· Private foundation
Ip Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k60 grants · $84k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YOUNG ISRAEL OF WOODMERE | $15,000 |
| TOMCHEI SHABBOS YAD YESHAYA | $9,500 |
| CHABAD OF THE 5 TOWNS | $6,500 |
| YESHIVA DARCHEI TORAH | $6,260 |
| ACHIEZER | $5,600 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,350 |
| GLOBAL ISRAEL ALLIANCE | $5,000 |
| HALB | $4,300 |
| BNOS BAIS YAAKOV | $3,600 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| YOUNG ISRAEL OF LAWRENCE-CEDARHURST | $2,040 |
| CONG BETH SHALOM RABBI'S CHARITY FUND | $2,000 |
| ONE ISRAEL FUND | $1,900 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,800 |
| LINKS | $1,800 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 23% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
76 repeat relationships — 45 still active in FY2024, 31 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DMDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC8× · 2017–2024 · $31k · revenue +316%
- ACACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC5× · 2017–2024 · $13k · revenue +58%
- AHAVIGDORS HELPING HAND INC5× · 2017–2022 · $6k · revenue +135%
Funded once
- KZKEHILLAS ZICHRON MEIR MOSHEone grant, 2021 · $26k
- HAHEBREW ACADEMY OF LONG BEACHone grant, 2023 · $5k
- HAHEBREW ACADEMY OF LONG ISLANDone grant, 2021 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization provides financial assistance to victims of acts of terrorism in the state of israel.
To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.
To provide medical support to families in need
To provide funds for jewish occasions to help large families in need primarily in israel
To provide financial and other assistance to needy persons and families in Israel
Providing financial assistance to needy individuals as well as to other charitable, educational, and religious organizations in israel and worldwide
To provide financial aid and assistance to the poor, sick & disabled people, and monetary support to needy families in time of need.
Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide educational and social improvement for the children of kiryat arba, israel.
To further jewish education in israel
To assist the sick and elderly by providing financial support for medical expenses, hot meals for the invalid home-bound, patient advocacy and support, new mother convalescence, patient family support, overnight accomodations for visiting…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chasdei Yisroel Inc and the most unlike its peers is Camp Extreme D/B/a Project Extreme. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 147 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE LEON MAYER FUND INC ↗
- Who funds TOMCHEI SHABBOS-YAD YESHAYA INC ↗
- Who funds ACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds AVIGDORS HELPING HAND INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL ISRAEL ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds USA OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds BNOS BAIS YAAKOV OF FAR ROCKAWAY ↗
- Who funds Sharsheret Inc ↗
- Who funds ONE ISRAEL FUND LTD ↗
- Who funds BIKUR CHOLIM INC ↗
- Who funds KEREN HASHVIIS INC ↗
- Who funds SAMCHAINU INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · F G Foundation · Mzl 40 Foundation · Alyad Foundation Inc · Cross River Community Foundation · Damar Foundation Inc · The Margules Foundation Inc · The Hirsch Family Charitable Foundation Trust · The Ganger Foundation Inc · The Basch Family Foundation · Allen I Gross Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ip Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Sharsheret Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.