Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Stanley Consultants Charitable Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$142k
Granted FY2026still arriving
20
Grants FY2026still arriving
13
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2026.

Philanthropy$304kFood & Nutrition$157kCommunity Improvement$117kEducation$107kScience & Tech$100kHuman Services$94kInternational$43kPublic Safety & Disaster$43kOther$0
02FY2026 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k15 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $122k
$2,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Community Foundation of Greater Muscatine$40,000
ACEC Research Instutute$37,000
Muscatine Chamber of Commerce$20,000
United Way of Muscatine$15,000
Junior Achievement of the Heartland$10,000
National Pearl Button Museum$5,744
Disabled American Veterans$2,705
Iowa College Fund$2,250
Community Foundation of Greater Muscatine$2,000
Catholic Charities$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
All Roads Shelter$2,000
Prism$200
Breakthrough T1D$200
The Breast Cancer Research Foundation$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–26, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 48% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $3k → 17%TOUCH MY HEART: $6k → 7%MERCER COUNTY FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $2k → 9%LAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 13%Prism: $200 → 11%SOUTH VALLEY SERVICES: $5k → 8%SWITCHPOINT COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $3k → 10%COMMUNITY CRISIS SERVICES AND FOOD BANK: $3k → 15%SOUTH VALLEY SANCTUARY: $5k → 8%Muscatine Community Y: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
IA
OH
CA
UT
CO
MD
DE
AZ
TN
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$514k · 16 repeat orgs$366k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +15% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2026, 12 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
58

Total granted

$514k
$325k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+5%

Still filing today

69%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23’24’25’26
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SU
    STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $80k · revenue +53%
  • MC
    MUSCATINE CENTER FOR SOCIAL ACTION
    5× · 2019–2025 · $54k · revenue +95%
  • SV
    SOUTH VALLEY SANCTUARY INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $11k · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES
    one grant, 2021 · $36k · revenue +7%
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY CORPS COMMUNITY CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $22k
  • AH
    ACCESS HOUSING OF ADAMS COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +7%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
2
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
3
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
4
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
5
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
6
America's Second Harvest of the Big Bend Inc

To advance change by feeding the hungry and educating and engaging the community in the fight to end hunger.

Food & Nutrition
7
Montana Food Bank Network Inc

Our mission: to end hunger in montana through food acquisition and distribution, education, and advocacy. we are the only statewide hunger organization, providing emergency food and increasing food access among needy children, seniors and…

Food & Nutrition
8
Second Harvest North Central Food Bank

Engaging the community to end hunger

—
9
Brazos Valley Food Bank Inc

Cultivate an environment where our community can grow, contribute and thrive together. a more resilient brazos valley where nutritious food and opportunity are attainable for all.

Food & Nutrition
10
Second Harvest Community Food Bank

Our mission is to provide nourishment and hope in northwest missouri and northeast kansas by engaging the region in the fight to end hunger.

—
11
Harvesters - the Community Food Network

Harvesters mobilizes the power of our community to create equitable access to nutritious food and address the root causes and impact of hunger.

Food & Nutrition
12
Food Bank of Iowa

The organization receives, warehouses, and distributes salvageable food items to non-profit tax exempt member agencies to feed the ill, needy, and infants.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Union Mission Corporation and the most unlike its peers is National Humane Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsMilitary Veterans SupportAnimal Rescue and ShelterPregnancy Support ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Community FoundationsYmca Youth DevelopmentUnited Way AffiliatesDomestic Violence ServicesFood Banks and Pantries
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 38. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number13%0%<5yr9%5%5–10yr14%8%10–20yr12%32%20–35yr14%36%35–55yr39%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value13%0%<5yr9%2%5–10yr14%2%10–20yr12%40%20–35yr14%32%35–55yr39%23%55yr+

The field is 13% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 6% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/68
the rest of the field
6%
1,704/29,137

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
63/64
Grantees still filing
37/64
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ACEC RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $98,500 · OtherACEC RESEARCH INSTITUTEUNITED WAY OF MUSCATINE IOWA — $85,005 · OtherUNITED WAY OF MUSCATINE IOWAEngineers Without Borders — $37,545 · OtherEngineers Without BordersNational Pearl Button Museum — $32,976 · OtherNational Pearl Button MuseumAmerican Red Cross — $22,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY CORPS COMMUNITY CENTER — $21,700 · OtherMuscatine Chamber of Commerce — $20,000 · Other+43 more — $178,860 · Other+43 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MUSCATINE — $189,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GR…MUSCATINE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION — $37,000 · PhilanthropyMUSCATINE CHAMBER OF COMME…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY — $10,000 · Philanthropy+5 more — $18,500 · Philanthropy+5 moreFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $36,400 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF…ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE — $13,600 · Food & NutritionST MARY'S FO…FEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC — $12,500 · Food & NutritionFEEDING AMER…Central Texas Food Bank Inc — $10,400 · Food & NutritionCentral Texa…SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $9,700 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVE…FAIRBANKS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK SERVICE INC — $7,500 · Food & NutritionFAIRBANKS CO…GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $5,500 · Food & NutritionUSANA KIDS EAT — $5,300 · Food & NutritionIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE — $5,000 · Food & NutritionJACKSON COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY — $5,000 · Food & Nutrition+3 more — $8,300 · Food & Nutrition+3 moreSTATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION — $80,000 · EducationSTATE UNI…Paetow High School Athletic Booster Club Inc — $5,000 · EducationPaetow Hi…FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION — $3,688 · EducationMUSCATINE CENTER FOR SOCIAL ACTION — $54,200 · Community ImprovementSOUTH VALLEY SANCTUARY INC — $10,500 · Human ServicesMUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y — $10,000 · Human ServicesTOUCH MY HEART NFP — $5,500 · Human ServicesPUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC — $3,025 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY CRISIS SERVICES AND FOOD BANK — $2,500 · Human ServicesATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION — $2,500 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF SWITCHPOINT INC — $2,500 · Human ServicesLAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION — $2,500 · Human ServicesMERCER COUNTY FAMILY CRISIS CENTER — $1,500 · Human Services+2 more — $400 · Human ServicesACCESS HOUSING OF ADAMS COUNTY INC — $15,000 · Housing & ShelterHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC — $3,817 · Housing & ShelterDOVE CENTER INC — $2,500 · Housing & ShelterNicholas House Inc — $2,500 · Housing & ShelterJackson Interfaith Shelter — $2,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$497,086Philanthropy$255,000Food & Nutrition$119,200Education$88,688Community Improvement$54,200Human Services$40,925Housing & Shelter$26,317

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MUSCATINE — $189,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetACEC RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $98,500 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MUSCATINE IOWA — $85,005 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetSTATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION — $80,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCATINE CENTER FOR SOCIAL ACTION — $54,200 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetMUSCATINE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION — $37,000 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $36,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BATON ROUGE FOOD BANK — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetACCESS HOUSING OF ADAMS COUNTY INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE — $13,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH VALLEY SANCTUARY INC — $10,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $10,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN DISASTER RELIEF NETWORK — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetColorado Healing Fund — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMUSCATINE COMMUNITY Y — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $9,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAIRBANKS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK SERVICE INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX — $6,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOUCH MY HEART NFP — $5,500 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetUSANA KIDS EAT — $5,300 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSHELTER HOUSE COMMUNITY SHELTER AND TRANSITION SERVICES — $5,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE COUNTY CRISIS CENTER — $5,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPREGNANCY RESOURCES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED WAY OF EAST CENTRAL IOWA — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF JOHNSON & WASHINGTON COUNT — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJACKSON COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY — $5,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetPaetow High School Athletic Booster Club Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC — $4,900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC — $4,900 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetIOWA COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC — $3,817 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $3,805 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION — $3,688 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC — $3,025 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Soup Kitchen Inc — $2,900 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $2,900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOVE CENTER INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY CRISIS SERVICES AND FOOD BANK — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNicholas House Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF SWITCHPOINT INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …KENT CORPORATION CHAR…MidAmerican Energy Fo…GreenState Credit Uni…Alliant Energy Founda…New Hope FoundationShive-Hattery Group C…HNI Charitable Founda…Quad Cities Golf Clas…The Kroger Co Zero Hu…Lumen Clarke M Willia…Wells Fargo Foundation
Community Foundation of Greater MuscatineIA19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Muscatine · KENT CORPORATION CHARITABLE FOUNDATION fka KENT-STEIN FOUNDATION · MidAmerican Energy Foundation · GreenState Credit Union · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · New Hope Foundation · Shive-Hattery Group Charitable Contribution Fund Inc · HNI Charitable Foundation · Quad Cities Golf Classic Charitable Foundation · The Kroger Co Zero Hunger Zero Waste Foundation · Lumen Clarke M Williams Foundation · Wells Fargo Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Stanley Consultants Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Feeding South Florida Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 91 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines