Skip to content

· Private foundation

Steven Lawrence Kaplan Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$927k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$502kHealth$300kInternational$59kPhilanthropy$45kReligion$32kHuman Services$23kCrime & Legal$18kArts & Culture$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $136k
  • $250k+2 grants · $750k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF HOPE$500,000
THE TGEN FOUNDATION$250,000
STAND WITH US$45,000
FIDF$45,000
Individual grant recipient$18,000
CHABAD OF SCOTTSDALE ARIZONA$18,000
FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH$10,000
ST MARY'S FOOD BANK$7,000
CHILDHELP$7,000
ROHR CHABAD AT ASU$5,000
SOJOURNER CENTER$5,000
HILLEL OF SAN DIEGO$3,600
MOISHE HOUSE$3,600
CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH FDN OF SO CAL$3,000
ASU FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHILDHELP: $7k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $750 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OR
NV
CA
VA
AZ
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of Steven Lawrence Kaplan Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 63% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 0%.

Steven Lawrence Kaplan Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$949k · 29 repeat orgs$140k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
16

Total granted

$949k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+30%

Still filing today

34%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $126k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IE
    ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE
    5× · 2017–2024 · $59k · revenue +122%
  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    2× · 2017–2018 · $7k · revenue +63%
  • HH
    HAMBURGER HOME
    4× · 2017–2020 · $5k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • WB
    WATER BUFFALO CLUB INC DBA WE BENEFIT CHILDRENgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue +58%
  • KS
    KLAMATH SKY LAKES MEDICAL CENTER FDTN
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • CR
    CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue -7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Arizona Animal Welfare League

The mission of aawl/spca is to provide excellent care, protection, and loving compassion for the life of the animals entrusted to us and to take a leadership role in promoting humane values for the benefit of all animals and people. aawl…

Animals
2
The Haron Dahan Fund for Bar-Ilan University in Israel

The fund's primary exempt mission is to solicit grants and contributions to support the educational mission of the bar-ilan university's azrieli faculty of medicine in the galilee.

Education
3
Alternatives Research and Development Foundation

The mission of the ardf is to fund and promote the development, validation and adoption of non-animal methods in biomedical research, product testing, and education.

Animals
4
Bikur Cholim

Bikur cholim organizes and subsidizes medical treatment, speech and physical therapy, medication, durable medical equipment, blood products, homecare, transportation, housing for patients and family-members, meals, and diagnostics while…

Health
5
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
6
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
7
Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…

Philanthropy
8
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
9
Animal Cancer Foundation

Animal cancer foundation is dedicated to finding new treatments and eventual cures for cancer by funding research in and increasing public awareness of comparative oncology, the study of naturally occurring, similar cancers in people and…

Health
10
The Arizona Pet Project

The arizona pet project creates systemic change and provides resources, so no families are forced to balance their own basic needs of food, shelter, and safety and the needs of their companion animals, often the only meaningful connection…

Animals
11
Usc Arcadia Hospital Foundation

Mission statement the mission of usc arcadia hospital foundation educates and inspires the community to generously support quality medical care at usc arcadia hospital.

Health
12
The Dons of Arizona
Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sojourner Center; the most unlike its peers is California Highway Patrol. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
16/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF HOPE: $500,300 · OtherCITY OF HOPETHE TGEN FOUNDATION: $275,000 · OtherTHE TGEN FOUNDATIONFIDF: $45,000 · OtherTGEN: $35,000 · Other+38 more: $121,630 · Other+38 moreISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $59,000 · InternationalCHILDHELP INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesSOJOURNER CENTER: $5,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,750 · Human Services+1 more: $12 · Human ServicesHAMBURGER HOME: $5,000 · EducationBHHS ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $3,400 · EducationARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHE AMANDA FOUNDATION: $4,250 · AnimalsBEAGLE FREEDOM PROJECT: $1,350 · AnimalsARIZONA BEAGLE RESCUE: $1,350 · AnimalsLuv of dogz fund: $1,200 · AnimalsLOVEPUP FOUNDATION: $1,100 · AnimalsCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $6,925 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $1,000 · Health+1 more: $150 · Health
Other$976,930International$59,000Human Services$14,762Education$10,400Arts & Culture$10,000Animals$9,250Health$8,075

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $59,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDHELP INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $6,925 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL OF SAN DIEGO: $5,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOJOURNER CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAMBURGER HOME: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMANDA FOUNDATION: $4,250 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMOISHE HOUSE: $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWATER BUFFALO CLUB INC DBA WE BENEFIT CHILDREN: $3,520 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBHHS ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $3,400 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBEAGLE FREEDOM PROJECT: $1,350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA BEAGLE RESCUE: $1,350 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetLOVEPUP FOUNDATION: $1,100 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA BASEBALL FOUNDATION: $600 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCONCERN FOUNDATION: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR CAMP BOB WALDORF: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPacific Palisades Womans Club: $110 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDEL REY YACHT CLUB: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION: $12 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDHELP INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds SOJOURNER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HAMBURGER HOME ↗
  • Who funds THE AMANDA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MOISHE HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds WATER BUFFALO CLUB INC DBA WE BENEFIT CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds BHHS ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL ↗
  • Who funds BEAGLE FREEDOM PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA BEAGLE RESCUE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

A R K a Family FoundationCA24.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: A R K a Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · California Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Steven Lawrence Kaplan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Steven Lawrence Kaplan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Steven Lawrence Kaplan Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Steven Lawrence Kaplan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Steven Lawrence Kaplan’s filings →

More from the funding graph