Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stephen and Christy King Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$3.6MHuman Services$889kReligion$493kYouth Development$240kInternational$185kArts & Culture$165kHealth$141kEmployment$100kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $181k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $409k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.1M
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$6.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIG SHOULDERS FUND$400,000
ARCHDIOCESE OF CHICAGO$400,000
CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGHSCHOOL$250,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$150,000
BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE$100,000
CHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY$59,000
DANNY DID FOUNDATION$50,000
OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL$50,000
THE FIREHOUSE$35,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO$25,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$25,000
THE ACADEMY AT ST JO AN OF$20,000
U-GO$16,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CARE FOR FRIENDS: $2k → 14%INVEST FOR KIDS: $5k → 14%CAWC: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IN
PA
CA
MD
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.8M · 15 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +127% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
33

Total granted

$4.8M
$655k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+127%
+8%

Still filing today

40%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $772k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesInternationalCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    Big Shoulders Fund
    8× · 2017–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +67%
  • University of Illinois Foundation
    3× · 2017–2023 · $223k · revenue +127%
  • HI
    HOPE IGNITES CHICAGO
    4× · 2022–2025 · $215k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • CC
    Chicago Cred Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -1%
  • OI
    OPPORTUNITY INC
    one grant, 2018 · $55k · revenue -66%
  • NC
    NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue ×103 · 89% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Chicago Innovation Foundation
Philanthropy
2
True Chicago
Arts & Culture
3
Students Run Chicago
Health
4
Endeavor Health Clinical Operations

Endeavor Health Clinical Operations follows the mission of Endeavor Health to "help everyone in our communities be their best."

Health
5
Illinois Children's Healthcare Foundation
Human Services
6
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
7
Stanley Manne Childrens Research Institute

Stanley manne children's research institute strives to generate new knowledge and advance the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of pediatric diseases.

Health
8
Children's Hospital of Chicago Medical Center

We are dedicated to the health and well-being of all children. as the pediatric teaching facility for the northwestern university feinberg school of medicine, this commitment drives us to be a leader in: -pediatric health care delivery…

Health
9
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
10
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
11
Covenant House Chicago
—
12
Childrens Hospital of Illinois Medical Group

To support the mission of osf healthcare system, a catholic integrated health care delivery system, through the provision of quality health care services related to comprehensive inpatient and outpatient care for children.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Shoulders Fund; the most unlike its peers is Chicago Cred Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $806,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES INCLOYOLA ACADEMY: $500,000 · OtherLOYOLA ACADEMYARCHDIOCESE OF CHICAGO: $400,000 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF CHICAGOUNIVERSITY OF IL: $350,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ILCENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $250,000 · OtherCENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOLHOPE IGNITES CHICAGO: $215,000 · OtherHOPE IGNITES CHICAGOIndividual grant recipient: $130,500 · OtherTHE FIREHOUSE: $130,000 · Other+35 more: $626,000 · Other+35 moreBig Shoulders Fund: $1,969,604 · EducationBig Shoulders FundUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $223,000 · EducationUniversity of Illinois FoundationTHE ACADEMY AT ST JOAN OF ARC: $145,000 · EducationTHE ACADEMY AT ST JOAN OF ARC+2 more: $55,000 · EducationOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $105,000 · InternationalOPPORTUNITY INC: $55,000 · InternationalChicago Cred Inc: $100,000 · EmploymentDANNY DID FOUNDATION: $51,000 · HealthAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $25,000 · HealthSOLIDARITY BRIDGE INC: $13,500 · HealthNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyCONNECTIONS FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND THEIR CHILDREN: $25,000 · Human ServicesInvest for Kids Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesCARE FOR FRIENDS: $2,000 · Human Services
Other$3,407,500Education$2,392,604International$160,000Employment$100,000Health$89,500Philanthropy$50,000Human Services$32,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBig Shoulders Fund: $1,969,604 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $223,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE IGNITES CHICAGO: $215,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetTHE ACADEMY AT ST JOAN OF ARC: $145,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $105,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetChicago Cred Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOPPORTUNITY INC: $55,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetDANNY DID FOUNDATION: $51,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 89% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTART EARLY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTIONS FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND THEIR CHILDREN: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOLIDARITY BRIDGE INC: $13,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGOLDEN APPLE FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCenter for Independence through Conductive Education Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMETROPOLITAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLOVERDALE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetCARE FOR FRIENDS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Big Shoulders Fund ↗
  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HOPE IGNITES CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds THE ACADEMY AT ST JOAN OF ARC ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Cred Inc ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds DANNY DID FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds START EARLY ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTIONS FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND THEIR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds WORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds SOLIDARITY BRIDGE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL23× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Robert R McCormick Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Fifth Third Chicagoland Foundation · Helen V Brach Foundation · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Greater Chicago Food Depository · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · AbbVie Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stephen and Christy King Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stephen and Christy King Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Stephen and Christy King Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Stephen and Christy King Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stephen and Christy King Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph