· Private foundation
Stanley Marion Paul and Edward Bergman Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $283k
- $50k–250k11 grants · $967k
- $250k+2 grants · $605k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NYU LANGONE HOSPITALS | $334,679 |
| AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE | $270,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND FUND INC | $160,000 |
| MIRACLE CORNERS OF THE WORLD INC | $159,000 |
| THE GREY FOUNDATION AMERICAS INC | $150,000 |
| AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE | $100,000 |
| NEW YORK UNIVERSITY | $90,000 |
| FORDHAM UNIVERSITY | $52,500 |
| SHARED INTEREST | $52,500 |
| METROPOLITAN OPERA ASSOCIATION | $52,500 |
| NATIONAL YIDDISH THEATRE FOLKSBIENE | $50,000 |
| THE SYNERGOS INSTITUTE INC | $50,000 |
| TEMPLE ISRAEL CENTER | $50,000 |
| WILLS EYE FOUNDATION | $40,000 |
| THE ABRAHAM JOSHUA HESCHEL SCHOOL | $36,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $49k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
64 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2025, 38 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $193k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE7× · 2019–2025 · $703k · revenue +39%- NLNYU LANGONE HOSPITALS3× · 2021–2025 · $569k · revenue +31%
- IPISRAEL POLICY FORUM INC7× · 2017–2024 · $390k · revenue +157%
Funded once
- HFHIDDUSH - FREEDOM OF RELIGION FOR ISRAELone grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue -35%
- TMTHE METROPOLITAN OPERAone grant, 2018 · $49k
- GCGUIDANCE CENTER OF WESTCHESTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +28%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…
The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…
The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.
Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.
The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.
Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…
The museum of jewish heritage - a living memorial to the holocaust is new york's contribution to the global responsibility to never forget. see schedule o for additional information.
Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.
(see schedule o)
The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shared Interest Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cape Verde Jewish Heritage Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
97 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 97 of the 141 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds NYU LANGONE HOSPITALS ↗
- Who funds MIRACLE CORNERS OF THE WORLD INC ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL POLICY FORUM INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds CHORDOMA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Grey Foundation Americas Inc ↗
- Who funds SHARED INTEREST INC ↗
- Who funds THE SYNERGOS INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND FUND INC ↗
- Who funds ABRAHAM JOSHUA HESCHEL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds Fordham University ↗
- Who funds Dental Trade Alliance Foundation ↗
- Who funds Metropolitan Opera Association Inc ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP ↗
- Who funds HIDDUSH - FREEDOM OF RELIGION FOR ISRAEL ↗
- Who funds WILLS EYE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds JAPAN SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds ISLAND HARVEST LTD ↗
- Who funds HENRY SCHEIN CARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NOAH BENARDOUT FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The New York Community Trust · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · American Express Foundation · Weintraub Family Foundation · Ip Foundation · The Mai Family Foundation · The Brodsky Family Foundation · The Gottesman Fund · The Claire Friedlander Family Foundation · The Shepard Broad Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Stanley Marion Paul and Edward Bergman Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
- Brandeis University — 9% of income from government
- Cornerstone Family Programs — 3% of income from government
- Gottesman Rtw Academy — 2% of income from government
- Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.