Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stephen and Carol Canter Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$62k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$199kYouth Development$68kArts & Culture$62kEmployment$40kHuman Services$19kInternational$11kHousing & Shelter$9kRecreation & Sports$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$864k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEIGHTS PHILADELPHIA$15,000
STREET SQUASH$7,500
SQUASH BRIDGE$7,500
ST JEAN BAPTISTE HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
BOSTON LATIN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION$5,000
GLEN COVE BOYS GIRLS CLUB$5,000
BUCKLEY COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL$5,000
BRIDGEPORT PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND IN$5,000
NEW BEGINNINGS FAMILY ACADEMY$3,000
PLANTING FIELDS FOUNDATION$2,000
ASSIST$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE RIVER FUND: $4k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$392k · 15 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
6

Total granted

$392k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+47%

Still filing today

60%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyInternationalHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BL
    BOSTON LATIN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $46k · revenue +27%
  • SS
    STEPPINGSTONE SCHOLARS INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $45k · revenue +37%
  • T5
    THE 52ND STREET PROJECT INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $43k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SEED FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -8%
  • WI
    WELLNESS IN THE SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • TR
    THE RIVER FUND NEW YORK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue +113%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
School in the Square Public Charter School

School in the square ("s2") engages, educates and empowers adolescents to respond mindfully and creatively to life's opportunities and challenges. s2 is a place where students, families and educators are seen, heard, and inspired and where…

Education
2
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
3
Robert Louis Stevenson School

The robert louis stevenson school's mission is to provide a college preparatory program for bright adolescents who have not reached their potential in more traditional school settings. the program provides every student individually…

Education
4
Bronx Charter School for Excellence

Excellence community schools prepares young people in new york city and stamford to compete for admission to and succeed in top public, private and parochial high schools by cultivating their intellectual, artistic, social, emotional, and…

Education
5
Cold Spring School Inc

Cold spring school challenges children to become self-reliant, curious and resourceful problem solvers with the academic and social skills to engage constructively and ethically in our diverse, changing world.

Education
6
Luria Academy of Brooklyn

Luria academy is a child-centered environment dedicated to academic excellence and a sophisticated knowledge of jewish text and jewish heritage. located in the prospect heights neighborhood of brookly, luria academy is a jewish…

Education
7
Brooklyn Free School Association

Brooklyn Free School's (BFS's) mission is education for social justice. Always advocating for young people's voices to be heard, BFS engages students and staff in democratic decision-making and problem solving. We honor student choice and…

—
8
Boston After School & Beyond Inc

Boston after school & beyond, inc. is a public private partnership that pursues a unified after-school and summer learning system that promotes stakeholder alignment, a focus on results, and access to learning opportunities, particularly…

Education
9
Advocates for Academic Excellence in Education Inc

The school's mission is to prepare students of high academic achievement to succeed. the school provides student instruction and activity programs.

Education
10
International School of Brooklyn

We develop adventurers. (see schedule o)creative collaborators and intellectual risk takers who are inspired to think critically and seek answers. we create passionate communicators actively connected to their community and the world. we…

Education
11
Darrow School

Darrow school is dedicated to serving students with diverse backgrounds and abilities, building on each student's talents and interests to inspire enduring confidence for success in college and life. this mission is accomplished through…

Education
12
Spruce Street School

Spruce Street School is a nurturing educational community that instills in a broad range of children the social, emotional, and intellectual skills for lifelong participation in a diverse society. We offer kindergarten through fifth grade…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bridgeport Public Education Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Change for Kids Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STEPPINGSTONE SCHOLARS INC: $45,000 · OtherSTEPPINGSTONE SCHOLARS INCCHANGE FOR KIDS NEW YORK CITY: $21,500 · OtherCHANGE FOR KIDS NEW YORK CITYPA ACADEMY OF FINE ARTS: $19,000 · OtherPA ACADEMY OF FINE ARTSHORIZONS NATIONAL: $17,000 · OtherHORIZONS NATIONALDON BOSCO COMMUNITY CENTER PORTCHES: $15,000 · OtherDON BOSCO COMMUNITY CENTER PORTCHESSAVE THE CHILDREN: $10,500 · OtherSAVE THE CHILDRENCORNERSTONE SCHOOLS OF WASHINGTON D: $10,000 · OtherCORNERSTONE SCHOOLS OF WASHINGTON D+7 more: $27,100 · Other+7 moreBOSTON LATIN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $46,000 · EducationBOSTON LATIN SCHOOL ASSOCIATIO…HEIGHTS PHILADELPHIA: $40,000 · EducationHEIGHTS PHILADELPHIABUCKLEY COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $13,500 · EducationBUCKLEY COUNTRY DAY SCHOOLSQUASHBRIDGE INC: $7,500 · EducationSQUASHBRIDGE INCTHE SEED FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Education+2 more: $5,000 · EducationTHE 52ND STREET PROJECT INC: $42,500 · Arts & CultureTHE 52ND ST…STREETSQUASH INC: $41,000 · Recreation & SportsSTREETSQUA…BRIDGEPORT PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND INC: $37,000 · PhilanthropyBRIDGEPOR…AMERICAN SECONDARY SCHOOLS FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS AND TEACHERS INC: $25,000 · InternationalLIFTING UP WESTCHESTER INC: $9,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$165,100Education$117,000Arts & Culture$42,500Recreation & Sports$41,000Philanthropy$37,000International$25,000Housing & Shelter$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOSTON LATIN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $46,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPPINGSTONE SCHOLARS INC: $45,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE 52ND STREET PROJECT INC: $42,500 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetSTREETSQUASH INC: $41,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHEIGHTS PHILADELPHIA: $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBRIDGEPORT PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND INC: $37,000 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetAMERICAN SECONDARY SCHOOLS FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS AND TEACHERS INC: $25,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBUCKLEY COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $13,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLIFTING UP WESTCHESTER INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SEED FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE RIVER FUND NEW YORK INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWELLNESS IN THE SCHOOLS INC: $3,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW BEGINNINGS FAMILY ACADEMY INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHANGE FOR KIDS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSUFFIELD ACADEMY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOSTON LATIN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds STEPPINGSTONE SCHOLARS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE 52ND STREET PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds STREETSQUASH INC ↗
  • Who funds HEIGHTS PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGEPORT PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SECONDARY SCHOOLS FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS AND TEACHERS INC ↗
  • Who funds BUCKLEY COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds LIFTING UP WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SQUASHBRIDGE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SEED FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE RIVER FUND NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds WELLNESS IN THE SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW BEGINNINGS FAMILY ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHANGE FOR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds SUFFIELD ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds PLANTING FIELDS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA14.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stephen and Carol Canter Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stephen and Carol Canter Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stephen and Carol Canter Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph