Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stine Family Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2026still arriving
6
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$5.2MHousing & Shelter$1.0MPhilanthropy$794kArts & Culture$250kFood & Nutrition$160kEnvironment$23kHealth$13kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2026 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k3 grants · $3k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $111k
  • $250k+2 grants · $952k
$111,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$22M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DRAKE UNIVERSITY$500,000
Buena Vista University$452,317
RIDE THE THIN BLUE LINE$111,000
WHITEROCK CONSERVANCY$1,000
ADM Scholarship Foundation$1,000
CULTUREALL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YOUTH AND SHELTER SERVICES INC: $3k → 10%YOUNG WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 50% of Stine Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in IA; by stated purpose, 50%.

Stine Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.2M · 9 repeat orgs$328k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2026, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
11

Total granted

$8.2M
$217k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+51%

Still filing today

78%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $111k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesReligionHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DRAKE UNIVERSITY
    10× · 2017–2026 · $4.7M · revenue +20%
  • Buena Vista University
    4× · 2023–2026 · $1.4M · revenue +13%
  • SM
    SPURGEON MANOR INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $1.0M · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • IF
    IOWA FFA FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $150k · revenue +51%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
State University of Iowa Alumni Association

Our mission is to strengthen the university of iowa through alumni engagement. we do this through our communications, alumni programs, and events.

—
2
State University of Iowa Foundation

The university of iowa center for advancement's mission is to advance the university of iowa through engagement and philanthropy. we serve our alumni and friends in the state and the region, throughout the country, and around the world. we…

Education
3
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
4
Grand View University

Engages, equips and empowers learners to explore their vocations, fulfill their potential and serve the world.

Education
5
Iowa State University Foundation

Aligning donor passion and generosity to advance iowa state university's land grant ideals.

Education
6
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
7
Intertribal Agriculture Council

The intertribal agriculture council was founded in 1987 to pursue and promote the conservation, development and use of our agricultural resources of american indian and alaska native tribes.

—
8
Iowa Soybean Association

The iowa soybean association (isa) is driven to deliver increased soybean demand through market development and new uses, farmer-focused research and results, timely information and know-how, and policy initiatives enabling farmers and the…

—
9
Iowa City Area Chamber of Commerce

Our mission is to inspire the iowa city area to be greater by: 1) elevating business, 2) investing in strategic initiatives, and 3) advocating for the economic resiliency of the greater community.

—
10
Iowa Natural Heritage Foundation

This member-supported organization protects and restores iowa's land, water and wildlife for future generations. priorities include permanent land protection, promotion of improved land management and bringing new conservation…

Environment
11
Cornell College

Cornell college offers an innovative and rigorous learning community where faculty and staff collaborate with students to develop the intellectual curiosity, creativity and moral courage necessary for a lifetime of learning and engaged…

Education
12
Iowa Institute for Cooperatives

The objective, powers, and purposes of this association shall be to associate the members thereof together into a society for the purpose of promoting the interests and welfare of iowa cooperatives by any appropriate means but specifically…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Whiterock Conservancy; the most unlike its peers is Simon Estes Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DRAKE UNIVERSITY: $4,700,000 · EducationDRAKE UNIVERSITYBuena Vista University: $1,422,283 · EducationBuena Vista UniversitySIMON ESTES FOUNDATION: $780,000 · EducationSIMON ESTES FOUNDATIONSPURGEON MANOR INC: $1,010,000 · HealthSPURGEON MANO…IOWA FFA FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 · OtherRIDE THE THIN BLUE LINE INC: $111,000 · OtherADM Scholarship Foundation: $14,000 · Other+9 more: $72,000 · OtherCULTUREALL INC: $251,000 · Arts & CultureBRENTON ARBORETUM INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureYOUNG WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER: $3,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH AND SHELTER SERVICES INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesWHITEROCK CONSERVANCY: $4,000 · EnvironmentKOKOMO URBAN OUTREACH INC: $3,000 · Religion
Education$6,902,283Health$1,010,000Other$347,000Arts & Culture$261,000Human Services$6,000Environment$4,000Religion$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDRAKE UNIVERSITY: $4,700,000 over 10y, 0.3% of budgetBuena Vista University: $1,422,283 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSPURGEON MANOR INC: $1,010,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetSIMON ESTES FOUNDATION: $780,000 over 5y, 99% of budgetCULTUREALL INC: $251,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRENTON ARBORETUM INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetON WITH LIFE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAGRIBUSINESS ASSOCIATION OF IOWA: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetWHITEROCK CONSERVANCY: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH AND SHELTER SERVICES INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER CONNECTION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DRAKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Buena Vista University ↗
  • Who funds SPURGEON MANOR INC ↗
  • Who funds SIMON ESTES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CULTUREALL INC ↗
  • Who funds IOWA FFA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds BRENTON ARBORETUM INC ↗
  • Who funds ON WITH LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds AGRIBUSINESS ASSOCIATION OF IOWA ↗
  • Who funds WHITEROCK CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH AND SHELTER SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S CANCER CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds KOKOMO URBAN OUTREACH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community FdnIA22.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Lsb Foundation · Golf Charitable Foundation of Greater Des Moines · Ita Group Foundation · Prairie Meadows Race Track and Casino Inc · United Way Worldwide · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stine Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stine Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Stine Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Stine Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stine Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph