Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stiles Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$44k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$81kYouth Development$34kFood & Nutrition$33kReligion$32kInternational$20kRecreation & Sports$19kArts & Culture$12kHealth$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$301k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Normandale Community College Founda$10,000
VEAP$10,000
Oasis for Youth$2,500
Aavishkaar USA$2,500
Voyageurs Lutheran Ministry$2,500
International Village Clinic$2,500
PROP$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Three Rivers Park District Foundati$2,000
Cornerstone$2,000
Bloomington Symphony Orchestra$2,000
True Friends$1,000
The Rotary Foundation$1,000
Education Foundation of Bloomington$500
Minnesota Chiefs of Police Fdn$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Bravo Zulu House: $2k → 11%Ujamaa Place: $250 → 14%Ujamaa Place: $250 → 14%Youth Frontiers: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
IA
MD
NM
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$228k · 27 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
21

Total granted

$228k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+31%

Still filing today

63%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsInternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    Normandale Community College Foundation Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $46k · revenue +106%
  • OF
    OASIS FOR YOUTH
    5× · 2020–2025 · $18k · revenue +58%
  • AU
    AAVISHKAAR USA
    6× · 2020–2025 · $16k · revenue +187%

Funded once

  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +50%
  • NC
    Normandale Community College
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • BZ
    BRAVO ZULU HOUSE
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
2
The Minneapolis Foundation

The foundation cultivates generosity by taking action on the greatest civic, social, and economic needs partnering with nonprofits, facilitating grantmaking, driving research and advocacy, and providing services to donors seeking to make a…

Philanthropy
3
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
4
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
5
Northland Foundation

The northland foundation supports northeastern minnesota people and communities working toward a future where everyone feels they belong and can thrive.

Philanthropy
6
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
7
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
8
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce

Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.

—
9
St Paul Transportation Management Organization

Move minnesota leads the movement for an equitable and sustainable transportation system that puts people first. we are passionate about connecting communities, ending the climate crisis, expanding access to jobs and resources, and…

Environment
10
Breakthrough Twin Cities

Breakthrough Twin Cities supports students on their journey to college by fostering a community of mutual learning with the next generation of educators so they both can collaborate, grow, and thrive.

Education
11
Minnesota State Fair Foundation

The minnesota state fair foundation's mission is to preserve and improve the historic minnesota state fairgrounds and support state fair programs and projects in agriculture, arts & culture, education, the environment, and history.

Philanthropy
12
Mn Community Measurement

Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Conley Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/36
Grantees still filing
24/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Normandale Community College Foundation Inc: $46,000 · OtherNormandale Community College Foundation IncVEAP Inc: $29,000 · OtherVEAP IncST STEPHEN LUTHERAN CHURCH: $25,350 · OtherST STEPHEN LUTHERAN CHURCHOASIS FOR YOUTH: $18,000 · OtherOASIS FOR YOUTHEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF BLOOMINGTON: $7,000 · OtherTHREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC: $6,700 · Other+33 more: $47,610 · Other+33 moreAAVISHKAAR USA: $15,500 · InternationalAAVISHKAAR USAINTERNATIONAL VILLAGE CLINIC: $13,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL …THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $6,000 · InternationalTHE ROTARY FOU…+1 more: $500 · InternationalCORNERSTONE: $14,000 · Youth DevelopmentTRUE FRIENDS: $12,000 · Recreation & SportsONE HEARTLAND: $500 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $250 · Recreation & SportsMETAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC: $5,000 · HealthSteve Rummler Hope Network: $4,000 · HealthSouth Metro Community Services: $1,000 · HealthRonald McDonald House Global: $1,000 · Health+1 more: $250 · HealthSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $100 · EducationSAINT PAUL & MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyBLOOMINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Philanthropy
Other$179,660International$35,000Youth Development$14,000Recreation & Sports$12,750Health$11,250Education$10,100Philanthropy$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNormandale Community College Foundation Inc: $46,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetVEAP Inc: $29,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOASIS FOR YOUTH: $18,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetAAVISHKAAR USA: $15,500 over 6y, 4.7% of budgetCORNERSTONE: $14,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL VILLAGE CLINIC: $13,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetTRUE FRIENDS: $12,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF BLOOMINGTON: $7,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetTHREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC: $6,700 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT PAUL & MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSteve Rummler Hope Network: $4,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBLOOMINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetSPRINGBOARD FOR THE ARTS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION: $2,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBRAVO ZULU HOUSE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE BOND BETWEEN: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetACT UNITED: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetRonald McDonald House Global: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOMINGTON ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $750 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetNATIONAL LUTHERAN CHOIR CORP: $750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUJAMAA PLACE: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH FRONTIERS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARK NICOLLET FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE HEARTLAND: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH SPORTS FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONS HOSPITAL: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCARLETON COLLEGE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Normandale Community College Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds VEAP Inc ↗
  • Who funds OASIS FOR YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds AAVISHKAAR USA ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL VILLAGE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds TRUE FRIENDS ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF BLOOMINGTON ↗
  • Who funds THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds SAINT PAUL & MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds METAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC ↗
  • Who funds Steve Rummler Hope Network ↗
  • Who funds BLOOMINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGBOARD FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION ↗
  • Who funds BRAVO ZULU HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds THE BOND BETWEEN ↗
  • Who funds South Metro Community Services ↗
  • Who funds ACT UNITED ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Global ↗
  • Who funds BLOOMINGTON ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN22.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Margaret a Cargill Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Pohlad Family Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Tradition Family Foundation · The Jamf Nation Global Foundation · American Gift Fund · Charlson Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stiles Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stiles Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stiles’ filings →

    More from the funding graph