Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Stillson Foundation Fifth Third Bank Na

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$430k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Arts & Culture$1.2MHuman Services$410kEducation$135kHealth$80kFood & Nutrition$50kYouth Development$50kCrime & Legal$40kReligion$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $180k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $250k
$30,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$8.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CINCINNATI THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND HORSEM$50,000
1N5$50,000
LEARNING GROVE INC$50,000
STEPPING STONES INC$50,000
CINCINNATI OBSERVATORY CENTER$50,000
FOCUS ON YOUTH INC$30,000
MINDPEACE CINCINNATI$30,000
SANTA MARIA COMMUNITY SERVICES$30,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR MUSIC EDUCATION$25,000
BREAKTHROUGH CINCINNATI INC$25,000
SWEET CHEEKS DIAPER BANK$15,000
CASA FOR CLERMONT KIDS$15,000
LITERACY NETWORK OF GREATER CINNATI$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $345k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FOCUS ON YOUTH INC: $30k → 12%SWEET CHEEKS DIAPER BANK: $15k → 16%STEPPING STONES INC: $50k → 16%STEPPING STONES INC: $50k → 16%STEPPING STONES INC: $50k → 16%SWEET CHEEKS DIAPER BANK: $30k → 16%SANTA MARIA COMMUNITY SERVICES: $30k → 16%FOREVER KINGS INC: $25k → 16%ST JOSEPH INFANT & MATERNITY HOME: $50k → 16%A KID AGAIN INC: $15k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 5 repeat orgs$840k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
15

Total granted

$1.3M
$485k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+51%

Still filing today

100%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $355k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureFood & NutritionReligionPhilanthropyEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    STEPPING STONES INC
    3× · 2021–2025 · $150k · revenue +12%
  • CG
    COVERD GREATER CINCINNATI
    2× · 2023–2025 · $45k · revenue +9%
  • LN
    LITERACY NETWORK OF GREATER CINCINNATI DBA QUEEN CITY BOOK BANK
    2× · 2024–2025 · $35k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • SS
    SCHEDULE SCHEDULE ATTACHED
    one grant, 2019 · $70k
  • AL
    American Legacy Theatregraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +374% · 34% of their budget
  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES
    one grant, 2022 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Children's Theatre of Cincinnati

The mission of The Children's Theatre of Cincinnati (TCT) is to educate, entertain and engage audiences of all ages through professional theatrical productions and arts education programming. Our vision is to awaken a lifelong love of…

Arts & Culture
2
Cincinnati Early Learning Centers Inc

The organization operates and provides quality childcare in a nurturing and learning environment in multiple locations.

3
Cincinnati Center for Autism

We support individuals with autism and their families through programming in the areas of academics, adaptive behavior, communication, and social participation.

Education
4
Cincinnati Arts and Technology Center

Unlocking the self-worth and potential of at-risk teens through the transformative power of art, a first-class environment and a character-building culture. Equipping at-risk teens with skills, credentials and pathways to employment.…

5
Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra

Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra (CCO) creates intimate, transformative experiences that connect the musically curious.

Arts & Culture
6
School Choice Ohio Inc

The mission of school choice ohio is to protect and expand children's educational options through ensuring choice in quality schools and other places of learning, thereby supporting systemic reform of k-12 education across the state.

Education
7
Cincinnati Aquatic Club

To offer children and young adults a top quality program that develops, trains and competes as competitive swimmers year-round in a supportive and motivating enviroment that respects, challenges and nurtures them as athletes, students, and…

Recreation & Sports
8
World Affairs Council - Cincinnati & Northern Kentucky

The World Affairs Council, a 501(c)3 nonprofit, is the bridge that connects the world to one of America's most vibrant regions. Through Global education, International exchange, and cultural awareness initiatives, the council strengthens…

9
Child & Adolescent Behavioral Health

We are the premier childrens mental health agency that reduces the suffering experienced by children who have emotional problems related to depression, anxiety, and behavior like adhd. untreated, these problems can lead to failure in…

10
Cincinnati Usa Regional Chamber

To grow the vibrancy and economic prosperity of the cincinnati region.

11
Advocates for Kids

Advocates for Kids is committed to providing service and/or supporting organizations that serve children by providing experiences that empower them to realize their full potential. Advocates for Kids envisions children achieving a clearer…

Youth Development
12
Cincinnati Public Radio Inc

Cincinnati Public Radio is the trusted, independent source of journalism, music and culture empowering a vibrant, engaged and informed community.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crayons and Beyond Inc and the most unlike its peers is MISSION2MOVE. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDisability Residential Serv…Youth Education & Developme…Substance Abuse & Mental He…Youth Residential Care & Su…Food Assistance & Community…Cincinnati Arts & Culture O…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr13%8%5–10yr18%21%10–20yr15%25%20–35yr14%29%35–55yr20%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr13%3%5–10yr18%9%10–20yr15%9%20–35yr14%64%35–55yr20%16%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
12%
1,051/8,659

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
15/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER — $1,000,000 · Arts & CultureCINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTERCincinnati Institute of Fine Arts — $75,000 · Arts & CultureCincinnati Institute of Fine ArtsCINCINNATI OBSERVATORY CENTER — $50,000 · Arts & CultureAmerican Legacy Theatre — $50,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $45,000 · Arts & CultureSCHEDULE SCHEDULE ATTACHED — $70,000 · OtherSCHEDULE SCHEDULE ATTA…CINCINNATI THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND HORSEM HORSEMANSHIP — $50,000 · OtherCINCINNATI THERAPEUTIC…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES — $50,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE …1N5 — $50,000 · Other1N5LEARNING GROVE INC — $50,000 · OtherLEARNING GROVE INCCOUNCIL ON CHILD ABUSE — $40,000 · OtherCOUNCIL ON CHILD ABUSELITERACY NETWORK OF GREATER CINCINNATI DBA QUEEN CITY BOOK BANK — $35,000 · OtherLITERACY NETWORK OF GR…PARACHUTE SPECIAL ADVOCATES FOR CHI — $20,000 · OtherLEAD TRAINING — $25,000 · OtherLEAD TRAININGBreakthrough Cincinnati Inc — $25,000 · OtherBreakthrough Cincinnat…CASA FOR CLERMONT KIDS — $15,000 · OtherSTEPPING STONES INC — $150,000 · Human ServicesSTEPPING STONES IN…St Joseph Infant and Maternity Home — $50,000 · Human ServicesSt Joseph Infant a…COVERD GREATER CINCINNATI — $45,000 · Human ServicesCOVERD GREATER CIN…SANTA MARIA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesSANTA MARIA COMMUN…FOCUS ON YOUTH INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesFOCUS ON YOUTH INCForever Kings Inc — $25,000 · Human ServicesForever Kings IncA KID AGAIN INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HUNGER ALLIANCE — $25,000 · Food & NutritionMISSION2MOVE — $25,000 · Food & NutritionLINCOLN HEIGHTS OUTREACH INC — $25,000 · ReligionWESLEY CHAPEL MISSION CENTER — $20,000 · ReligionMindPeace Cincinnati — $30,000 · EducationCRAYONS AND BEYOND INC — $25,000 · Philanthropy
Arts & Culture$1,220,000Other$430,000Human Services$345,000Food & Nutrition$50,000Religion$45,000Education$30,000Philanthropy$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER — $1,000,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetSTEPPING STONES INC — $150,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCincinnati Institute of Fine Arts — $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Legacy Theatre — $50,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetSt Joseph Infant and Maternity Home — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOVERD GREATER CINCINNATI — $45,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetLITERACY NETWORK OF GREATER CINCINNATI DBA QUEEN CITY BOOK BANK — $35,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetFOCUS ON YOUTH INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMindPeace Cincinnati — $30,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S HUNGER ALLIANCE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION for MUSIC EDUCATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCRAYONS AND BEYOND INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetForever Kings Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetLINCOLN HEIGHTS OUTREACH INC — $25,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetLEAD TRAINING — $25,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetBreakthrough Cincinnati Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetMISSION2MOVE — $25,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetWESLEY CHAPEL MISSION CENTER — $20,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetCINCINNATI ARTS ASSOCIATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetA KID AGAIN INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCASA FOR CLERMONT KIDS — $15,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH35.7× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Andrew Jergens Foundation · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · Millstone Fund · Pfau Charitable Foundation · Charles H Dater Foundation Inc · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Jack J Smith Jr Charitable Trust · Josephine S Russell Charitable · United Way of Greater Cincinnati · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · The Thomas J Emery Memorial

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Stillson Foundation Fifth Third Bank Na funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph