How much does Stewart Alexander Md Fdn Tr Udeed give?

Stewart Alexander Md Fdn Tr Udeed reported 46 grants totaling $435,610 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 41 and 51 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2024.

What does Stewart Alexander Md Fdn Tr Udeed fund?

By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2025, its largest causes are Human Services (21%), Public Safety & Disaster (17%), Crime & Legal (9%).

Who are Stewart Alexander Md Fdn Tr Udeed's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2021 to FY2025: Franklin County Legal Services ($125k), Shippensburg Produce and Outreach ($108k), Midpenn Legal Services ($90k).

Does Stewart Alexander Md Fdn Tr Udeed fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 16% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does Stewart Alexander Md Fdn Tr Udeed accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.

Which funders back the same organizations as Stewart Alexander Md Fdn Tr Udeed?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Foundation for Enhancing Communities, Carl L and Glenda T Cramer Charitable Foundation, Partnership for Better Health.

Where is Stewart Alexander Md Fdn Tr Udeed based?

Stewart Alexander Md Fdn Tr Udeed is based in PA.

Stewart Alexander Md Fdn Tr Udeed

Stewart Alexander Md Fdn Tr Udeed at a glance

· Private foundation

Stewart Alexander Md Fdn Tr Udeed

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$436k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$30k

Largest

01What it funds

0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Human Services$484kPublic Safety & Disaster$390kCrime & Legal$215kFood & Nutrition$154kArts & Culture$133kEducation$118kYouth Development$110kHealth$97kOther$0

02FY2025 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k29 grants · $173k
$10k–50k17 grants · $263k

$8,000

Median grant

States reached

$8.8M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
SHIPPENSBURG PRODUCE AND OUTREACH	$30,000
FRANKLIN COUNTY LEGAL SERVICES	$30,000
THE SALVATION ARMY	$26,000
SPIRITRUST LUTHERAN HOME CARE	$25,000
YMCA	$21,000
MIDPENN LEGAL SERVICES	$18,000
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF CUMBERLAND	$13,000
BUCHANAN VALLEY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT	$10,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CHAMBERSBURG	$10,000
UNITED WAY OF SHIPPENSBURG AREA	$10,000
THE HARBOR	$10,000
NEW FRANKLIN VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY	$10,000
PLEASANT HALL VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY	$10,000
ANTIETAM HUMANE SOCIETY	$10,000
SHIPPENSBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETY	$10,000

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $94k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$2.1M · 54 repeat orgs$188k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +3% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

54 repeat relationships: 39 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.1M

$152k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%

-5%

Still filing today

67%

25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Public Safety & DisasterYouth DevelopmentEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesAnimalsOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

FC
FRANKLIN COUNTY LEGAL SERVICES
5× · 2021–2025 · $125k · revenue +45%
SP
SHIPPENSBURG PRODUCE AND OUTREACH
5× · 2021–2025 · $108k · revenue +164%
ML
MIDPENN LEGAL SERVICES
5× · 2021–2025 · $90k · revenue +36%

Funded once

IG
Individual grant recipient
one grant, 2021 · $55k
PP
PENNSYLVANIA PARK AND FORESTS
one grant, 2023 · $15k
Y
YMCA
one grant, 2023 · $10k

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Penn Volunteer Fire Department

All volunteer fire department provides fire and rescue services to the surrounding communities.

—

Penryn Fire Company 1 Inc

Volunteer fire company

Public Safety & Disaster

Schuylkill County Volunteer Firemens Association of the State

To improve volunteer fire service in Schuylkill County

—

Frazeysburg Volunteer Fire Department Inc

Provide emergency medical services and fire runs Training of volunteer EMS and fire personnel maintenance and repair of equipment.

Public Safety & Disaster

Fleetwood Fire Company

Protection of property and lives in Fleetwood, Pennsylvania

Public Safety & Disaster

New WIlmington Volunteer Firemens Assoc Co John Geidner

To provide Fire Protection and Emergency Services to the Community

Public Safety & Disaster

North Penn Volunteer Fire Company

To provide protection and emergency medical services to residents of north wales borough, lower gwynedd township, upper gwynedd township and surrounding communities.

—

Lower Burrell Vol Fire #3

To provide fire and ambulance (and other emergency support) for emergency calls for the City of Lower Burrell, PA which has approximately 14,000 residents.

—

Stewartsville Chamblissburg Vfc Inc

We are a volunteer fire company and EMS service to our community. Founded in 1959, our organizations serves over 4,000 homes.

—

Mt Penn Fire Company

Volunteer fire fighting

Public Safety & Disaster

Hartsville Volunteer Fire Co 1

Promote fire safety and provide fire protection.

—

Chippewa Township Vfd

The mission of the Chippewa Township VFD is to provide fire services for Chippewa Township, PA, a township with a population of approximately 9,000 people.

Public Safety & Disaster

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The United Way of the Shippensburg Area; the most unlike its peers is The John H Shook Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

46/46

Grantees still filing

23/46

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$1,440,205Crime & Legal$215,000Food & Nutrition$154,000Public Safety & Disaster$153,483Youth Development$142,980Human Services$94,000Education$92,959

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Foundation for Enhancing CommunitiesPA37× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Foundation for Enhancing Communities · Carl L and Glenda T Cramer Charitable Foundation · Partnership for Better Health · The United Way of the Shippensburg Area · Hosfeld R and M K Memorial Ta · Central Pennsylvania Food Bank · Elmer E Naugle Foundation 001531 · Chambersburg Hospital · Orrstown Bank Foundation Inc 011552 · Pennsylvania Automotive Association Foundation · Firstenergy Foundation · Gilmore-Hoerner Endowment

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stewart Alexander Md Fdn Tr Udeed funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stewart Alexander Md Fdn Tr Udeed. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Stewart Alexander Md Fdn Tr Udeed’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home