Skip to content
Stanley F Goldfein Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Stanley F Goldfein Foundation Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$365k
Granted FY2026still arriving
87
Grants FY2026still arriving
19
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2026.

Health$227kEnvironment$207kCivil Rights$157kEducation$75kArts & Culture$48kCrime & Legal$40kAnimals$17kFood & Nutrition$13kOther$0
02FY2026 · 87 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k71 grants · $91k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $274k
$1,000
Median grant
19
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EARTH JUSTICE$25,000
NRDC$25,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY$25,000
WWF$20,000
EARTHWATCH$20,000
PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION$20,000
NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY$18,000
OCEAN CONSERVANCY$17,000
NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH$16,500
UC DAVIS HEALTH CANCER CENTER$15,000
SUTTER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$15,000
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION$14,300
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$11,000
MAYO CLINIC$11,000
AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH$11,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–26, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 19% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $200 → 7%MAYA HEALTH ALLIANCE: $100 → 9%IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER: $9k → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $200 → 7%IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER: $4k → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $200 → 7%IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER: $500 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $200 → 7%IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER: $500 → 7%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $200 → 7%IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER: $500 → 7%IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER: $300 → 7%CHILDRENS AID: $200 → 17%CHILDREN'S AID: $200 → 17%CHILDRENS AID: $200 → 17%CHILDRENS AID: $200 → 17%CHILDREN'S AID: $200 → 17%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT: $500 → 17%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT: $500 → 17%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT: $500 → 17%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT: $500 → 17%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT: $500 → 17%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT: $200 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
IL
NY
MA
OR
SD
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
NC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$709k · 97 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

97 repeat relationships: 78 still active in FY2026, 19 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

97
37

Total granted

$709k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+16%

Still filing today

63%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthInternationalCivil RightsEnvironmentEducationCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EARTHJUSTICE
    6× · 2021–2026 · $31k · revenue +49%
  • TC
    THE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION
    6× · 2021–2026 · $24k · revenue +84%
  • PC
    PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2026 · $24k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • IL
    IMMIGRANT LEGAL ADVOCACY PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $5k · revenue +145%
  • NI
    NATIONAL IMMIGRANT JUSTICE CENTER
    one grant, 2025 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
3
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
4
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
5
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
6
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
7
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
8
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
9
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
10
Climate Institute

The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…

Environment
11
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
12
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Immigration Law Center; the most unlike its peers is American Museum of Natural History. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

84 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 84 of the 143 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
83/84
Grantees still filing
50/84
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $45,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $40,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODNRDC: $31,000 · OtherNRDCWWF: $25,000 · OtherEARTHWATCH: $25,000 · OtherACLU: $24,000 · OtherNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $22,000 · Other+91 more: $273,610 · Other+91 moreAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $40,600 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CI…COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC: $14,500 · Civil RightsCOMMITTEE T…NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER: $14,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL IM…THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $7,200 · Civil RightsTHE CENTER …ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $6,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMA…+3 more: $4,900 · Civil Rights+3 moreBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $23,000 · EducationBRANDEIS …Nova Southeastern University Inc: $21,000 · EducationNova Sout…THE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $19,500 · EducationTHE UC DA…FAIR FIGHT ACTION INC: $5,500 · EducationFAIR FIGH…+3 more: $2,900 · EducationSUTTER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $19,000 · HealthSUTTER ME…AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $17,000 · HealthAMERICAN …BRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthBRIGHTFOC…American Heart Association Inc: $6,000 · HealthAmerican …WESTMOOR CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · HealthWESTMOOR …Rape Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN): $3,000 · HealthSERIOUSFUN CHILDREN'S NETWORK: $3,000 · Health+8 more: $7,200 · Health+8 moreEARTHJUSTICE: $30,500 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $22,000 · EnvironmentTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $4,250 · Environment+5 more: $4,750 · EnvironmentTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION: $24,000 · Arts & CulturePRO PUBLICA INC: $10,800 · Arts & CultureAmerican Museum of Natural History: $5,250 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $2,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $600 · Arts & CulturePROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $24,000 · PhilanthropyCommunity Foundation for Nantucket Inc: $1,550 · Philanthropy
Other$485,610Civil Rights$87,200Education$71,900Health$70,200Environment$61,500Arts & Culture$42,650Philanthropy$25,550

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $45,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $40,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $30,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION: $24,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $24,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $23,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $22,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNova Southeastern University Inc: $21,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $19,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSUTTER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $19,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $17,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER: $14,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC: $14,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER: $14,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $11,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $10,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $9,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $7,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFAIR FIGHT ACTION INC: $5,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History: $5,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $4,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $3,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPOLARIS PROJECT: $3,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFLORENCE IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE RIGHTS PROJECT INC: $3,150 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRape Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN): $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSERIOUSFUN CHILDREN'S NETWORK: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $2,700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $2,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $2,350 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law: $2,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET BOOK FOUNDATION INC: $1,800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNHA PROPERTIES INC: $1,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $1,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWS UNITED FOR JUSTICE INC: $1,700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Foundation for Nantucket Inc: $1,550 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds THE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Nova Southeastern University Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SUTTER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Silicon Valley Commun…Tides FoundationAbbVie FoundationNetwork for GoodVanguard Charitable E…The Pfizer Foundation…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…National Philanthropi…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation for Nantucket IncMA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stanley F Goldfein Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stanley F Goldfein Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution: 63% of income from government
  • Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Reach Out and Read Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Brandeis University: 9% of income from government
  • Nantucket Dreamland Foundation Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Nova Southeastern University Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Nantucket Book Foundation Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Lawyers for Civil Rights Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 143 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stanley F Goldfein’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home