· Private foundation
Stewart Family Foundation Inc % James Newcomb
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k10 grants · $224k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $237k
- $250k+2 grants · $4.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TLC LEARNING CENTER | $4,020,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE LONGMONT MUESUEM | $658,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION | $186,000 |
| A WOMAN'S WORK | $51,000 |
| ROBERTAS LEGACY | $45,000 |
| SO ALL MAY EAT | $35,000 |
| LONGMONT MEALS ON WHEELS | $25,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE LONGMONT LIBRARY | $20,000 |
| STEPPING STONES OF WINDSOR | $20,000 |
| WELD FOOD BANK | $20,000 |
| SUNSHINE CLUB OF LONGMONT | $20,000 |
| THE INN BETWEEN | $15,000 |
| OUR CENTER OF LONGMONT | $13,500 |
| RAABE FAMILY DENTISTRY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $754k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +109% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TTTINY TIM CENTER INC DBA TLC LEARNING CENTER8× · 2018–2025 · $9.2M · revenue +121% · 53% of their budget
- FOFRIENDS OF THE LONGMONT MUSEUM6× · 2020–2025 · $8.4M · revenue ×21 · 94% of their budget
- UOUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION7× · 2019–2025 · $7.0M · revenue +58%
Funded once
- LULONGMONT UNITED HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $1.0M · revenue -87% · 52% of their budget
- BFBPS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $200k · revenue 0%
- COCITY OF LONGMONT MUSEUMone grant, 2019 · $80k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Foothills Food Bank works to ensure access to quality, nutritious food to community members in need, and deliver services with respect and dignity.
Harvest of hope pantry's mission is to provide healthy supplemental food to boulder families and individuals in need of food assistance within a safe, welcoming and non-judgemental environment.
Our mission is to redistribute nutritious food that might otherwise go to waste to feed people experiencing food, housing, and financial insecurity, while educating local communities about food justice.
Providing information and services to existing and prospective businesses and industries.
Support of county libraries
The mission of meals on wheels is to provide nutritious meals to residents of the community who need and want their services, regardless of age or income.
To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.
The Friends of Mount Evans & Lost Creek Wilderness (FOMELC) is a 501(c)3 charitable organization founded in November 2005. FOMELC is a 100% volunteer non-profit organization. We offer volunteer opportunities for all ages, physical…
The mission of the longs peak hospital foundation exists to advance philanthropic innovation for healthy, extraordinary lives.
Raise funds for A Womans Place Inc. A domestic violance shelter. Through donations, sponsorships and memberships. Also, sponsor a GALA to recognize outstanding community members.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Longmont United Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Raabe Family Dentistry Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TINY TIM CENTER INC DBA TLC LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE LONGMONT MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LONGMONT UNITED HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds A WOMAN'S WORK INC ↗
- Who funds ROBERTA'S LEGACY ↗
- Who funds LONGMONT MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds SO ALL MAY EAT INC ↗
- Who funds BPS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WELD FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds ESTES VALLEY LIBRARY FRIENDS AND FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds STEPPING STONES OF WINDSOR ↗
- Who funds RAABE FAMILY DENTISTRY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The St Vrain Historical Society Inc ↗
- Who funds HAVEN OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE GARDENS OF SPRING CREEK ↗
- Who funds PARENT ENGAGEMENT NETWORK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Longmont Community Foundation · Horsfall Family Foundation · Community Foundation Boulder County · Mile High United Way Inc · Ray Lanyon Fund · Lynn & Helen N Clark Crt · Anschutz Family Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Stewart Family Foundation Inc % James Newcomb funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Stewart Family Foundation Inc % James Newcomb?
Find your warmest path to Stewart Family Foundation Inc % James Newcomb through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.