Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Stillman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$726k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Human Services$11MInternational$785kHealth$500kFood & Nutrition$321kReligion$187kHousing & Shelter$150kPhilanthropy$100kCommunity Improvement$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $160k
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WE CHARITY$500,000
PRISM FOOD SHELF$60,000
SHALOM COUMMUNITY ALLIANCE$50,000
YMCA OF THE NORTH$50,000
BOOKS FOR AFRICA$45,000
MOBILE LOAVES TWIN CITIES$10,000
BUFFALO FOOD SHELF$10,000
PALM SPRING PATHFINDERS$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $10.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BOYS TOWN: $10k → 12%BUFFALO FOOD SHELF: $10k → 5%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $10.0M → 11%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $100k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $100k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $100k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $35k → 11%GLOBAL VILLAGE CONNECT: $2k → 11%GLOBAL VILLAGE CONNECT: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$13M · 14 repeat orgs$363k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
5

Total granted

$13M
$302k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+54%

Still filing today

50%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF MINNEAPOLIS
    5× · 2018–2023 · $10M · revenue +55% · 91% of their budget
  • YM
    YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTH
    3× · 2023–2025 · $160k · revenue +16%
  • BF
    BOOKS FOR AFRICA INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $135k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $150k
  • J
    JFCS
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • SF
    SUNTREE FOODS
    one grant, 2021 · $32k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Council of Nonprofits Inc

The Minnesota Council of Nonprofits informs, promotes, connects and strengthens individual nonprofits and the nonprofit sector.

Philanthropy
2
World Youth Connect

World Youth Connect builds communities across cultures and beyond borders. By creating and encouraging civic engagement opportunities we help young people gain the skills and experience they need to be successful. World Youth Connect…

Youth Development
3
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
4
Minnesota Leadership Council On Aging

The Minnesota Leadership Council on Aging is uniting leaders to advance equitable opportunities for all Minnesotans as we age.

Education
5
Feeding Our Communities Partners

Feeding Our Communities Partners (FOCP) has a mission to engage our community in solving youth hunger. We envision a community in which hunger is not a barrier to success and believe that feeding hungry students allows for active minds…

Food & Nutrition
6
North Country Food Alliance

The mission of North Country Food Alliance is to strengthen food sovereignty in the Twin Cities Metro Area. We do this through two main program areas: foodshare and gardening. Our foodshare program rescues overstock food that would…

Food & Nutrition
7
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St Cloud

At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…

Human Services
8
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

9
Minnesota Jewish Community Center

The minnesota jcc is dedicated to strengthening our community by providing inclusive programs that inspire personal growth, foster connection, and promote well-being through arts, culture, education, fitness, early childhood, day camp and…

10
Minnesota Jewish Community Center Foundation

The minnesota jcc foundation's sole purpose is to support the minnesota jcc.

Human Services
11
Global Communities

Global communities brings together local ingenuity and global insights to save lives and secure strong futures.

International
12
Minnesota Family Council

Minnesota family council (mfc) is a non-profit christian organization that is dedicated to strengthening minnesota families by advancing biblical principles in the public arena, for the glory of the lord jesus christ and the good of…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sholom Community Alliance and the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF MINNEAPOLIS — $10,335,028 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF MINNEAPOLIS+4 more — $184,155 · Human ServicesWE WELLBEING FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $500,000 · OtherWE WELLBEING FOU…WE CHARITY — $500,000 · OtherWE CHARITYPRISM FOOD SHELF — $186,000 · OtherPRISM FOOD SHELFJEWISH HOUSING & PROGRAMMING — $150,000 · OtherJEWISH HOUSING &…Individual grant recipient — $150,000 · OtherIndividual grant…ME TO WE FOUNDATION — $137,127 · OtherME TO WE FOUNDAT…JFCS — $100,000 · Other+4 more — $196,066 · Other+4 moreWE CHARITY WILLIAM C MORAN & ASSOC PC — $650,000 · InternationalBOOKS FOR AFRICA INC — $135,000 · InternationalSHOLOM COMMUNITY ALLIANCE — $250,000 · Housing & ShelterMOBILE LOAVES TWIN CITIES — $30,000 · Food & NutritionLake Street Council — $10,000 · Community ImprovementPALM SPRINGS PATHFINDERS INC — $1,000 · Philanthropy
Human Services$10,519,183Other$1,919,193International$785,000Housing & Shelter$250,000Food & Nutrition$30,000Community Improvement$10,000Philanthropy$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF MINNEAPOLIS — $10,335,028 over 5y, 91% of budgetWE CHARITY WILLIAM C MORAN & ASSOC PC — $650,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetSHOLOM COMMUNITY ALLIANCE — $250,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTH — $160,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOOKS FOR AFRICA INC — $135,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES TWIN CITIES — $30,000 over 3y, 8.6% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUFFALO FOOD SHELF — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLake Street Council — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGLOBAL VILLAGE CONNECT — $4,155 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetPALM SPRINGS PATHFINDERS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF MINNEAPOLIS
  • Who funds WE CHARITY WILLIAM C MORAN & ASSOC PC
  • Who funds SHOLOM COMMUNITY ALLIANCE
  • Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE NORTH
  • Who funds BOOKS FOR AFRICA INC
  • Who funds MOBILE LOAVES TWIN CITIES
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home
  • Who funds BUFFALO FOOD SHELF
  • Who funds Lake Street Council
  • Who funds GLOBAL VILLAGE CONNECT
  • Who funds PALM SPRINGS PATHFINDERS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Stillman Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Stillman Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Stillman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph