Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Barrie and Deedee Wigmore Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
56
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$1.3M
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$5.2MArts & Culture$3.3MRecreation & Sports$2.0MHealth$667kPhilanthropy$407kEnvironment$209kHuman Services$159kAnimals$127kOther$0
02FY2025 · 56 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k35 grants · $93k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $138k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $926k
  • $250k+4 grants · $3.7M
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART$1,253,500
CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC$1,000,000
WORCESTER COLLEGE OXFORD ENDOWMENT TRUST$849,032
UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD DEVELOPMENT FUND$636,847
WORCESTER COLLEGE OXFORD$176,351
ADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$100,000
OXUF INC$100,000
THE JOAN AND SANFORD WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE$100,000
BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS & SCIENCE DBA BROOKLYN MUSEUM$100,000
NORTH COUNTRY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$100,000
ADIRONDACK FOUNDATION$100,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$100,000
SARANAC LAKE CIVIC CENTER INC$50,000
SASK FESTIVAL OF WORDS$35,313
PAUL SMITH COLLEGE$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

Your US giving — 77% of grant dollars ($15M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 23% that went abroad ($4.6M) is mapped below.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%INTERNET ARCHIVE: $1k → 10%HIGH PEAKS HOSPICE: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
DE
DC
FL

Beyond the US — 23% of all-years giving ($4.6M)

4 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$4.4M · 17 grants
Slovakia$118k · 6 grants
Canada$83k · 42 grants
Netherlands$3k · 1 grant

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9.6M · 45 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

45 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
44

Total granted

$9.6M
$935k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+74%

Still filing today

49%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationFood & NutritionHealthPhilanthropyAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
    4× · 2022–2025 · $2.7M · revenue +39%
  • CP
    CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +17%
  • NY
    New York University
    4× · 2022–2025 · $355k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • NL
    NYU LANGONE HOSPITALS
    one grant, 2024 · $200k · revenue 0%
  • NB
    NY BOTANICAL GARDEN
    one grant, 2022 · $200k
  • AH
    ADIRONDACK HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
2
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
3
The Long Island Museum of American Art History & Carriages

The long island museum is dedicated to inspiring people of all ages with an understanding and enjoyment of american art, history and carriages as expressed through the heritage of long island and its diverse communities.

Arts & Culture
4
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
5
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
6
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
7
The Trustees of the New York Society Library

The new york society library was founded in 1754 by the new york society, a civic-minded group formed in the belief that the availability of books would help the city of new york to prosper.

8
Innisfree Foundation Inc
9
The Newark Museum Association

Nmoa mission statement is: we welcome everyone with inclusive experiences that spark curiosity and foster community.

Arts & Culture
10
Historical Society of Saratoga Springs

Preservation & maintenance collection

11
Staten Island Institute of Arts and Sciences dba the Staten Island Museum

Founded in 1881 the Staten Island Museum engages visitors with interdisciplinary exhibitions, public programs, and educational activities for all ages. It is the mission of the Staten Island Museum to spark curiosity and generate…

Arts & Culture
12
New York Public Radio

To make the mind more curious, the heart more open, and the spirit more joyful through excellent audio programming that is deeply rooted in new york.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Adirondack Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Internet Archive. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr15%5%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr18%32%20–35yr12%30%35–55yr13%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr18%54%20–35yr12%39%35–55yr13%5%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/46
the rest of the field
14%
11,291/82,783

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 115 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/42
Grantees still filing
27/42
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WORCESTER COLLEGE DEVELOPMENT FUND — $2,082,932 · OtherWORCESTER COLLEGE DEVELOPMENT FUNDUNIVERSITY OF OXFORD DEVELOPMENT FUND — $1,250,244 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF OXFORD DEVELOPMENT FUNDWORCESTER COLLEGE OXFORD ENDOWMENT TRUST — $849,032 · OtherWORCESTER COLLEGE OXFORD ENDOWMENT TRUST+87 more — $1,818,356 · Other+87 moreMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $2,731,023 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART+10 more — $305,336 · Arts & Culture+10 moreCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $1,500,000 · Recreation & SportsCENTRAL PARK …ADIRONDACK FOUNDATION — $400,000 · PhilanthropyADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $200,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $6,500 · PhilanthropyNew York University — $355,000 · EducationOXUF INC — $100,000 · EducationSARANAC LAKE FREE LIBRARY — $40,000 · EducationPAUL SMITHS COLLEGE — $25,000 · Education+3 more — $15,000 · EducationSARANAC LAKE CIVIC CENTER INC — $410,000 · Community ImprovementNYU LANGONE HOSPITALS — $200,000 · HealthVISITING NURSE SERVICE OF NEW YORK — $40,000 · Health
Other$6,000,564Arts & Culture$3,036,359Recreation & Sports$1,500,000Philanthropy$606,500Education$535,000Community Improvement$410,000Health$240,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $2,731,023 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $1,500,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSARANAC LAKE CIVIC CENTER INC — $410,000 over 3y, 9.6% of budgetADIRONDACK FOUNDATION — $400,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetNew York University — $355,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNYU LANGONE HOSPITALS — $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetNORTH COUNTRY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $110,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetTRI LAKES HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $102,000 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetTHE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNUCLEAR THREAT INITIATIVE INC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSHELBURNE MUSEUM INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetVERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSARANAC LAKE FREE LIBRARY — $40,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetVISITING NURSE SERVICE OF NEW YORK — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS COLE HISTORIC HOUSE — $32,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetHISTORIC SARANAC LAKE — $30,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetPAUL SMITHS COLLEGE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNew York Historical Society — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSARANAC LAKE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT — $15,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetBIDEAWEE INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SYMPHONY SPACE INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSARANAC LAKE VOLUNTARY HEALTH ASSOCIATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetSARANAC LAKE VOLUNTEER RESCUE SQUAD — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY COMMUNITY SOCIAL SERVICES INC — $10,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetRIVERSIDE PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DOE FUND INC — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSARANAC LAKE ROTARY FOUNDATION INC — $6,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetDECORATIVE ARTS SOCIETY INC — $6,336 over 1y, 21% of budgetTHE ADIRONDACK CAROUSEL INC — $6,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetNEW WEST CHARTER SCHOOL — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE STREET FOOD PANTRY INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHIGH PEAKS HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE IN — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWestwood Greenway Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSCHOOL ON WHEELS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cloudsplitter FoundationNY26.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cloudsplitter Foundation · Staritch Foundation Inc · Adirondack Foundation · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · Charles R Wood Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Barrie and Deedee Wigmore Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 9%
  • Shelburne Museum Inc9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Barrie and Deedee Wigmore Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Barrie and Deedee Wigmore Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 115 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph