Skip to content

· Private foundation

Steven A Melman Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$202k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$340kHuman Services$130kHealth$128kInternational$108kAnimals$78kEducation$45kScience & Tech$29kArts & Culture$12kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $62k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$2,250
Median grant
8
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
G Sachs Philanthropy fund$100,000
Admirals Cove Foundation$25,000
Morgan Pressel Fdn$17,040
Tuskegee Colege Vet Medicine$10,000
American Veterinary Med Fdn$10,000
National Jewish Health$6,500
University of Miami Health$5,000
Helping Israel Fund$5,000
Birth Right Israel$4,500
Israel Tennis & Education Center$2,500
American Jewish Commitee$2,500
Boca Raton Regional Hosp$2,250
Individual grant recipient$2,000
JAFCO$1,800
Play for Pink$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Hands on Tzedakah: $5k → 11%Hands on Tzedakah: $3k → 11%Hands on Tzedakah: $2k → 11%Hands on Tzedakah: $2k → 11%Levis JCC: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
CO
MD
DC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$824k · 31 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +47% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
9

Total granted

$824k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+47%

Still filing today

32%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesReligionAnimalsCrime & LegalPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MP
    Morgan Pressel Foundation Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $29k · revenue +22%
  • HI
    Helping Israel Fund
    5× · 2020–2024 · $23k · revenue +155%
  • AV
    AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $15k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • UO
    University of Illinois
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • PI
    PEF Israel Endowment fd
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • AR
    ADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
2
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
3
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
4
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
5
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
6
Physicians for Palestine
Health
7
Kenneth & Nira Abramowitz Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Ari and Esther Munk Family Foundation
Philanthropy
9
The Goldenberg Family Foundation
Philanthropy
10
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
11
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
12
Jewish War Veterans of the Usa National Memorial Inc

The mission of the Jewish War Veterans of the USA National Memorial, Inc., doing business as the National Museum of American Jewish Military History, is to preserve, interpret, and share the history of Jewish Americans who have served in…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Jewish Committee; the most unlike its peers is Morgan Pressel Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

G Sachs Philanthropy fund: $315,000 · OtherG Sachs Philanthropy fundJewish Federation: $106,720 · OtherJewish FederationAmerican Friends Magen David: $52,050 · OtherAmerican Friends Magen DavidIsrael Cancer Association: $38,275 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherWestern Univ of Health Sci: $30,000 · Other+28 more: $167,261 · Other+28 moreMorgan Pressel Foundation Inc: $28,715 · HealthBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc: $13,300 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $10,700 · HealthLYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $3,600 · Health+2 more: $850 · HealthADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyHelping Israel Fund: $23,400 · ReligionAMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $15,000 · AnimalsHANDS ON TZEDAKAH INC: $11,900 · Human ServicesADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $2,460 · Human ServicesJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $11,800 · International
Other$744,306Health$57,165Philanthropy$25,000Religion$23,400Animals$15,000Human Services$14,360International$11,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMorgan Pressel Foundation Inc: $28,715 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHelping Israel Fund: $23,400 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc: $13,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHANDS ON TZEDAKAH INC: $11,900 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $11,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $10,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC: $5,670 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $4,150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $3,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $2,460 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVets Helping Heroes Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN OF TOMORROW MENTOR AND SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM INC: $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetActive Minds Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Morgan Pressel Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Helping Israel Fund ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Boca Raton Regional Hospital Inc ↗
  • Who funds HANDS ON TZEDAKAH INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds PLAY FOR PINK INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Vets Helping Heroes Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lynne and Howard Halpern Family Foundation IncFL15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lynne and Howard Halpern Family Foundation Inc · Raymond Zimmerman Family Foundation · The Billi Marcus Foundation Inc · The Anikstein Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Steven A Melman Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Steven A Melman Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Steven A Melman Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Steven A Melman Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Steven A Melman’s filings →

More from the funding graph