
West End Opportunity Partnership

To invest in residents, non profits and businesses across louisvilles west end by providing the resources and opportunities necessary to drive responsible revitalization, foster economic growth and build a thriving community for all.

Community Improvement
4
Endeavor Louisville Inc

Endeavor Louisville is leading the high-impact entrepreneurship movement in Kentucky, Indiana and Ohio, catalyzing long-term economic growth by selecting, mentoring, and supporting the best high-impact entrepreneurs in our region.…

International
5
Rebound Inc

To create positive impact in housing and economic development, while helping families to have access to affordable, quality housing within our historic urban neighborhoods.

—
6
Treeslouisville Inc

Our mission is to improve the health and quality of life for louisville's current and future generations through a robust, equitable and diverse tree canopy.

Community Improvement
7
Westside Future Fund Inc

To advance a compassionate approach to neighborhood revitalization that creates a diverse, mixed-income community, improves the quality of life for current and future residents and elevates the historic westside's unique history and…

Human Services
8
Denver Botanic Gardens Inc

The mission of denver botanic gardens is to connect people with plants, especially plants from the rocky mountain region and similar regions around the world, providing delight and enlightenment to everyone.

Environment
9
Bartlett Arboretum Association Inc

To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.

Environment
10
Thrive By 5 Louisville Inc

Thrive by 5 louisville is making early learning a top priority for louisville, breaking down barriers for the future of our children and city.

Education
11
Eden Peopleplanet

To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.

International
12
Enroll Indy Inc

Enroll indy helps families choose schools that meet their children's needs by providing a one-stop enrollment process, school information that is relevant and easy to understand, and data to inform school improvement in indianapolis,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is EVOLVE502 Inc; the most unlike its peers is West End School Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
2/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

West End School Inc: $400,000 · EducationWest End School IncWATERFRONT BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $249,999 · EnvironmentWATERFRONT BOTANICAL GARDENS INCYEW DELL INC: $50,000 · EnvironmentYEW DELL INCPARKS ALLIANCE OF LOUISVILLE INC: $42,852 · EnvironmentPARKS ALLIANCE OF LOUISVILLE INCRITA JUNE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesRITA JUNE FOUNDA…THE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOME OF THE …EVOLVE502 INC: $40,000 · OtherEVOLVE502 I…ACADEMY OF OUR LADY OF MERCY: $40,000 · OtherACADEMY OF …ST VINCENT DEPAUL CAPITAL: $25,000 · OtherST VINCENT …ONEWEST CORPORATION: $25,000 · Community Improvement
Education$400,000Environment$342,851Human Services$150,000Other$105,000Community Improvement$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWest End School Inc: $400,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetWATERFRONT BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $249,999 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetRITA JUNE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYEW DELL INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetPARKS ALLIANCE OF LOUISVILLE INC: $42,852 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetEVOLVE502 INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Gheens Foundation IncKY17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Gheens Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Lift a Life Foundation Inc · W L Lyons Brown Foundation · Cralle Foundation Inc · LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · Gardner Foundation Incorporated · James Graham Brown Foundation Inc · Sociable Weaver Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stock Yards Bank Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stock Yards Bank Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Stock Yards Bank Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Stock Yards Bank Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stock Yards Bank’s filings →

    More from the funding graph