· Private foundation
Stewart Alexander Md Fdn Tr Udeed
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k29 grants · $173k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $263k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FRANKLIN COUNTY LEGAL SERVICES | $30,000 |
| SHIPPENSBURG PRODUCE AND OUTREACH | $30,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $26,000 |
| SPIRITRUST LUTHERAN HOME CARE | $25,000 |
| YMCA | $21,000 |
| MIDPENN LEGAL SERVICES | $18,000 |
| DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES OF CUMBERLAND | $13,000 |
| NEW FRANKLIN VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY | $10,000 |
| PLEASANT HALL VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY | $10,000 |
| ANTIETAM HUMANE SOCIETY | $10,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CHAMBERSBURG | $10,000 |
| BOPIC INC | $10,000 |
| BUCHANAN VALLEY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT | $10,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF SHIPPENSBURG AREA | $10,000 |
| SHIPPENSBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $94k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +2% since the first grant, against -5% for the ones you funded once.
54 repeat relationships — 39 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FCFRANKLIN COUNTY LEGAL SERVICES5× · 2021–2025 · $125k · revenue +45%
- SPSHIPPENSBURG PRODUCE AND OUTREACH5× · 2021–2025 · $108k · revenue +164%
- MLMIDPENN LEGAL SERVICES5× · 2021–2025 · $90k · revenue +36%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $55k
- PPPENNSYLVANIA PARK AND FORESTSone grant, 2023 · $15k
- FOFRIENDS OF MEMORIAL PARK POOL INCone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -58%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
All volunteer fire department provides fire and rescue services to the surrounding communities.
Volunteer fire company
To improve volunteer fire service in Schuylkill County
Provide emergency medical services and fire runs Training of volunteer EMS and fire personnel maintenance and repair of equipment.
Protection of property and lives in Fleetwood, Pennsylvania
To provide Fire Protection and Emergency Services to the Community
To provide protection and emergency medical services to residents of north wales borough, lower gwynedd township, upper gwynedd township and surrounding communities.
To provide fire and ambulance (and other emergency support) for emergency calls for the City of Lower Burrell, PA which has approximately 14,000 residents.
We are a volunteer fire company and EMS service to our community. Founded in 1959, our organizations serves over 4,000 homes.
Volunteer fire fighting
Promote fire safety and provide fire protection.
The mission of the Chippewa Township VFD is to provide fire services for Chippewa Township, PA, a township with a population of approximately 9,000 people.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The United Way of the Shippensburg Area and the most unlike its peers is The John H Shook Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 6% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FRANKLIN COUNTY LEGAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SHIPPENSBURG PRODUCE AND OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds MIDPENN LEGAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds THE JOHN H SHOOK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PLEASANT HALL VOLUNTEER FIRE ↗
- Who funds Buchanan Valley Volunteer Fire Dept Inc ↗
- Who funds SHIPPENSBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CHAMBERSBURG AND SHIPPENSBURG INC ↗
- Who funds WAYNESBORO NEW HOPE SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds Fulton County Library Inc ↗
- Who funds Christian Residential Opportunities & Social Services Inc ↗
- Who funds B O P I C INC ↗
- Who funds ANTIETAM HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Fulton County Medical Center ↗
- Who funds CAPITOL THEATRE CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF THE ROSES ↗
- Who funds NEW FRANKLIN VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds Vigilant Hose Company No 1 ↗
- Who funds MEDARDS HOUSE ↗
- Who funds BENDERSVILLE COMMUNITY FIRE CO ↗
- Who funds KATIE'S PLACE OF SHIPPENSBURG INC ↗
- Who funds CHRIST AMONG NEIGHBORS ↗
- Who funds THE UNITED WAY OF THE SHIPPENSBURG AREA ↗
- Who funds BETTER DAYS ANIMAL LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds CUMBERLAND VALLEY BREAST CARE ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds WEST END FIRE & RESCUE COMPANY NO 3 ↗
- Who funds LEAHS LEGACY ↗
- Who funds Cumberland Valley Hose Company No 2 ↗
- Who funds SHIPPENSBURG AREA EMERGENCY SERVICES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Foundation for Enhancing Communities · Carl L and Glenda T Cramer Charitable Foundation · Partnership for Better Health · The United Way of the Shippensburg Area · Hosfeld R and M K Memorial Ta · Central Pennsylvania Food Bank · Elmer E Naugle Foundation 001531 · Chambersburg Hospital · Orrstown Bank Foundation Inc 011552 · Pennsylvania Automotive Association Foundation · Firstenergy Foundation · Gilmore-Hoerner Endowment
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Stewart Alexander Md Fdn Tr Udeed funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.