Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stewart Family Foundation Inc % James Newcomb

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$4.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$17MArts & Culture$8.5MHealth$2.1MHousing & Shelter$1.0MFood & Nutrition$648kHuman Services$561kRecreation & Sports$200kPhilanthropy$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $224k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $237k
  • $250k+2 grants · $4.7M
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$574k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TLC LEARNING CENTER$4,020,000
FRIENDS OF THE LONGMONT MUESUEM$658,000
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION$186,000
A WOMAN'S WORK$51,000
ROBERTAS LEGACY$45,000
SO ALL MAY EAT$35,000
LONGMONT MEALS ON WHEELS$25,000
WELD FOOD BANK$20,000
FRIENDS OF THE LONGMONT LIBRARY$20,000
SUNSHINE CLUB OF LONGMONT$20,000
STEPPING STONES OF WINDSOR$20,000
THE INN BETWEEN$15,000
OUR CENTER OF LONGMONT$13,500
RAABE FAMILY DENTISTRY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $754k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SO ALL MAY EAT: $45k → 12%SO ALL MAY EAT: $43k → 12%SO ALL MAY EAT: $35k → 12%SO ALL MAY EAT: $30k → 12%SO ALL MAY EAT: $30k → 12%SO ALL MAY EAT: $10k → 12%SO ALL MAY EAT: $10k → 12%A WOMAN'S WORK: $309k → 12%A WOMAN'S WORK: $100k → 12%A WOMAN'S WORK: $51k → 12%A WOMAN'S WORK: $41k → 12%A WOMAN'S WORK: $30k → 12%A WOMAN'S WORK: $20k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$29M · 17 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +109% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
6

Total granted

$29M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+109%
0%

Still filing today

65%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    TINY TIM CENTER INC DBA TLC LEARNING CENTER
    8× · 2018–2025 · $9.2M · revenue +121% · 53% of their budget
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE LONGMONT MUSEUM
    6× · 2020–2025 · $8.4M · revenue ×21 · 94% of their budget
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $7.0M · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • LU
    LONGMONT UNITED HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $1.0M · revenue -87% · 52% of their budget
  • BF
    BPS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $200k · revenue 0%
  • CO
    CITY OF LONGMONT MUSEUM
    one grant, 2019 · $80k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foothills Food Bank

The Foothills Food Bank works to ensure access to quality, nutritious food to community members in need, and deliver services with respect and dignity.

—
2
Harvest of Hope Pantry

Harvest of hope pantry's mission is to provide healthy supplemental food to boulder families and individuals in need of food assistance within a safe, welcoming and non-judgemental environment.

Food & Nutrition
3
Longmont Food Rescue

Our mission is to redistribute nutritious food that might otherwise go to waste to feed people experiencing food, housing, and financial insecurity, while educating local communities about food justice.

Food & Nutrition
4
Longmont Economic Development Partnership

Providing information and services to existing and prospective businesses and industries.

—
5
Fremont Co Library Foundn

Support of county libraries

—
6
Meals On Wheels of Boulder Inc

The mission of meals on wheels is to provide nutritious meals to residents of the community who need and want their services, regardless of age or income.

Food & Nutrition
7
The Colorado Health Foundation
Health
8
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
9
Friends of Mount Evans & Lost Creek Wildernesses

The Friends of Mount Evans & Lost Creek Wilderness (FOMELC) is a 501(c)3 charitable organization founded in November 2005. FOMELC is a 100% volunteer non-profit organization. We offer volunteer opportunities for all ages, physical…

Environment
10
Longs Peak Hospital Foundation

The mission of the longs peak hospital foundation exists to advance philanthropic innovation for healthy, extraordinary lives.

Health
11
Friends of a Womans Place

Raise funds for A Womans Place Inc. A domestic violance shelter. Through donations, sponsorships and memberships. Also, sponsor a GALA to recognize outstanding community members.

—
12
Denver Osteopathic Foundation
Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Longmont United Hospital Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Raabe Family Dentistry Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TINY TIM CENTER INC DBA TLC LEARNING CENTER: $9,230,830 · EducationTINY TIM CENTER INC DBA TLC LEARNING CENTERUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $6,996,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION+1 more: $3,500 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE LONGMONT MUSEUM: $8,366,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE LONGMONT MUSEUMLONGMONT UNITED HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 · OtherLONGMONT UNITE…SUNSHINE CLUB OF LONGMONT: $525,000 · OtherSUNSHINE CLUB …FRIENDS OF THE LONGMONT LIBRARY: $520,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE…THE INN BETWEEN: $515,000 · OtherTHE INN BETWEE…OUR CENTER OF LONGMONT: $413,500 · OtherOUR CENTER OF …LONGMONT MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $275,000 · OtherLONGMONT MEALS…BPS FOUNDATION: $200,000 · OtherESTES VALLEY LIBRARY FRIENDS AND FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 · Other+5 more: $215,500 · Other+5 moreA WOMAN'S WORK INC: $556,000 · Human ServicesSO ALL MAY EAT INC: $202,500 · Human ServicesROBERTA'S LEGACY: $535,000 · HealthWELD FOOD BANK: $170,000 · Food & NutritionSTEPPING STONES OF WINDSOR: $120,000 · Housing & ShelterHAVEN OF HOPE: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Education$16,230,330Arts & Culture$8,366,000Other$3,814,000Human Services$758,500Health$535,000Food & Nutrition$170,000Housing & Shelter$120,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTINY TIM CENTER INC DBA TLC LEARNING CENTER: $9,230,830 over 8y, 53% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE LONGMONT MUSEUM: $8,366,000 over 6y, 94% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $6,996,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetLONGMONT UNITED HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 over 1y, 52% of budgetA WOMAN'S WORK INC: $556,000 over 7y, 37% of budgetROBERTA'S LEGACY: $535,000 over 5y, 43% of budgetLONGMONT MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $275,000 over 6y, 13% of budgetSO ALL MAY EAT INC: $202,500 over 7y, 4.5% of budgetBPS FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWELD FOOD BANK: $170,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetESTES VALLEY LIBRARY FRIENDS AND FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetSTEPPING STONES OF WINDSOR: $120,000 over 6y, 37% of budgetThe St Vrain Historical Society Inc: $29,500 over 3y, 14% of budgetHAVEN OF HOPE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE GARDENS OF SPRING CREEK: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPARENT ENGAGEMENT NETWORK: $3,500 over 1y, 4.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TINY TIM CENTER INC DBA TLC LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE LONGMONT MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LONGMONT UNITED HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds A WOMAN'S WORK INC ↗
  • Who funds ROBERTA'S LEGACY ↗
  • Who funds LONGMONT MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds SO ALL MAY EAT INC ↗
  • Who funds BPS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WELD FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ESTES VALLEY LIBRARY FRIENDS AND FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPPING STONES OF WINDSOR ↗
  • Who funds RAABE FAMILY DENTISTRY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The St Vrain Historical Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds HAVEN OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE GARDENS OF SPRING CREEK ↗
  • Who funds PARENT ENGAGEMENT NETWORK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO25.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Longmont Community Foundation · Horsfall Family Foundation · Community Foundation Boulder County · Mile High United Way Inc · Ray Lanyon Fund · Lynn & Helen N Clark Crt · Anschutz Family Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stewart Family Foundation Inc % James Newcomb funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stewart Family Foundation Inc % James Newcomb. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Stewart Family Foundation Inc % James Newcomb?

    Find your warmest path to Stewart Family Foundation Inc % James Newcomb through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stewart Family Foundation Inc % James Newcomb’s filings →

    More from the funding graph