Skip to content

· Private foundation

Steiner Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$421k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$456kHuman Services$441kReligion$295kArts & Culture$271kEnvironment$160kEducation$84kYouth Development$20kFood & Nutrition$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $47k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $325k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST STEPHENS CHURCH$100,000
UNITED WAY$100,000
COLLAT FAMILY SERVICES$75,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
BIRMINGHAM MUSEUM OF ART$25,100
Individual grant recipient$12,000
RED MOUNTAIN THEATRE$10,000
CAHABA RIVER SOCIETY$6,000
CONGREGATION EMANU-EL$5,250
Individual grant recipient$5,000
FRIENDS OF BIRMINGHAM BOTANICAL GARDENS$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CLIFF VALLEY SCHOOL$5,000
HIGHLANDS SCHOOL$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,685
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YMCA: $5k → 16%YMCA: $4k → 16%YMCA: $4k → 16%YMCA: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 20 repeat orgs$138k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against -28% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
8

Total granted

$1.6M
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
-28%

Still filing today

40%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $111k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $456k · revenue +21%
  • IS
    INDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL
    2× · 2022–2023 · $50k · revenue +17%
  • CR
    Cahaba River Society Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $32k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • BL
    BIRMINGHAM LANDMARKS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -28%
  • RC
    RED CROSS
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • VP
    VULCAN PARK MUSEUM
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alabama Bankers Association Inc

To promote the preservation and continued development of commercial banking in alabama.

—
2
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment
3
Birmingham Association of Realtors Inc

To promote the value of using a realtor and to enhance our members' opportunities to serve customers in a professional, ethical and profitable manner within an environment that fosters cooperation among the membership.

Community Improvement
4
Alabama Rivers Alliance Inc

Alabama Rivers Alliance is a statewide network of groups working to protect and restore all of Alabama's water resources through building partnerships, empowering citizens, and advocating for sound water policy and its enforcement.

Environment
5
Red River Zoological Society

As conservation leaders, the red river zoo connects our community to nature and inspires people to help save species.

Animals
6
Alabama Educational Foundation & Indian Springs School a Corp

Guided by our motto, learning through living, indian springs school fosters a love of learning and creativity, a sense of integrity and moral courage, and an ethic of participatory citizenship with respect for individuality and independent…

Education
7
Amazon Conservation Association

Amazon conservation unites science, people, and innovation to protect the amazon - the greatest wild forest on earth. as guardians of the most iconic forest on the planet, we bring together the power of the latest science and technology…

Environment
8
Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences

Inspire joyful exploration of science and nature through engaging experiences, unique resources, and exceptional staff.

Arts & Culture
9
Nashville Zoo Inc

In fulfillment of our mission to inspire a culture of understanding and discovery of our natural world through conservation, innovation and leadership, our goal is to build a first class zoo for middle tennessee and to develop a facility…

Animals
10
Crestwood Day School Inc

Crestwood day school is a private elementary (k-6th) grade school in alabama.

Education
11
Gulf Stream School Inc

Education of grades pre-school through eighth grade.

Education
12
Chattahoochee Hills Charter School Inc

The mission of the charter school is to inspire all their children to the highest levels of academic achievement through a rigorous curriculum that integrates the wonders of the natural world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Birmingham Botanical Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Nature Conservancy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLLAT FAMILY SERVICES: $425,000 · OtherCOLLAT FAMILY SERVICESCONGREGATION EMANU-EL: $167,850 · OtherCONGREGATION EMANU-ELBIRMINGHAM MUSEUM OF ART: $153,300 · OtherBIRMINGHAM MUSEUM OF ARTST STEPHENS CHURCH: $100,000 · OtherST STEPHENS CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $46,000 · Other+21 more: $181,485 · Other+21 moreUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $456,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA…INDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL: $50,000 · EducationCahaba River Society Inc: $32,000 · Community ImprovementYMCA: $16,000 · Human ServicesTHE BIRMINGHAM BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $15,750 · EnvironmentBIRMINGHAM LANDMARKS INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureBirmingham Historical Society: $500 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,173,635Philanthropy$456,000Education$50,000Community Improvement$32,000Human Services$16,000Environment$15,750Arts & Culture$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $456,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetINDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL: $50,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCahaba River Society Inc: $32,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetHIGHLANDS DAY SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $18,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYMCA: $16,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE BIRMINGHAM BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $15,750 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCliff Valley School Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIRMINGHAM LANDMARKS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetA G GASTON BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVULCAN PARK FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Cahaba River Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLANDS DAY SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YMCA ↗
  • Who funds THE BIRMINGHAM BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Cliff Valley School Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds BIRMINGHAM LANDMARKS INC ↗
  • Who funds A G GASTON BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds VULCAN PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Birmingham Historical Society ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Greater BirminghamAL21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Mike and Gillian Goodrich Foundation · Susan Mott Webb Charitable Trust · Protective Life Foundation · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Jones Family Fund · Dunn-French Foundation · Hill Crest Foundation Inc · Altecstyslinger Foundation · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · McWane Foundation · The Hugh Kaul Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Steiner Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Steiner Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Steiner’s filings →

    More from the funding graph